Category: Wires

  • Is red wine better for you than white? The answer may surprise you.

    Is red wine better for you than white? The answer may surprise you.

    The question: Is red wine healthier than white wine?

    The science: Many people think red wine is better for you than white wine or other types of alcohol.

    The notion was partly born from studies — some of which have been disputed — that suggested that certain compounds found in red wine could improve cardiovascular health.

    Now the evidence suggests that any type of alcohol — including red wine — is unlikely to make you any healthier than drinking no alcohol at all.

    “There’s no isolated health benefit of red wine over white wine over any other beverage containing alcohol,” said George Koob, the director of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. And, he added, “There’s no physical health benefits of which we can attribute to alcohol.”

    While it’s long been known that heavy alcohol consumption can cause serious health problems, the potential benefits and risks of moderate drinking — defined as up to two drinks per day for men and one for women — have been murkier. In the past, some research suggested that people who drank small amounts of alcohol in general might have a health advantage compared with those who didn’t drink at all.

    But as research has evolved over the years, we now know that even modest drinking is linked to a higher risk of developing certain cancers such as breast, colorectal, and esophageal cancers, as well as brain changes and dementia, heart problems, and sleep problems.

    Dietary guidance has also changed. Current guidelines from the U.S. Department of Agriculture state that “emerging evidence suggests that even drinking within the recommended limits may increase the overall risk of death from various causes.” The American Heart Association recommends limiting or abstaining from alcohol, even though the association published a scientific review in 2025 that concluded that light drinking poses no risk for coronary artery disease, stroke, sudden death, and possibly heart failure, and may even reduce the risk of developing such conditions — though not all experts agreed with that conclusion.

    The argument in favor of red wine used to focus on certain compounds.

    Red wine contains more polyphenols — plant compounds with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties — because the grape juice is fermented with the grape skins, where these compounds are concentrated. (White wine grapes are pressed, and the skins removed, before the fermentation process.)

    These polyphenols include procyanidins, flavonoids, and resveratrol, which is often mentioned in cancer research. Another type, anthocyanins, helps give red wine its rich color and has been studied for potential cardiovascular benefits.

    Most of the health benefits associated with these polyphenols have been observed in studies at much higher doses than what you would get from a couple glasses of wine, so there’s no real advantage, experts said.

    “The concentrations are sufficiently low that you would have to drink more than moderate amounts to truly get that much more benefit from the polyphenols in red wine,” which could lead to health issues, said Eric Rimm, a professor of epidemiology and nutrition at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, who has studied the health effects of alcohol.

    Instead, you could add stronger sources of anthocyanins into your diet, including darker berries such as blueberries, apples, onions, black or green tea, and dark chocolate, Rimm said.

    As for other risks and benefits, some people may avoid red wine because it can stain teeth and cause headaches and even allergy-like symptoms. While red wine headaches are not fully understood, some people may be especially sensitive to the tannins in the grapes, histamines, or sulfites produced through fermentation, or the additional sulfites added to preserve wine. Some research suggests quercetin, an antioxidant found in grapes, may be responsible.

    In one study, people who had a wine intolerance were more likely to report allergy-like symptoms such as nasal congestion, itching, flushed skin, and stomach upset more often after drinking red wine than white wine.

    What else you should know

    While drinking alcohol probably won’t lead to any positive health effects, you may be able to reduce potential negative effects by how you drink it.

    First, speak with your healthcare provider about whether drinking alcohol is safe for you. People who are pregnant, have certain medical conditions, take medications that interact with alcohol, or have or are recovering from an alcohol-use disorder should not drink, according to USDA. Also, teetotalers, people who don’t already drink, should not start drinking for any health reasons, health officials said.

    Assuming you’re of legal drinking age — 21 years or older in the United States — here are some tips from experts:

    • Eat first. Food, particularly foods with some protein, fats, and carbohydrates, slows the absorption of alcohol into the bloodstream, reducing potential ill effects.
    • Understand drink sizes. A standard alcoholic drink has 0.6 ounces of pure alcohol. That’s equal to 5 ounces of wine with 12% alcohol, 12 ounces of beer with 5% alcohol, or a shot — 1.5 ounces — of an 80-proof liquor. When buying alcohol at a store, check the alcohol content. “Beer used to be 4 or 5% alcohol. There are a lot of beers now that are 8 to 10%. So you may want to drink a little bit less if you have a higher alcohol-containing beer or a higher alcohol-containing spirit,” Rimm said.
    • Keep in mind that men and women may process alcohol differently. Women generally don’t produce as much of an alcohol-metabolizing enzyme called alcohol dehydrogenase, which means they break down alcohol more slowly and are at a higher risk of alcohol-related health problems.
    • Drink in moderation, which is defined as up to two drinks per day for men and one for women. Also, space out drinks throughout the week — meaning don’t drink all 7 or 14 drinks in one weekend.

    The bottom line

    While red wine has more polyphenols, which are associated with cardiovascular benefits, than white wine, they aren’t in a high enough concentration to provide a health advantage. In addition, red wine may be more likely than white wine to cause headaches and allergy-like symptoms in people who are susceptible.

  • How student loans and financial aid are changing in 2026

    How student loans and financial aid are changing in 2026

    The landscape for financial aid is about to change.

    In 2026, the federal government will curb access to billions of dollars in student loans, reconfigure how borrowers repay their debt, and provide new grant money for short-term career training programs.

    All of these changes are slated to take effect in July and are the result of the One Big Beautiful Bill signed into law in summer. The financial aid provisions in the law, which extend tax cuts from President Donald Trump’s first term, will affect how families pay for higher education. Since November, the Education Department has been negotiating the terms of the policies with a panel of experts, as required by Congress. Terms for the new rules will be finalized early this year, with few anticipated changes.

    While some higher-education experts say the changes will deliver commonsense reforms, others worry they could discourage college enrollment and persistence. Either way, students entering college in fall 2026 will encounter a very different federal financial aid system.

    Here’s what you need to know.

    Student loan limits

    In one of the largest revisions to federal student loan policy in decades, the Education Department will impose new caps on the amount of money graduate students and parents can borrow from the government.

    The Grad Plus program, which lets students borrow up to the full cost of attendance to pay for graduate degrees, will sunset on July 1 for new borrowers. At the same time, people pursuing a master’s degree will have their borrowing capped at $20,500 a year and $100,000 over a lifetime. Those working toward a professional degree — say, an aspiring doctor or lawyer — will be capped at $50,000 a year and $200,000 in total from the federal government.

    In all, students will now face a lifetime maximum borrowing limit of $257,500 for undergraduate and graduate school federal loans combined. If those amounts are not enough to cover costs, students will have to pay the rest themselves or turn to private lenders.

    The distinction between graduate and professional degree programs has been a lightning rod for controversy. Nurses and others have railed against the Education Department’s proposal to exclude their fields from the higher loan limits. They worry the agency’s move to restrict the professional degree classification to 11 fields will discourage people from enrolling in other advanced degree programs.

    The proposal must still be published for public comment before it can be finalized, which allows its detractors to fight for a broader classification.

    Researchers say a substantial number of students pursuing master’s degrees will be affected by the new limits. An analysis by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia found that one-third of graduate students with federal loans have borrowed more than the new limits will allow. Research from the Postsecondary Education & Economics Research at American University found that students in professional programs are more likely to borrow in excess of the new limit.

    Beth Akers, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said she suspects that many people will be caught off guard by the new constraints on graduate borrowing, and she said colleges are not doing enough to prepare.

    “There could be a private-sector solution that covers the gap,” Akers said. “But I suspect that the coordination that’s necessary for that to happen by next fall will probably not happen.”

    There have been a lot of conversations among schools about offering institutional loans to help graduate students in need, said Scott Z. Goldschmidt, a partner at the law firm Thompson Coburn who works with higher-education clients. He said colleges are also exploring private loan alternatives and trying to identify scholarship opportunities.

    Limits on parents

    While the tax bill left undergraduate loan limits intact, it will affect how much parents can borrow to support students working toward an associate’s or bachelor’s degree.

    Parents and caregivers could previously take out as much as their child needed to attend college through the Parent Plus program, which is designed as a supplement when other types of student aid have been exhausted. Starting July 1, the program will set new limits of $20,000 a year, or a total of $65,000 per student.

    Because relatively few families use Parent Plus loans, researchers at the think tank Urban Institute estimate that the new limits will affect just 2% of students. Still, among families who rely on the loans, nearly a third will be affected by the annual cap, and 17% will run up against the $65,000-per-child total cap.

    “It will have a significant impact on a small number of people, and it will be people who we’re particularly concerned about, like disadvantaged populations who tend to use those resources the most,” Akers said.

    She hopes that colleges will provide more financial aid to lower the cost for students.

    Current borrowers are exempt from both of the new caps for three years.

    Fewer repayment plans

    The federal student loan repayment system is notoriously complex, with a multitude of options and terms that can be difficult to navigate. Instead of having seven repayment plans, new borrowers will have just two options after July 1: one standard plan and one new income-driven repayment (IDR) plan, called the Repayment Assistance Plan.

    The new standard plan will stretch monthly payments out from 10 to 25 years. The larger the debt, the longer the repayment term. Someone with an outstanding principal of less than $25,000 will repay the debt for no more than 10 years, while a borrower with more than $100,000 in federal loans will be in repayment for up to 25 years.

    Payments on the new income-driven plan will be based on a borrower’s total adjusted gross income, ranging from 1% to 10% depending on earnings. The plan cancels the remaining balance after 30 years of payments, instead of the current 20 or 25 years.

    Borrowers have to make a minimum monthly payment of $10. Those who make timely monthly payments will have their unpaid interest waived to prevent negative amortization, which happens when payments are not enough to cover the principal and interest. The plan also provides a monthly subsidy of up to $50 to ensure borrowers pay down their principal balance by at least that amount.

    An analysis from American University suggests that the principal subsidy could result in faster loan forgiveness for low-income, low-balance borrowers. Still, researchers said they worry that higher payments and a longer time before forgiveness for many low-income borrowers is likely to increase the rate of loan defaults.

    People who are currently repaying their loans can remain in any of the three existing plans that are not tied to income. Current borrowers on an income-driven plan can stay put until July 1, 2028, at which time they can switch to RAP or the original Income Based option. That income-based plan will give Parent Plus borrowers, who are barred from the new IDR plan, a repayment option tied to their earnings.

    There are some complications in consolidating the repayment plans. Congress gave borrowers enrolled in the Saving on a Valuable Education plan three years to exit, but a proposed settlement could speed up the timeline. The Education Department struck a deal in December with seven states to resolve a lawsuit challenging the legality of the Biden-era repayment plan. The agency stressed that enrollees would have a limited time to find another option to repay their debt, but it has not provided an explicit timeline.

    “Given what we’ve seen with folks not being able to enroll in plans and being stuck in a backlog … I’m really concerned there’s going to be even more chaos and confusion,” said Michele Zampini, associate vice president of federal policy and advocacy at the Institute for College Access & Success.

    Other student advocates worry about whether the Education Department will have revamped the repayment system to reflect all of the changes in time for the graduating class of 2026.

    People entering repayment for the first time will need an updated loan simulator, for instance, to select the best repayment plan, said Melanie Storey, president and chief executive of the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators. Although newly minted graduates have a six-month grace period before repayment kicks in, she said colleges need to start communicating to students about their options long before then.

    “We need information and we need clarity,” Storey said. “My members are the people on the ground who have to answer questions for students, and I’m concerned that given the schedule, we won’t have answers until well into the spring.”

    Pell Grant eligibility

    There are some significant changes ahead for the Pell Grant, the largest federal grant program for low- and middle-income college students. Chief among them is the expansion of the program to include students enrolling in career training programs that range from eight to 15 weeks in duration. Those programs, which are mainly offered at community and technical colleges, must provide at least 600 hours of instruction.

    In December, the Education Department reached a consensus with negotiators on the framework of the policy, dubbed Workforce Pell. The proposal must still be published and finalized, but higher-education experts expect few, if any, changes. It calls for governors to work with state advisory boards to determine program eligibility, with a focus on courses that are in high-demand fields such as nursing aides or emergency medical technicians.

    Other new policies could change the number of students eligible for Pell Grants. This summer, the Education Department will exclude assets from family farms, small businesses, and family-owned commercial fisheries from the calculation of the Student Aid Index, or SAI — a figure used to determine a student’s ability to pay for college and the amount of aid they receive.

    And some people may no longer be able to get a Pell Grant. The Education Department will begin including foreign income in the calculation of a student’s Pell eligibility, which could reduce eligibility. Furthermore, anyone who receives enough scholarship dollars to cover their full cost of attendance will no longer be eligible to receive Pell.

    Students will also be ineligible if their families have lots of assets but appear to have little income in the calculation of SAI. A student previously could qualify for Pell despite their family having a lot of assets if their parents generated business losses that lowered their adjusted gross income. Starting July 1, an SAI that is equal to or exceeds twice the amount of the maximum Pell award will be disqualifying.

  • Trump’s tax stimulus set to keep U.S. economy on track in 2026

    Trump’s tax stimulus set to keep U.S. economy on track in 2026

    After a year of rolling policy shocks, the U.S. economy is set to get a lift from President Donald Trump’s tax-cuts package to keep the expansion on track in 2026.

    American taxpayers will get bigger refunds in the first half of this year as a result of Trump’s signature bill, economists say, with estimates for the aggregate boost ranging from $30 billion to $100 billion. Incentives for companies to invest in plants and equipment are also likely to bolster growth while lower borrowing costs, and steadier trade policy should help too.

    Still, forecasters see grounds for caution. Any burst of consumer spending from Trump’s fiscal stimulus is expected to fade as the year goes on, while tariffs will continue to weigh on small businesses especially. Unemployment is on the rise, as are concerns about affordability and inequality. The AI boom may not deliver the kind of broad-based growth its advocates promise, and the U.S. attack on Venezuela shows the potential for geopolitical instability.

    Adding it all up, economists surveyed by Bloomberg in mid-December expected growth of 2% in 2026 — the same as their forecast for 2025. That would likely be enough to extend America’s streak of outperforming its developed-world peers, though it’s a modest pace by past U.S. standards.

    “2026 is shaping up to be a decent year — not a boom, not a bust, just solid trend growth,” said Olu Sonola, head of U.S. economic research at Fitch Ratings.

    Federal Reserve officials were slightly more optimistic than Wall Street at their meeting last month, penciling in an increase of 2.3% in gross domestic product this year. The central bank’s economic staff cited fiscal policy, easier financial conditions, and a dissipation of the tariff impact as growth drivers through 2028, minutes of the meeting released recently show.

    The world’s largest economy weathered the shocks of 2025 better than most pundits predicted. After an initial slump driven by tariff front-running, growth bounced right back — and unexpectedly accelerated to 4.3% in the third quarter, according to numbers eventually published on Dec. 23 after a long delay due to the government shutdown.

    “President Trump’s economic agenda unleashed historic job, wage, and economic growth in his first term,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement. “The Trump administration is implementing this same agenda of rapid deregulation, working-class tax cuts, full equipment expensing, and energy abundance — accelerating GDP growth and trillions in investment commitments are proof that the best is yet to come in President Trump’s second term.”

    ‘Helps us invest’

    Trump’s legislation extended income-tax reductions and added new exemptions for tips and overtime pay. Refunds will average $300 to $1,000 more than in a typical year, according to the Tax Foundation. In aggregate, economists at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. anticipate an extra $100 billion for consumers in the first half, while Citigroup Inc. put the figure at $30 billion to $50 billion.

    A longer-lasting impact will likely come from business incentives, some economists say.

    Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY-Parthenon, expects the fiscal package to lift GDP by 0.3% this year. He says some elements of the bill, like cuts in Medicaid and food-aid programs, will be a drag on growth — but reckons they’ll be outweighed by others including higher defense and border-enforcement spending, and measures to help businesses deduct the cost of investments.

    Among those anticipating a boost is Gat Caperton, who runs furniture-maker Gat Creek in West Virginia.

    “It helps us invest in our business,” Caperton said. “There’s really good high-end technology equipment that’s very competitive and very productive for us. And we will spend aggressively to buy that type of material.”

    ‘Faster gear’

    Investments like these and the Fed’s easing of monetary policy will cushion a slowing job market, according to Kathy Bostjancic, chief economist at Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. The unemployment rate rose to 4.6% in November, the highest in more than four years, and economists predict it will average 4.5% this year.

    “Labor demand should shift into a faster gear by mid-year as businesses increase investment in response to lower interest rates and tax incentives,” Bostjancic said.

    Fed policymakers including Chair Jerome Powell have said inflation linked to higher tariffs will likely be a one-off and eventually fade. Still, the cost of living was a major issue in November’s off-year elections, where Trump’s Republicans suffered losses. Companies remain concerned about tariffs and are projecting price increases of more than 3% in 2026, according to one recent survey.

    Jonathan Echeverry’s coffee business in Montclair, N.J., had to pay out an additional $150,000 in tariffs on beans, packaging, and other imports — just as his customers are becoming choosier in their spending.

    “People are opting to buy beans to brew at home rather than to buy beverages,” said Echeverry, who co-owns Paper Plane Coffee Co. “I doubt this year will be better.”

    Most forecasters anticipate a quieter year on the trade policy front compared with the chaos of 2025 — but there’s plenty of uncertainty still. The Supreme Court is expected to rule soon on the legitimacy of some of Trump’s import taxes. The president has floated the prospect of $2,000 tariff rebate checks, which would offer another boost to growth — and further pressure on the U.S. budget deficit.

    AI spillovers

    Another unknown is artificial intelligence. The rush to build and equip data centers helped lift business investment in 2025, and the AI-led equity boom amplified the purchasing power of wealthier Americans, but there’s also concern that the technology will replace human workers.

    There’s a disconnect between multibillion-dollar announcements of new data centers and the amount of hiring they generate, according to Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co.

    “It’s not creating as many jobs as the big nominal numbers might imply and that’s in contrast to past capex booms,” he said. “Labor demand continues to look soft, and that leaves us worried about downside risks.”

  • ICE shooting reinforces Minnesota’s grim role as Trump’s target

    ICE shooting reinforces Minnesota’s grim role as Trump’s target

    MINNEAPOLIS — Federal officers have encountered opposition in nearly all of the cities targeted by President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement campaign. But it was in Minnesota — a state in daily conflict with the Trump administration this year — that a 37-year-old woman was shot and killed by an immigration officer.

    Trump has focused on several blue states in the divide-and-conquer campaign that has characterized his second term, and now he has turned to Minnesota, where the killing of George Floyd and the protests it sparked stained his first presidency.

    Trump last month called the state’s Somali population “garbage” in the wake of a massive federal investigation into COVID-19 and medical aid fraud tied to organizations serving Somali immigrants, among others. The fraud cases led Minnesota’s Democratic governor, Tim Walz — former Vice President Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate — to announce this week he will not run for reelection.

    In June, a Democratic state lawmaker and her husband were assassinated by a Trump supporter, although conservatives insist the gunman was actually a leftist working at Walz’s behest. On Sunday, the victims’ family begged Trump to take down a social media post echoing those conspiracy theories.

    Memories of the chaos that followed the killing of George Floyd

    Amid that mounting tension, the Trump administration announced Tuesday that it was sending more than 2,000 federal officers to the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul in what it claimed would be the biggest immigration enforcement operation in history.

    The Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer who killed Renee Good during a protest Wednesday against the immigration raids opened fire just blocks from where, in 2020, a Minneapolis police officer killed George Floyd. The parallels were painful and frightening for many in the area, including Stephanie Abel, a 56-year-old Minneapolis nurse, who is keeping her gas tank full and cash handy in memory of the chaos that followed that slaying.

    “I thought the federal government would realize that now is not the time to be toying with people,” Abel said. “What are they going to try to do to get Minneapolis to ignite?”

    Floyd’s death sparked the biggest protests of Trump’s first term. The president, who is still publicly bitter about the unrest, contends it should have been met with a stronger show of force.

    That’s the approach Trump has adopted in his second term, trying to cow blue states by surging military and immigration agents into their cities and insisting that anyone who doesn’t comply with federal demands will face severe consequences.

    Immigration operations that started last summer in liberal strongholds such as Chicago,Los Angeles and Portland also generated large protests. Good is at least the fifth person killed during ICE enforcement efforts.

    On Thursday, Vice President JD Vance said Good’s death was “a tragedy of her own making,” blamed “leftist ideology” and said the media had encouraged protests against Trump’s immigration crackdown. Vance spoke at the White House to announce a new assistant attorney general position to prosecute the abuse of government assistance programs that will focus on Minnesota.

    Federal investigators have Somalis in their sights

    The Twin Cities operation is intertwined with a conservative effort to make Minnesota the poster child for government fraud. Though prosecutions for the fraudulent use of hundreds of millions of dollars of federal COVID-19 and health aid by social service groups began in the Biden administration, Trump and conservatives have seized on the scandal in recent weeks.

    In November, Trump called Minnesota “a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity” after a report by a conservative news site, City Journal, claimed federal money was fraudulently flowing to the militant group al-Shabab. There has been little, if any, evidence, proving such a link. Nevertheless, the president said he would end Temporary Protected Status for Somalis in Minnesota.

    The allegations got a new charge late last month when conservative influencer Nick Shirley posted an unconfirmed video claiming that day care centers in Minneapolis run by Somalis had fraudulently collected over $100 million in government aid.

    Jamal Osman, a Somali immigrant and Minneapolis city councilman who lives just a few blocks from the location of the ICE shooting, said he and other prominent Somalis in the area have been swamped with angry calls and messages since Trump made his statements. The vitriol, he said, mainly comes from out of state.

    “We have whole groups of people who’ve never been to Minnesota,” Osman said in an interview. “Minnesota is probably one of the nicest places to live. It’s a beautiful area with very nice people and we blended in, it’s all very nice. We don’t really see bad things happening here normally.”

    The Trump administration on Tuesday said is withholding funding for programs that support needy families with children, including day care funding, in five Democratic-led states over concerns about fraud. Joining Minnesota on the list were California, Colorado, Illinois and New York.

    ‘Leave our state alone’

    Minnesota’s place on a list of targeted blue states is not unexpected.

    Under Walz, Minnesota has become something of a beacon for liberals as an example of a state that expanded the public safety net even as the nation swung to the right. Since Trump’s first election, the state has seen large increases in education spending, free school breakfasts and lunches, and improved protection of abortion rights.

    Trump lost Minnesota by only 4 percentage points in 2024, making it significantly less liberal than California and New York. Still, it has been reliably Democratic throughout the Trump years, a rarity in the swingy upper Midwest.

    The state’s political tilt reflects the size of the Twin Cities metro area and its robust population of college-educated liberals, which overwhelm the state’s more conservative rural reaches.

    It’s the sort of cleavage that has defined national politics during Trump’s years in office.

    “Minnesota is a microcosm of a lot of the tensions we have in our society,” said David Schultz, a political scientist at Hamline University in St. Paul. “We’re a country that’s hugely polarized, Democrats-Republicans, urban-rural.”

    On Thursday, Minnesota was an ominous indicator of the damage those divisions can inflict. Minneapolis schools remained closed after immigration agents clashed with high school students at one campus on Wednesday. The state’s National Guard remained on standby at Walz’s directive.

    Walz begged Trump to ease up, saying Minnesota’s residents are “exhausted” by the president’s “relentless assault on Minnesota.”

    “So please, just give us a break,” Walz said during a news conference Thursday. “And if it’s me, you’re already getting what you want, but leave my people alone. Leave our state alone.”

  • Somalia denies U.S. allegation that it destroyed food aid warehouse

    Somalia denies U.S. allegation that it destroyed food aid warehouse

    MOGADISHU, Somalia — Somalia’s government on Thursday denied an allegation by the U.S. government that authorities in Mogadishu destroyed an American-funded warehouse belonging to the World Food Program and seized food aid earmarked for impoverished civilians.

    The U.S. State Department said Wednesday that it has suspended all assistance from Washington to Somalia’s federal government over the allegations, saying the Trump administration has “a zero-tolerance policy for waste, theft and diversion of life-saving assistance.”

    A senior U.S. State Department official said authorities at the Mogadishu port demolished the warehouse of the World Food Program, a Rome-based U.N. agency, at the direction of President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud “with no prior notification or coordination with international donor countries, including the United States.” The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private reporting from American diplomats in the region.

    Somalia’s foreign ministry said that the food in question wasn’t destroyed and that “the commodities referenced in recent reports remain under the custody and control of the World Food Program, including assistance provided by the United States.”

    The foreign ministry said expansion and repurposing works at the Mogadishu port are underway as part of broader developments, but ongoing activities there have not affected the custody and distribution of humanitarian assistance.

    Somalia “remains fully committed to humanitarian principles, transparency, and accountability, and values its partnership with the United States and all international donors,” it said. It gave no other details.

    The WFP told The Associated Press in a statement that its warehouse in Mogadishu port had been demolished by port authorities. The organization said the warehouse contained 75 metric tones of specialized foods intended for the treatment of malnourished pregnant and breastfeeding women and girls and young children.

    In a later update, the WFP said it had “retrieved 75 metric tons of nutritional commodities” without explaining further details on how the material was retried.

    The U.S. State Department said: “We’re glad to hear reports that certain commodities have been recovered and continue our investigation into diversion and misuse of assistance in Somalia. We’ve urged the Federal Government of Somalia to promptly follow through on their commitment to provide an account of the incident.”

    Located in the Horn of Africa, Somalia is one of the world’s poorest nations and has been beset by chronic strife and insecurity exacerbated by multiple natural disasters, including severe droughts, for decades.

    The U.S. provided $770 million in assistance for projects in Somalia during the last year of Democratic President Joe Biden’s administration, but only a fraction of that went directly to the government.

    The U.S. suspension comes as the Trump administration has ratcheted up criticism of Somali refugees and migrants in the United States, including over fraud allegations involving child care centers in Minnesota. It has slapped significant restrictions on Somalis wanting to come to the U.S. and made it difficult for those already in the United States to stay.

    It wasn’t immediately clear how much assistance would be affected by the suspension because the Trump administration has slashed foreign aid expenditures, dismantled the U.S. Agency for International Development and not released new country-by-country data.

    South Sudan, another African country facing conflict and food shortage, is also heavily affected by U.S. aid restrictions. On Thursday, the U.S. suspended foreign assistance to a county in South Sudan’s Jonglei state, and similar assistance to Western Bahr el-Ghazal state was under review, the U.S. Embassy in South Sudan said in a statement.

    That statement charged that South Sudanese officials “take advantage of the United States instead of working in partnership with us to help the South Sudanese people.”

    The U.S. measures “follow continued abuse, exploitation, and theft directed against U.S. foreign assistance by South Sudanese officials at national, state, and county levels,” it said.

    There was no immediate comment from South Sudan’s government.

  • Senate pushes back on Trump’s military threats against Venezuela with war powers vote

    Senate pushes back on Trump’s military threats against Venezuela with war powers vote

    WASHINGTON — The Senate advanced a resolution Thursday that would limit President Donald Trump’s ability to conduct further attacks against Venezuela, sounding a note of disapproval for his expanding ambitions in the Western Hemisphere.

    Democrats and five Republicans voted to advance the war powers resolution on a 52-47 vote and ensure a vote next week on final passage. It has virtually no chance of becoming law because Trump would have to sign it if it were to pass the Republican-controlled House. Still, it was a significant gesture that showed unease among some Republicans after the U.S. military seized Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in a surprise nighttime raid over the weekend.

    Trump’s administration is now seeking to control Venezuela’s oil resources and its government, but the war powers resolution would require congressional approval for any further attacks on the South American country.

    “To me, this is all about going forward,” said Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, one of the five Republican votes. “If the president should determine, ‘You know what? I need to put troops on the ground of Venezuela,’ I think that would require Congress to weigh in.”

    The other Republicans who backed the resolution were Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine and Todd Young of Indiana.

    Trump reacted to their votes by saying on social media that they “should never be elected to office again” and that the vote “greatly hampers American Self Defense and National Security.”

    Democrats had failed to pass several such resolutions in the months that Trump escalated his campaign against Venezuela. But lawmakers argued now that Trump has captured Maduro and set his sights to other conquests such as Greenland, the vote presents Congress with an opportunity.

    “This wasn’t just a procedural vote. It’s a clear rejection of the idea that one person can unilaterally send American sons and daughters into harm’s way without Congress, without debate,” said Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York.

    Lawmakers’ response to the Venezuela operation

    Republican leaders have said they had no advance notification of the raid early morning Saturday to seize Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, but mostly expressed satisfaction this week as top administration officials provided classified briefings on the operation.

    Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., who forced the vote on the resolution, said he believes many Republicans were caught off guard by the outcome. He said that Trump’s recent comments to The New York Times suggesting U.S. oversight in Venezuela could last for years — combined with details revealed in the classified briefings — prompted some lawmakers to conclude that “this is too big to let a president do it without Congress.”

    The administration has used an evolving set of legal justifications for the monthslong campaign in Central and South America, from destroying alleged drug boats under authorizations for the global fight against terrorism to seizing Maduro in what was ostensibly a law enforcement operation to put him on trial in the United States.

    Republican leaders have backed Trump.

    “I think the president has demonstrated at least already a very strong commitment to peace through strength, especially in this hemisphere,” said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. “I think Venezuela got that message loudly and clearly.”

    A vote on a similar resolution in November narrowly failed to gain the majority needed. Paul and Murkowski were the only Republicans voting in favor then.

    Young in a statement said he supported the operation to capture Maduro, but was concerned by Trump’s statements that his administration now “runs” Venezuela.

    “It is unclear if that means that an American military presence will be required to stabilize the country,” Young said, adding that he believed most of his constituents were not prepared to send U.S. troops to that mission.

    House Democrats were introducing a similar resolution Thursday.

    The rarely enforced War Powers Act

    Trump criticized the Senate vote as “impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief” under the Constitution.

    Presidents of both parties have long argued the War Powers Act infringes on their authority. Passed in 1973 in the aftermath of the Vietnam War — and over the veto of Republican President Richard Nixon — it has never succeeded in directly forcing a president to halt military action.

    Congress declares war while the president serves as commander in chief, according to the Constitution. But lawmakers have not formally declared war since World War II, granting presidents broad latitude to act unilaterally. The law requires presidents to notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying forces and to end military action within 60 to 90 days absent authorization — limits that presidents of both parties have routinely stretched.

    Democrats argue those limits are being pushed further than ever. Some Republicans have gone further still, contending congressional approval is unnecessary altogether.

    Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a close Trump ally who traveled with the president aboard Air Force One on Sunday, said he would be comfortable with Trump taking over other countries without congressional approval, including Greenland.

    “The commander in chief is the commander in chief. They can use military force,” Graham said.

    Greenland may further test the limits

    Graham’s comments come as the administration weighs not only its next steps in Venezuela, but also Greenland. The White House has said the “military is always an option” when it comes to a potential American takeover of the world’s largest island.

    Republicans have cited Greenland’s strategic value, but most have balked at the idea of using the military to take the country. Some favor a potential deal to purchase the country, while others have acknowledged that is an unlikely option when Denmark and Greenland have rejected Trump’s overtures.

    Democrats want to get out in front of any military action and are already preparing to respond. Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego said he expected soon to introduce a resolution “to block Trump from invading Greenland.”

    Greenland belongs to a NATO ally, Denmark, which has prompted a much different response from Republican senators than the situation in Venezuela.

    On Thursday, Sen. Roger Wicker, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, met with the Danish ambassador to the United States, Jesper Møller Sørensen. Also in the meeting were the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, New Hampshire Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, and the head of Greenland’s representation to the U.S. and Canada, Jacob Isbosethsen.

    “There’s no willingness on their part to negotiate for the purchase or the change in title to their land which they’ve had for so long,” Wicker, R-Miss., said afterward. “That’s their prerogative and their right.”

    Wicker added that he hoped an agreement could be reached that would strengthen the U.S. relationship with Denmark.

    “Greenland is not for sale,” Isbosethsen told reporters.

  • Internet and phones cut in Iran as protesters heed exiled prince’s call for mass demonstration

    Internet and phones cut in Iran as protesters heed exiled prince’s call for mass demonstration

    DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — People in Iran’s capital shouted from their homes and raIran’s government cut off the country from the internet and international telephone calls Thursday night as a nighttime demonstration called by the country’s exiled crown prince drew a mass of protesters to shout from their windows and storm the streets.

    The protest represented the first test of whether the Iranian public could be swayed by Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, whose fatally ill father fled Iran just before the country’s 1979 Islamic Revolution. Demonstrations have included cries in support of the shah, something that could bring a death sentence in the past but now underlines the anger fueling the protests that began over Iran’s ailing economy.

    The demonstrations that have popped up in cities and rural towns across Iran continued Thursday. More markets and bazaars shut down in support of the protesters. So far, violence around the demonstrations has killed at least 42 people while more than 2,270 others have been detained, said the U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency.

    The growth of the protests increases the pressure on Iran’s civilian government and its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. CloudFlare, an internet firm, and the advocacy group NetBlocks reported the internet outage, both attributing it to Iranian government interference. Attempts to dial landlines and mobile phones from Dubai to Iran could not be connected. Such outages have in the past been followed by intense government crackdowns.

    Meanwhile, the protests themselves have remained broadly leaderless. It remains unclear how Pahlavi’s call will affect the demonstrations moving forward.

    “The lack of a viable alternative has undermined past protests in Iran,” wrote Nate Swanson of the Washington-based Atlantic Council, who studies Iran.

    “There may be a thousand Iranian dissident activists who, given a chance, could emerge as respected statesmen, as labor leader Lech Wałęsa did in Poland at the end of the Cold War. But so far, the Iranian security apparatus has arrested, persecuted and exiled all of the country’s potential transformational leaders.”

    Thursday’s demonstration rallies at home and in street

    Pahlavi had called for demonstrations at 8 p.m. local (1630 GMT) on Thursday and Friday. When the clock struck, neighborhoods across Tehran erupted in chanting, witnesses said. The chants included “Death to the dictator!” and “Death to the Islamic Republic!” Others praised the shah, shouting: “This is the last battle! Pahlavi will return!” Thousands could be seen on the streets before all communication to Iran cut out.

    “Iranians demanded their freedom tonight. In response, the regime in Iran has cut all lines of communication,” Pahlavi said. “It has shut down the Internet. It has cut landlines. It may even attempt to jam satellite signals.”

    He went on to call for European leaders to join U.S. President Donald Trump in promising to “hold the regime to account.”

    “I call on them to use all technical, financial, and diplomatic resources available to restore communication to the Iranian people so that their voice and their will can be heard and seen,” he added. ”Do not let the voices of my courageous compatriots be silenced.”

    Pahlavi had said he would offer further plans depending on the response to his call. His support of and from Israel has drawn criticism in the past — particularly after the 12-day war Israel waged on Iran in June. Demonstrators have shouted in support of the shah in some demonstrations, but it isn’t clear whether that’s support for Pahlavi himself or a desire to return to a time before the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

    Iranian officials appeared to be taking the planned protests seriously. The hard-line Kayhan newspaper published a video online claiming security forces would use drones to identify those taking part.

    Iranian officials have not acknowledged the scale of the overall protests, which raged across many locations Thursday even before the 8 p.m. demonstration. However, there has been reporting regarding security officials being hurt or killed.

    The judiciary’s Mizan news agency report a police colonel suffered fatal stab wounds in a town outside of Tehran, while the semiofficial Fars news agency said gunmen killed two security force members and wounded 30 others in a shooting in the city of Lordegan in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province.

    A deputy governor in Iran’s Khorasan Razavi province told Iranian state television that an attack at a police station killed five people Wednesday night in Chenaran, some 700 kilometers (430 miles) northeast of Tehran. Late Thursday, the Revolutionary Guard said two members of its forces were killed in Kermanshah.

    Iran weighs Trump threat

    Iran has faced rounds of nationwide protests in recent years. As sanctions tightened and Iran struggled after the 12-day war, its rial currency collapsed in December, reaching 1.4 million to $1. Protests began soon after, with demonstrators chanting against Iran’s theocracy.

    It remains unclear why Iranian officials have yet to crack down harder on the demonstrators. Trump warned last week that if Tehran “violently kills peaceful protesters,” America “will come to their rescue.”

    Speaking to talk show host Hugh Hewitt, Trump reiterated his pledge.

    Iran has “been told very strongly, even more strongly than I’m speaking to you right now, that if they do that, they’re going to have to pay hell,” Trump said.

    Trump demurred when asked if he’d meet with Pahlavi.

    “I’m not sure that it would be appropriate at this point to do that as president,” Trump said. “I think that we should let everybody go out there, and we see who emerges.”

    Meanwhile, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi remains imprisoned by authorities after her arrest in December.

    “Since Dec. 28, 2025, the people of Iran have taken to the streets, just as they did in 2009, 2019,” her son Ali Rahmani said. “Each time, the same demands came up: an end to the Islamic Republic, an end to this patriarchal, dictatorial and religious regime, the end of the clerics, the end of the mullahs’ regime.”

  • Anger and outrage spills onto Minneapolis streets after ICE officer’s fatal shooting of Renee Good

    Anger and outrage spills onto Minneapolis streets after ICE officer’s fatal shooting of Renee Good

    MINNEAPOLIS — As anger and outrage spilled out onto Minneapolis’ streets Thursday over the fatal shooting of a woman the day before by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer, a new shooting by federal officers in Oregon left two people wounded and elicited more scrutiny of enforcement operations across the country.

    Hundreds of people protesting the shooting of Renee Good as she tried to drive away marched in freezing rain Thursday night down one of Minneapolis’ major thoroughfares chanting “ICE out now” and holding signs saying, “killer ice off our streets.” Protesters earlier vented their outrage outside of a federal facility that’s serving as a hub for the administration’s latest immigration crackdown on a major city.

    The shooting in Portland, Oregon, took place outside a hospital Thursday afternoon and the conditions of the two people wounded were not immediately known. The FBI’s Portland office said it is investigating.

    Just as it did following the Minneapolis shooting, the Department of Homeland Security defended the actions of the officers in Portland, saying the shooting occurred after a Venezuelan man with alleged gang ties and who was involved in a recent shooting tried to “weaponize” his vehicle to hit the officers. It wasn’t clear yet if witness video corroborates that account.

    Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, President Donald Trump and others in his administration have repeatedly characterized the Minneapolis shooting as an act of self-defense and cast Good as a villain, suggesting she used her vehicle as a weapon to attack the officer who shot her.

    Vice President JD Vance said the shooting was justified and that Good, a 37-year-old mother of three, was a “victim of left-wing ideology.”

    “I can believe that her death is a tragedy while also recognizing that it is a tragedy of her own making,” Vance said, noting that the officer who killed her was injured while making an arrest last June.

    But state and local officials and protesters rejected that characterization, with Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey saying video of the shooting shows the self-defense argument was “garbage.”

    An immigration crackdown quickly turns deadly

    The shooting happened on the second day of the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown on the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, which Homeland Security said is the biggest immigration enforcement operation ever. More than 2,000 officers are taking part, and Noem said they have already made more than 1,500 arrests.

    It provoked an immediate response in the city where police killed George Floyd in 2020, with hundreds of people turning up to the scene to vent their outrage at the ICE officers and the school district canceling classes for the rest of the week as a precaution.

    Good’s death — at least the fifth tied to immigration sweeps since Trump took office — has resonated far beyond Minneapolis, as protests took place or were expected this week in many large U.S. cities.

    “We should be horrified,” protester Shanta Hejmadi said. “We should be saddened that our government is waging war on our citizens.”

    Who will investigate?

    On Thursday, the Minnesota agency that investigates officer-involved shootings said it was informed that the FBI and U.S. Justice Department would not work with the department, effectively ending any role for the state to determine if crimes were committed. Noem said the state has no jurisdiction.

    “Without complete access to the evidence, witnesses and information collected, we cannot meet the investigative standards that Minnesota law and the public demands,” Drew Evans, the bureau’s superintendent, said.

    Gov. Tim Walz publicly demanded that the state be allowed to take part, repeatedly emphasizing that it would be “very difficult for Minnesotans” to accept that an investigation that excludes the state could be fair.

    Noem, he said, was “judge, jury and basically executioner” during her public comments about the confrontation.

    “People in positions of power have already passed judgment, from the president to the vice president to Kristi Noem — have stood and told you things that are verifiably false, verifiably inaccurate,” the governor said.

    Frey, the mayor, told The Associated Press: “We want to make sure that there is a check on this administration to ensure that this investigation is done for justice, not for the sake of a cover-up.”

    Deadly encounter seen from multiple angles

    Several bystanders captured footage of Good’s killing, which happened in a neighborhood south of downtown.

    The videos show an officer approaching an SUV stopped across the middle of the road, demanding the driver open the door and grabbing the handle. The Honda Pilot begins to pull forward, and a different ICE officer standing in front of it pulls his weapon and immediately fires at least two shots at close range, jumping back as the vehicle moves toward him.

    It isn’t clear from the videos if the vehicle makes contact with the officer, and there is no indication of whether the woman had interactions with ICE agents earlier. After the shooting the SUV speeds into two cars parked on a curb before crashing to a stop.

    Officer identified in court documents

    Noem hasn’t publicly named the officer who shot Good. But a Homeland Security spokesperson said her description of his injuries last summer refers to an incident in Bloomington, Minnesota, in which court documents identify him as Jonathan Ross.

    Ross got his arm stuck in the window of a vehicle of a driver who was fleeing arrest on an immigration violation, and was dragged roughly 100 yards (91 meters) before he was knocked free, records show.

    He fired his Taser, but the prongs didn’t incapacitate the driver, according to prosecutors. Ross was transported to a hospital, where he received more than 50 stitches.

    A jury found the driver guilty of assaulting a federal officer with a dangerous weapon.

    DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin said the officer involved in the shooting had worked more than 10 years as a deportation officer and had been selected for ICE’s special response team, which includes a 30-hour tryout and additional training.

    McLaughlin declined to confirm the identity of the officer as Ross. The AP wasn’t immediately able to locate a phone number or address for Ross, and ICE no longer has a union that might comment on his behalf.

  • Family and neighbors mourn woman who was shot by ICE agent and had made Minneapolis home

    Family and neighbors mourn woman who was shot by ICE agent and had made Minneapolis home

    MINNEAPOLIS — Before Renee Good was fatally shot behind the wheel of her vehicle by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer, the 37-year-old mother of three had dropped off her youngest child at an elementary school in Minneapolis, the newest city she called home.

    While Trump administration officials continued Thursday to paint Good as a domestic terrorist who attempted to ram federal agents with her Honda Pilot, members of her family, friends and neighbors mourned a woman they remembered as gentle, kind and openhearted.

    Good, her 6-year-old son and her wife had only recently relocated to Minneapolis from Kansas City, Missouri. The family settled in a quiet residential street of older homes and multifamily buildings, some front porches festooned with pride flags still twinkling with holiday lights. A day after her death, neighbors had grown weary of talking to reporters. A handwritten sign posted to one front door read “NO MEDIA INQUIRES” and “JUSTICE FOR RENEE.”

    Far from the worst-of-the-worst criminals President Donald Trump said his immigration crackdown would target, Good was a U.S. citizen born in Colorado who had apparently never have been charged with anything beyond a single traffic ticket.

    In social media accounts, she described herself as a “poet and writer and wife and mom.” She said she was currently “experiencing Minneapolis,” displaying a pride emoji on her Instagram account. A profile picture posted to Pinterest shows her smiling and holding a young child against her cheek, along with posts about tattoos, hairstyles and home decorating.

    Her ex-husband, who asked not to be named out of concern for the safety of their children, said Good was no activist and that he had never known her to participate in a protest of any kind. He said she was simply headed home before the encounter with a group of ICE agents on a snowy street.

    State and local officials and protesters have rejected the Trump administration’s characterization of the shooting, with Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey saying video of the shooting shows the self-defense argument was “garbage.”

    Video taken by bystanders posted to social media shows an officer approaching her car, demanding she open the door and grabbing the handle. When she begins to pull forward, a different ICE officer standing in front of the vehicle pulls his weapon and immediately fires at least two shots into the vehicle at close range.

    The entire deadly incident was over in less than 10 seconds.

    In another video taken immediately after the shooting, a distraught woman is seen sitting near the vehicle, wailing, “That’s my wife, I don’t know what to do!”

    Calls and messages to Good’s wife received no response.

    By Thursday, a few dozen people had gathered on the one-way street where Good was killed, blocking the roadway with steel drums filled with burning wood for warmth to ward of a pelting freezing rain. Passersby stopped to pay their respects at a makeshift memorial with bouquets of flowers and a hand-fashioned cross.

    Good’s ex-husband said she was a devoted Christian who took part in youth mission trips to Northern Ireland when she was younger. She loved to sing, participating in a chorus in high school and studying vocal performance in college.

    She studied creative writing at Old Dominion University in Virginia and won a prize in 2020 for one of her works, according to a post on the school’s English department Facebook page. She also hosted a podcast with her second husband, who died in 2023.

    Kent Wascom, who taught Good in the creative writing program at Old Dominion, recalled her juggling the birth of her child with both work and school in 2019. He described her as “incredibly caring of her peers.”

    “What stood out to me in her prose was that, unlike a lot of young fiction writers, her focus was outward rather than inward,” Wascom said. “A creative writing workshop can be a gnarly place with a lot of egos and competition, but her presence was something that helped make that classroom a really supportive place.”

    Good had a daughter and a son from her first marriage, who are now ages 15 and 12. Her 6-year-old son was from her second marriage.

    Her ex-husband said she had primarily been a stay-at-home mom in recent years but had previously worked as a dental assistant and at a credit union.

    Donna Ganger, her mother, told the Minnesota Star Tribune the family was notified of the death late Wednesday morning. She did not respond to calls or messages from the AP.

    “Renee was one of the kindest people I’ve ever known,” Ganger told the newspaper. “She was extremely compassionate. She’s taken care of people all her life. She was loving, forgiving and affectionate. She was an amazing human being.”

  • Federal immigration officers shoot and wound two people in Portland, authorities say

    Federal immigration officers shoot and wound two people in Portland, authorities say

    PORTLAND, Ore. — Federal immigration agents shot and wounded two people in a vehicle outside a hospital in Portland on Thursday, a day after an officer fatally shot a woman in Minnesota, authorities said.

    The shooting drew hundreds of protesters to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement building at night, and Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield vowed to investigate “whether any federal officer acted outside the scope of their lawful authority” and refer criminal charges to the prosecutor’s office if warranted.

    The Department of Homeland Security said the vehicle’s passenger was “a Venezuelan illegal alien affiliated with the transnational Tren de Aragua prostitution ring” who was involved in a recent shooting in the city. When agents identified themselves to the occupants during a “targeted vehicle stop” in the afternoon, the driver tried to run them over, the department said in a statement.

    “Fearing for his life and safety, an agent fired a defensive shot,” it said. “The driver drove off with the passenger, fleeing the scene.”

    There was no immediate independent corroboration of that account or of any gang affiliation of the vehicle’s occupants. During prior shootings involving agents from President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdowns in U.S. cities, including the fatal one Wednesday in Minneapolis, video evidence has cast doubt on the administration’s characterizations of what prompted the shootings.

    Trump and his allies have consistently blamed the Tren de Aragua gang for being at the root of violence and drug dealing in some U.S. cities.

    The Portland shooting escalates tensions in a city that has long had a contentious relationship with Trump, including due to his recent failed effort to deploy National Guard troops there. The city saw long-running nightly protests outside the ICE building.

    According to the Portland Police bureau, officers initially responded to a report of a shooting outside Adventist Health hospital at 2:18 p.m. Thursday.

    A few minutes later, police received information that a man who had been shot was asking for help in a residential area a couple of miles away. Officers went there and found a man and a woman with gunshot wounds. Officers determined that they were injured in the shooting with federal agents, police said.

    Their conditions were not immediately known. Portland police said officers applied a tourniquet to one of them.

    City Council President Elana Pirtle-Guiney said during a meeting that “as far as we know, both of these individuals are still alive, and we are hoping for more positive updates throughout the afternoon.”

    At a nighttime news conference, Police Chief Bob Day said the FBI was leading the investigation and he had no details about the events that led to the shooting.

    Mayor Keith Wilson and the City Council called on ICE to end all operations in Oregon’s largest city until a full investigation is completed.

    “We stand united as elected officials in saying that we cannot sit by while constitutional protections erode and bloodshed mounts,” they said in a statement. “Portland is not a ‘training ground’ for militarized agents, and the ‘full force’ threatened by the administration has deadly consequences.”

    Wilson also suggested at a news conference that he does not necessarily believe the federal government’s account of the shooting: “There was a time we could take them at their word. That time is long past.”

    Democratic State Sen. Kayse Jama, who lives near where it took place, said Oregon is a welcoming state — but he told federal agents to leave.

    “You are not welcome,” Jama said. “You need to get the hell out of Oregon.”

    The city officials said “federal militarization undermines effective, community‑based public safety, and it runs counter to the values that define our region. We’ll use every legal and legislative tool available to protect our residents’ civil and human rights.”

    They urged residents to show up with “calm and purpose during this difficult time.”

    Several dozen people gathered in the evening near the scene where police found the wounded people.

    “It’s just been chaos,” said one, Anjalyssa Jones. “The community is trying to get answers.”

    U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, urged protesters to remain peaceful.

    “Trump wants to generate riots,” he said on the social platform X. “Don’t take the bait.”