Blog

The National Rifle Association is suing its own charitable wing in federal court, alleging that the nonprofit NRA Foundation, which it founded in 1990, is unfairly using the NRA logo to attract a rival donor base and undercut it.

The lawsuit, filed Monday in federal court, marks the latest strife for the gun rights group, which has been trying to balance its books and rebuild its reputation after years of misspending, allegations of corruption, and internal conflict.

The suit alleges that the NRA’s official charity was “seized by a disgruntled faction of former NRA directors who lost control of the NRA’s Board.”

The filing accuses the foundation’s leadership of misleading donors by suggesting that they were supporting the NRA, when in fact the funds were going to a charity that the NRA alleges had been transformed into “a vehicle for personal reprisal.” It also says the NRA Foundation was using the NRA’s trademark without permission.

The NRA Foundation did not respond to a request for comment about the lawsuit early Tuesday.

“This is a disappointing day, and it should not have come to this,” NRA CEO Doug Hamlin said in an emailed statement. “A foundation established to support the National Rifle Association of America has taken actions that are adversarial at a time when the NRA is rebuilding and focused on its long-term mission,” he said, describing the lawsuit as a “last resort.”

In the lawsuit, attorneys for the NRA ask a judge to prevent the foundation from unfairly competing with the NRA, as well as order the foundation to stop using the NRA’s trademarks and pay an unspecified sum in damages.

Monday’s court filings marked the latest explosion of internal warfare at the group, whose finances have been ravaged in recent years. According to campaign data tracker OpenSecrets, the NRA spent $11 million in the 2024 elections, one-third of its 2020 spending and less than one-fifth of its 2016 spending.

In February 2024, a jury in New York found that Wayne LaPierre, the NRA’s longtime leader who resigned on the eve of the trial, had squandered funds on vacations, private jets, and designer clothes and was liable to pay $5.4 million in damages. Former CFO Wilson “Woody” Phillips was ordered to pay $2 million in damages.

Some weeks later, the NRA avoided a second trial by reaching a settlement with the D.C. district attorney, agreeing to reform how the NRA Foundation distributed money. That lawsuit had accused the charity of funneling millions of dollars without proper oversight back to the NRA. The NRA did not acknowledge any wrongdoing in the settlement and had denied the lawsuit’s claims in court filings.

According to the lawsuit, the foundation’s chairman and the majority of its trustees are former NRA board members who were allied with LaPierre. It accused the charity of being “stacked with trustees associated with the Old Guard faction that had lost control of the NRA, including Foundation Chairman Tom King, whom NRA members had voted off of the NRA Board in 2024.”

King declined to provide an immediate comment on the suit Tuesday morning.

The NRA has been trying to turn a new leaf on a painful chapter in its 155-year-old history. In recent years, many of the group’s former critics have joined the NRA’s 76-member board, which likes to call itself “NRA 2.0.” In November, it announced plans to furlough more than 30 staff members in a bid to save about $16 million.

It was not immediately clear how Monday’s lawsuit would affect the link between the NRA and the NRA Foundation. The NRA’s website continued on Tuesday to prominently promote a link to “Friends of NRA,” the foundation’s main fundraising program.

The NRA Foundation’s annual report for the 2024 calendar year, its most recent, listed net assets exceeding $200 million and annual revenue of $41 million.

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s board of directors voted to dissolve the organization, officials announced Monday, ending the 58-year-old agency that distributed federal funds to NPR, PBS and more than 1,500 local public radio and television stations.,

The move formalizes the shutdown that began this summer after Republicans in Congress rescinded $1.1 billion in funding at President Donald Trump’s behest. At the heart of the campaign was a long-standing conservative critique that public media outfits produce news that is liberal, biased, and should not be funded by taxpayer dollars.

CPB leaders said they chose dissolution over maintaining a dormant organization that could become manipulated by new stewards acting without public media’s best interest at heart.

“CPB’s final act would be to protect the integrity of the public media system and the democratic values by dissolving, rather than allowing the organization to remain defunded and vulnerable to additional attacks,” said Patricia Harrison, CPB’s president and chief executive.

Ruby Calvert, chair of CPB’s board, called the defunding “devastating” but expressed hope that “a new Congress will address public media’s role in our country because it is critical to our children’s education, our history, culture, and democracy to do so.”

Created by Congress through the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, CPB served as a middleman between taxpayers and public media, distributing most of its appropriations directly to local stations. The funding was particularly crucial for small and rural stations, which relied on federal dollars for a significant share of their budgets. The organization also negotiated music rights and procured technical infrastructure on behalf of stations — functions that now have no clear successor.

CPB said it would complete distribution of its remaining funds and support the American Archive of Public Broadcasting in digitizing and preserving historical content. The organization’s own archives, dating to its 1967 founding, will be maintained in partnership with the University of Maryland.

The organization’s closure caps months of turmoil for the public media system. In April, CPB sued the Trump administration after the president attempted to fire three of its board members, arguing it was not a government agency subject to presidential authority. In May, Trump signed an executive order instructing CPB to halt all funding to NPR and PBS, calling them “biased media.” NPR and PBS sued, arguing the order amounted to unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination.

In September, after Congress passed its rescission bill, CPB announced it would redirect $57.9 million in satellite funding away from NPR to Public Media Infrastructure, a newly formed nonprofit backed by other public radio organizations, including PRX and American Public Media.

In response, NPR sued its longtime ally CPB, arguing the move improperly allocated funds meant for NPR and violated the Public Broadcasting Act and was made under pressure from the Trump White House — a claim CPB disputed. The parties settled in November, with NPR receiving nearly $36 million for its satellite system. NPR also said it would waive fees derived from public radio stations for accessing its satellite services for the next two years.

PBS has had staff cuts and NPR has reportedly made budget cuts. But for local stations that relied on CPB for a large share of their budgets, the federal funding cuts have been devastating.

Major foundations, including Knight, MacArthur and Ford, have pledged tens of millions of dollars in emergency funding to keep the most vulnerable stations afloat, but some are already considering dropping national programming or shutting down entirely.

NJ PBS, New Jersey’s public television network, announced in September that it may close next year, while Arkansas Public Television dropped its PBS affiliation — just as several public radio stations have dropped their NPR affiliation — showing that federal defunding has destabilized a system scrambling for answers.

NPR, PBS, and the White House did not respond to requests for comment.