Tag: no-latest

  • I’m a gastroenterologist. Here are some surprising GLP-1 gut benefits. | Expert Opinion

    I’m a gastroenterologist. Here are some surprising GLP-1 gut benefits. | Expert Opinion

    Q: I’m worried that GLP-1s are bad for my gut. Should I avoid them altogether for this reason?

    A: In the original clinical trials of GLP-1 medications for weight loss, the most common side effects were gastrointestinal, including nausea, vomiting, and constipation. Ask almost anyone who’s been on one, and they’ll probably tell you that they’ve had some GI issues — even if very mild.

    So you might be surprised that as a gastroenterologist, when my patients tell me they’re considering starting a GLP-1 (the class of drug that includes Ozempic, Wegovy, and Zepbound, among others), my answer is often highly enthusiastic: Do. It.

    We hear all the time about the weight loss or heart health benefits of GLP-1s, but as a scientist who studies GLP-1 and the stomach in my own laboratory, I’ve seen firsthand how powerful and beneficial they can be for gut health. The GI effects of GLP-1s that I wish more people talked about? Randomized controlled trials have found that they can, in some cases, improve outcomes for people with fatty liver disease and fibrosis — or liver scarring — which previously no drugs could reliably achieve.

    GLP-1s are also associated with a lower risk of stomach ulcers, according to research I conducted with my colleagues and — here’s a big one — they’re linked to lower odds of colorectal cancer. Many of these potential associated benefits are unrelated to weight loss, although the weight loss alone can start a cascade of wins.

    For example, one of my patients who started a GLP-1 lost about 20 pounds after six months. Losing that 20 pounds helped her knees, which had been aching all the time, and allowed her to begin exercising regularly. She began walking daily and then, before long, joined a Zumba class. This would have been unheard of for her before taking a GLP-1. Now, even though her weight has remained steady, she’s a healthier person because she stays active, something that lowers the risk of cancer and heart disease regardless of her weight.

    That doesn’t mean I downplay the GI issues, rather in my practice, I anticipate them and make a proactive plan. With each patient, I have an honest discussion about the possibility of unwanted side effects, including the possibility of more serious, although rare, complications such as pancreatitis.

    Let’s be real: The majority of people taking GLP-1s do experience symptoms like nausea or constipation. However, in most cases, these symptoms are mild to moderate and transient: Fewer than 5% of people stop treatment because of GI symptoms. So if someone wants to stick with their GLP-1, I like to help give them every chance I can. And with a pill version of Wegovy now available, they’re going to become increasingly accessible.

    Everyone interested in GLP-1s should have that clear-minded discussion with their own physician who knows their own medical history and goals. To help start that conversation, here are some of the most common questions I get:

    What exactly are GLP-1 medications doing to my gut?

    You’ve probably heard that GLP-1, or glucagonlike peptide 1, is a hormone produced by the body that is involved in hunger signaling. But GLP-1 medications do so much more than this. For instance, they suppress stomach acid production and fortify the protective mucus layer along the stomach’s lining, which is at least partly how scientists like myself hypothesize they may help reduce the risk of ulcers. Perhaps most evident to anyone taking them is that GLP-1s slow the stomach down. As a result, food sits inside longer before it gets emptied into the small intestine, and that can create an uncomfortable sense of fullness and queasiness. (Hello, Ozempic burps!) A similar slowing occurs in the colon. Because one of the colon’s primary jobs is to absorb water, the longer the waste sits there, the drier and harder it becomes. Hence, constipation.

    We still have much to learn about GLP-1’s other effects on the gut and body. How GLP-1 medication influence our microbiome is an emerging area of research, but some limited studies in humans suggest that they may influence the production of beneficial bacterial metabolites. They also appear to help reduce chronic inflammation, which plays a big role in multiple diseases.

    How can I treat the unwanted side effects?

    You should explore possible treatments with your physician, who can make tailored recommendations. The goal isn’t for you to “suffer through” therapy with GLP-1 in the name of good health, but to make taking a GLP-1 drug as sustainable as possible. I tell my patients when starting these drugs to expect side effects and plan for them. And no, GI symptoms like nausea are not what drives weight loss, so don’t hold back seeking help.

    Let your hunger cues guide you

    Contrary to how many of us eat otherwise, when taking a GLP-1 it’s important to try to eat only when actually hungry, eat slowly, and respond to your body’s cues saying you’re full. It’s common for people to eat smaller portions than they’re used to, but still feel satisfied.

    Be proactive about bowel issues

    Anyone who struggles with their bowel movements at baseline, speak up now: We need to be especially proactive. Sometimes it’s as simple as starting a daily fiber supplement, which can be helpful for diarrhea or constipation (both are possible with GLP-1s). In the case of constipation, over-the-counter laxatives like a capful of powdered polyethylene glycol (like in Miralax) can help, while for diarrhea, loperamide (like in Imodium) can be great. But don’t give up if these feel inadequate — there are also several prescription medications that can help get your colon back on track.

    Try OTC remedies for nausea and heartburn

    For nausea, sometimes the fix can be to simply lower the dose of the GLP-1 you’re taking, although there are medications that can help. Over-the-counter remedies like bismuth subsalicylate (like in Pepto-Bismol), dimenhydrinate (like in Dramamine), or ginger tea can provide quick relief. If these are insufficient, your doctor may consider prescription antinausea medications. Because of the delay in stomach emptying, heartburn can also show up, but over-the-counter treatments like histamine-2 blockers (like Pepcid AC and Zantac 360) can help.

    Who is more likely to experience side effects?

    In real-world studies of people taking these medications, men appear to have half the risk of experiencing GI side effects as women. The most important advice to avoid side effects is to start on a low dose and increase slowly.

    Are certain GLP-1s more likely to cause side effects?

    Head-to-head trials comparing semaglutide (Ozempic, Wegovy) with liraglutide (Victoza, Saxenda) show broadly similar GI side effects overall, though results vary somewhat by study and dose. The good news is that major trials have found that these side effects were more common in the first few days or weeks of starting treatment, when they peaked, but then tended to subside. So I tell my patients that even if they experience GI symptoms initially, there’s a good chance they’ll get better.

    What I want my patients to know

    GLP-1 drugs are often spoken of as weight loss tools but, to me, that really misses the point. Obesity is a chronic, inflammatory disease that drives up the risk of heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, and certain cancers. Using a medication to treat a medical condition is not a moral failing — as some of my patients have been made to feel. There are fewer more powerful steps someone can take for their health than to reduce that constant state of inflammation, and as a doctor, I will always find that worth celebrating and supporting.

    Trisha Pasricha is an assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and author of the forthcoming book “You’ve Been Pooping All Wrong.”

  • Letters to the Editor | Jan. 22, 2026

    Letters to the Editor | Jan. 22, 2026

    Immigration enforcement

    The primary responsibility of law enforcement is to ensure the safety and security of its citizens.

    Cooperation between jurisdictions and among all levels of law enforcement is a key component in obtaining that objective in our democracy. When state and local elected officials prevent their police from cooperating with federal officers enforcing federal law while allowing lawbreaking illegal aliens to roam their streets, it creates a dangerous situation for all involved — as we clearly see now. Through their inflammatory rhetoric, they incite and condone the type of resistance and violence against federal law enforcement that they would not tolerate if directed at their own police officers. Their words “inspire” Renee Good and many like her to put themselves in harm’s way while impeding U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement efforts illegally. Liberals decry Good’s death while curiously being silent when members of their community were the victims of murder and violent crime at the hands of illegal immigrants. It is a sad commentary on sanctuary states and cities when the plight of illegals is prioritized over the safety of their actual citizens.

    What kind of democracy do we have where so many of these liberal elected officials ignore their oaths of office to defend the Constitution by obeying only the laws that they agree with?

    Mark Fenstermaker, Warminster, markfense@gmail.com

    Wait, he said what?

    “The moment you start dehumanizing people, the moment you start calling people Hitler, the moment you start doing that, it’s a slippery slope to violence,” Republican U.S. Sen. Dave McCormick said during a recent interview with CBS.

    If I‘m reading this quote right, Sen. McCormick is saying if you call ICE Hitler, you’re going to get Hitler. That’s the problem in the first place: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is operating like the Gestapo. All rhetoric aside, an American mother was killed on the streets of an American city while exercising her constitutional right to protest. How can anyone be OK with that?

    Michael Galante, Philadelphia

    Investigation warranted

    The U.S. Department of Justice has said it will not be investigating the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who killed Renee Good in Minneapolis. In Philadelphia, if a police officer discharges their weapon, it automatically triggers an Internal Affairs investigation, and I believe that is true for all local law enforcement agencies.

    I retired from a federal law enforcement agency under the DOJ, and any use of force automatically triggered an investigation and after-action review by the Office of Inspector General (OIG). ICE is an agency under the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. I have not seen any reports of the DHS OIG investigating this use-of-force incident.

    Julio Casiano Jr., Philadelphia

    New precedent?

    Since Donald Trump’s invasion and arrest (kidnapping?) of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, I have been thinking about an analogy that could put this in a different context for Trump supporters.

    Let’s go back to 1970. We are deep in the midst of the war we were carrying out against Vietnam. What if the North Vietnamese sent a secret commando force to Washington, D.C., and captured Richard Nixon, brought him to Hanoi, and put him on trial for crimes against humanity? Whatever we might think of him, Maduro was the head of state in Venezuela. If another country did to our head of state what we did to him, we would be outraged, too.

    Peter Handler, Philadelphia

    Join the conversation: Send letters to letters@inquirer.com. Limit length to 150 words and include home address and day and evening phone number. Letters run in The Inquirer six days a week on the editorial pages and online.

  • Dear Abby | Couple’s marriage mired in the doldrums of middle age

    DEAR ABBY: My husband and I have been together 30-plus years. When our love was new, it was all smiles, hand-holding and thrills when we saw each other after a long day at work or school. And, I guess, that’s normal.

    Now, three kids and three grandkids later, we’re edging past our mid-50s and there isn’t much left. There are no more smiles and no more hand-holding, only two sad adults. We still love each other. Neither of us wants to be apart from the other, but we don’t know how to bring back happiness.

    We hardly touch, and neither of us remembers the last time we smiled or even really laughed. We sit in the same room, living two completely different lives. I am partially disabled, so there are no more long walks or outside activities, which we used to do 20 years ago.

    We are now wondering: Is this the rest of our lives? Are we going to spend the next 20-plus years in a depressing marriage in which we love each other but no longer have anything in common? Our youngest daughter is 8, and our youngest grandson is 5. We watch the kids (15, 9, 8, 5) in the evening so our eldest can work. Is there any hope for us?

    — SAD SPOUSE IN NEW YORK

    DEAR SAD SPOUSE: You say that you and your husband love each other. There is hope for reviving your marriage if you agree to go to couples counseling together. Marriage involves more than smiles, hand-holding and thrills. It is a deep and caring partnership. Few couples can sustain the excitement of their honeymoon years. You and your husband have already done the hard work. Now you need to find your way back together.

    ** ** **

    DEAR ABBY: My husband and I were dining with friends in a high-end restaurant. The food was great, and so was the conversation. My husband leaned close to me and whispered, “She’s brushing her teeth!” I glanced to my left. I had thought the gal at the next table was just using a toothpick. No, she was vigorously brushing with a full-sized toothbrush!

    After about a minute, she placed the toothbrush into a cosmetic bag and pulled out a denture container. She then proceeded to insert and adjust her retainer. We were flabbergasted. Never in all my years have I seen such appalling table manners. Perhaps we shouldn’t have been staring, but it was one of those moments in which you are frozen to the spot.

    Abby, that restaurant has very nice bathrooms. What is happening to our society?

    — SHOCKED IN THE SOUTH

    DEAR SHOCKED: I understand why this woman’s performance stopped you cold. But, please, don’t blame “society” for her ignorance of the rules of etiquette, which dictate that to avoid grossing out those around us in public, we should excuse ourselves from the table and take care of our oral hygiene privately, IN THE RESTROOM if needed.

  • Horoscopes: Thursday, Jan. 22, 2026

    ARIES (March 21-April 19). You’re not trying to be unique or edgy — it just so happens that you resonate with topics that many people haven’t even heard of yet. It will be fun and fortifying to connect with those who share your interest.

    TAURUS (April 20-May 20). You’re starting to question your fit in an organization or a particular role. You’re not exactly a fish out of water, but you may be a polar bear out of Alaska. The key here is to limit your time in the environment. Take lots of breaks. Is it possible to get a vacation?

    GEMINI (May 21-June 21). These are stubborn conditions, and stubborn people populate the landscape. They have something to give, but you won’t know what it is until you let go of what you want it to be. So instead of needing events to line up a certain way, you let go of expectation.

    CANCER (June 22-July 22). Socializing will be about answering the very human need to be seen and heard. Your story is an evolving one and you tell it differently depending on who is asking. Today, someone new will be curious about you.

    LEO (July 23-Aug. 22). The mood at 10 a.m. is very different from the mood at 4 p.m. — so different, in fact, you may feel like two different people. Does it help you to know it’s not an uncommon phenomenon? The world asks a lot of “a.m. you,” then “p.m. you” will ask a lot of the world.

    VIRGO (Aug. 23-Sept. 22). You’ll pull off complex plans with a simple approach: jump into and execute as you go. You’re also well aware that not everyone has access to experiences like this, and you’ll make the most of it.

    LIBRA (Sept. 23-Oct. 23). You’re touched by what’s around you and you’ll reconnect with possibility and a sense of aliveness. Just remember, no one comes into their own doing whatever everyone else does. Your artful approach will set you apart in the best way.

    SCORPIO (Oct. 24-Nov. 21). Your work will be better for the obstacles you face today. A lull will give you the chance to consider the part that you usually do automatically. This is just what you need to make things better than ever.

    SAGITTARIUS (Nov. 22-Dec. 21). You want a feeling you felt before, but for some reason it’s not there. Don’t force it. This is the new you, not the old you, and you are sensitive in other ways you have yet to learn about.

    CAPRICORN (Dec. 22-Jan. 19). It’s nice to have assistance and support, but if you don’t get it today, you’ll get something even better. You’ll learn what you’re made of. You’ll dig deeper for your own true grit, which is the abiding resource that will never leave you.

    AQUARIUS (Jan. 20-Feb. 18). The French culinary term “mise en place” will apply to your current project. Get all the elements ready for use. In cooking it means peeling, cutting and measuring your ingredients, but for your current project it’s readying other resources, including your team.

    PISCES (Feb. 19-March 20). Your imagination is active and responsive. You’ll gather a subtle impression from a situation, then let intuition guide your decisions without overanalyzing. The day will arrange itself in supportive ways.

    TODAY’S BIRTHDAY (Jan. 22). It will be fun to know you inspire envy along with the other benefits your hard work reels in this Year of the Big Finish. You’ll be crossing the metaphorical finish line with several projects and goals, and the prize comes in money and position, hearts won and security attained. More highlights: cash through something simple, fun gatherings and beautifully supportive friendships. Aries and Capricorn adore you. Your lucky numbers are: 38, 42, 11, 4 and 18.

  • Washington Post seeks court order for government to return electronics seized from reporter’s home

    Washington Post seeks court order for government to return electronics seized from reporter’s home

    WASHINGTON — The Washington Post asked a federal court on Wednesday for an order requiring federal authorities to return electronic devices that they seized from a Post reporter’s Virginia home last week, accusing the government of trampling on the reporter’s free speech rights and legal safeguards for journalists.

    A magistrate judge in Alexandria, Va., temporarily barred the government from reviewing any material from the devices seized from Post reporter Hannah Natanson’s home. The judge also scheduled a Feb. 6 hearing on the newspaper’s request.

    Federal agents seized a phone, two laptops, a recorder, a portable hard drive, and a Garmin smart watch when they searched Natanson’s home last Wednesday, according to a court filing. The search was part of an investigation of a Pentagon contractor accused of illegally handling classified information.

    “The outrageous seizure of our reporter’s confidential newsgathering materials chills speech, cripples reporting, and inflicts irreparable harm every day the government keeps its hands on these materials,” the Post said in a statement.

    The seized material spanned years of Natanson’s reporting across hundreds of stories, including communications with confidential sources, the Post said. The newspaper asked the court in Virginia to order the immediate return of all seized materials and to bar the government from using any of it.

    “Anything less would license future newsroom raids and normalize censorship by search warrant,” the Post’s court filing says.

    The Pentagon contractor, Aurelio Luis Perez-Lugones, was arrested earlier this month on a charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents. A warrant said the search of Natanson’s home was related to the investigation of Perez-Lugones, the Post reported.

    Natanson has been covering Republican President Donald Trump’s transformation of the federal government, The Post recently published a piece in which she described gaining hundreds of new sources from the federal workforce, leading one colleague to call her “the federal government whisperer.”

    Attorney General Pam Bondi said that the search was done at the request of the Defense Department and that the journalist was “obtaining and reporting classified and illegally leaked information from a Pentagon contractor.”

    Perez-Lugones, a U.S. Navy veteran who resides in Laurel, Md., has not been charged with sharing classified information or accused in court papers of leaking.

    The Justice Department has internal guidelines governing its response to news media leaks. In April, Bondi issued new guidelines restoring prosecutors’ authority to use subpoenas, court orders and search warrants to hunt for government officials who make “unauthorized disclosures” to journalists.

    The new guidelines rescinded a policy from Democratic President Joe Biden’s administration that protected journalists from having their phone records secretly seized during leak investigations.

    Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press president Bruce Brown said the unprecedented search of the reporter’s home, “imperils public interest reporting and will have ramifications far beyond this specific case.”

    “It is critical that the court blocks the government from searching through this material until it can address the profound threat to the First Amendment posed by the raid,” Brown said in a statement Wednesday.

  • Supreme Court appears likely to allow Lisa Cook to remain on Fed board

    Supreme Court appears likely to allow Lisa Cook to remain on Fed board

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared likely to block President Donald Trump from immediately firing Democratic-appointed Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve board, a move that would prevent Trump from exerting greater influence over the powerful central bank that guides the economy.

    Nearly all of the justices asked skeptical questions of Solicitor General D. John Sauer during roughly two hours of arguments, taking issue with most aspects of the government’s case that the president had met the legal bar to remove Cook while a lawsuit challenging her removal plays out. Such unanimity is rare on high-profile cases for a deeply polarized court.

    Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh said the Trump administration’s position that it could remove Fed governors without judicial review or due process “would weaken if not shatter the independence of the Federal Reserve.” He said presidents of both parties could gin up reasons to remove governors under such a system with dangerous implications for a central bank that Congress created to operate independently.

    “It incentivizes a president to come up with … trivial or inconsequential or old allegations that are very difficult to disprove,” Kavanaugh said. “It incentivizes sort of the search and destroy … no process, nothing, you’re done … what are we doing when we have a system that incentivizes that?”

    The president has complained for months that the Fed is not dropping interest rates quickly enough. He has tried to oust Cook over mortgage fraud allegations, and his Justice Department has launched a criminal probe of Fed Chair Jerome Powell over whether he lied to Congress.

    Both Cook and Powell have denied wrongdoing and accused Trump of manufacturing pretexts to undermine the independence of the central bank to achieve his policy goals. The campaign has alarmed many economists, who fear keeping interest rates artificially low could spark long-term inflation.

    The Supreme Court’s ruling, which is expected in the coming weeks or months, is one of the most significant tests to date of Trump’s push to expand presidential power and place parts of the government that for decades have operated independently under tighter control. It could also have major ramifications for the economy and is being closely watched by businesses and the markets.

    In a sign of the stakes, both Powell and Cook attended the arguments, as did former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke.

    The justices have repeatedly backed Trump’s bids to fire the heads of independent agencies in emergency rulings in his second term, but in a major shift Wednesday justices at both ends of the court’s political spectrum seemed ready to draw a red line around the Fed. Many signaled that they wanted additional legal proceedings, perhaps in the lower courts, before deciding a novel and weighty legal issue on the merits, while Chief Justice John Roberts signaled he might favor going ahead and ruling.

    Conservative Justice Samuel Alito asked Sauer why the Trump administration was asking the court to resolve such a momentous case in a “hurried manner.” Justice Amy Coney Barrett, also a conservative, pointed to a friend-of-the-court brief by former Fed governors warning that removing Cook could trigger a recession and counseled caution.

    Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the public’s confidence in the court’s decision would benefit from hashing out significant factual and legal issues before issuing a decision.

    “We know that the independence of the agency is very important and that that independence is harmed if we decide these issues too quickly and without due consideration.” Sotomayor said.

    Congress set up the Fed to be insulated from control by the president so it could make difficult decisions, such as raising interest rates, that might not be politically popular but that are good for the overall health of the economy.

    No president in the 112-year history of the Fed had tried to fire a governor from the board before Trump targeted Cook in August. He alleged that she claimed two homes as primary residences at the same time to get a better mortgage rate. Cook denies the allegations.

    The issue before the justices was whether the effort to fire her complied with the Federal Reserve Act, which says Fed board members can be removed only “for cause.” A federal judge and a divided appeals court temporarily blocked Cook’s removal, prompting the administration to appeal to the high court.

    In October, the justices allowed Cook to temporarily remain in her job while they heard the emergency appeal from the Trump administration.

    Sauer told the justices that the alleged mortgage fraud by Cook met the legal bar to remove her and that the president had lost confidence in her ability to do the job. He also said courts did not have the authority to review the president’s decision, a contention a handful of the justices disputed.

    “The American people should not have their interest rates determined by someone who was, at best, grossly negligent in obtaining favorable interest rates for herself,” Sauer said.

    Paul Clement, Cook’s attorney, said judges did have the power to review Cook’s ouster. He also said the mortgage fraud allegations, even if true, would not meet the legal bar to fire Cook, because she applied for her mortgages before she was appointed to the Fed by President Joe Biden in 2022. He added that Cook was never given the opportunity to defend herself.

    “There is no reason to abandon more than 100 years of central bank independence on an emergency application,” Clement said.

    The justices quizzed attorneys for both sides about what the removal of a Fed governor should entail, often questioning whether the Trump administration had provided due process for Cook.

    Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a liberal, sounded incredulous when Sauer said it was enough that the president had indicated on social media that he intended to fire Cook. Jackson asked how Cook was supposed to defend herself from the allegations without some kind of hearing.

    “Like, she was supposed to post about it [on social media] and that was the opportunity to be heard?” Jackson asked.

    David Wilcox, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and the director of U.S. economic research at Bloomberg Economics, said he expects the justices to send the case back to lower courts. He said the lower courts need to resolve a key procedural question: whether Cook was afforded adequate process, such as notice that she could be fired and an opportunity to be heard.

    “My guess is what the court will do is kick the can down the road,” he said, adding that it is risky to predict the outcome of the case based on oral arguments alone.

    Some legal experts said administration officials may have damaged their chances by launching the criminal probe of Powell earlier this month, creating the impression that Trump’s efforts are more about reshaping the Fed board and policy than any alleged malfeasance by its leaders.

    The Justice Department is probing whether Powell misled Congress about a $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed’s headquarters. Powell forcefully pushed back on those allegations, calling them “pretexts” in a video posted on the Fed’s website.

    “The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President,” Powell said.

    The arguments Wednesday were a notable shift from a case in December dealing with the legality of Trump’s firing of a Democrat from the Federal Trade Commission without cause. That case could also affect Cook’s job at the Fed.

    In that case, Sauer told the justices that Trump had the inherent authority under the Constitution to remove members of independent agency boards, even though Congress set up those agencies to operate at a remove from the executive.

    Some of the court’s conservative justices and many in the Trump administration have expressed support for an idea known as unitary executive theory, which holds that the Constitution gives the president broad authority to fire officials and that Congress cannot limit it.

    Agencies like the FTC, Securities and Exchange Commission, and Federal Election Commission operate as “a headless fourth branch” of government not fully accountable to the voters who elected the president, Sauer told the justices in the FTC case.

    The conservative majority on the court seemed to embrace that argument, possibly clearing the way for them to strike down a 90-year-old precedent, known as Humphrey’s Executor, that says that Congress could limit the president’s ability to dismiss the heads of independent agencies.

    “I think broad delegations to unaccountable independent agencies raise enormous constitutional and real-world problems for individual liberty,” said Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh.

    But Kavanaugh also suggested that the court sees the central bank as different and might carve out a rule protecting it. Whether it affects the Fed, a ruling striking down Humphrey’s Executor would be one of the largest shifts to the structure of government in decades. A decision in that case is also expected by the summer.

    Some Fed watchers said Wednesday the Cook case appeared unlikely to deal a fatal blow to the central bank’s independence. They also warned that the Fed is increasingly on the defensive – reacting to political pressure rather than setting the terms – and that without pushback from Congress and the markets, Trump could continue reshaping the institution in ways that erode its autonomy.

    “It sounds to me that this case will not be the Waterloo for Fed independence,” said Mark Spindel, an investment manager who co-wrote a history of the central bank’s independence. “But the institution is clearly playing defense.”

  • Immigration officers assert sweeping power to enter homes without a judge’s warrant, memo says

    Immigration officers assert sweeping power to enter homes without a judge’s warrant, memo says

    WASHINGTON — Federal immigration officers are asserting sweeping power to forcibly enter people’s homes without a judge’s warrant, according to an internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo obtained by The Associated Press, marking a sharp reversal of longstanding guidance meant to respect constitutional limits on government searches.

    The memo authorizes ICE officers to use force to enter a residence based solely on a more narrow administrative warrant to arrest someone with a final order of removal, a move that advocates say collides with Fourth Amendment protections and upends years of advice given to immigrant communities.

    The shift comes as the Trump administration dramatically expands immigration arrests nationwide, deploying thousands of officers under a mass deportation campaign that is already reshaping enforcement tactics in cities such as Minneapolis.

    For years, immigrant advocates, legal aid groups and local governments have urged people not to open their doors to immigration agents unless they are shown a warrant signed by a judge. That guidance is rooted in Supreme Court rulings that generally prohibit law enforcement from entering a home without judicial approval. The ICE directive directly undercuts that advice at a time when arrests are accelerating under the administration’s immigration crackdown.

    The memo itself has not been widely shared within the agency, according to a whistleblower complaint, but its contents have been used to train new ICE officers who are being deployed into cities and towns to implement the president’s immigration crackdown. New ICE hires and those still in training are being told to follow the memo’s guidance instead of written training materials that actually contradict the memo, according to the whistleblower disclosure.

    It is unclear how broadly the directive has been applied in immigration enforcement operations. The Associated Press witnessed ICE officers ramming through the front door of the home of a Liberian man in Minneapolis on Jan. 11 with only an administrative warrant, wearing heavy tactical gear and with their rifles drawn.

    The change is almost certain to meet legal challenges and stiff criticism from advocacy groups and immigrant-friendly state and local governments that have spent years successfully urging people not to open their doors unless ICE shows them a warrant signed by a judge.

    The Associated Press obtained the memo and whistleblower complaint from an official in Congress, who shared it on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive documents. The AP verified the authenticity of the accounts in the complaint.

    The memo, signed by the acting director of ICE, Todd Lyons, and dated May 12, 2025, says: “Although the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has not historically relied on administrative warrants alone to arrest aliens subject to final orders of removal in their place of residence, the DHS Office of the General Counsel has recently determined that the U.S. Constitution, the Immigration and Nationality Act, and the immigration regulations do not prohibit relying on administrative warrants for this purpose.”

    The memo does not detail how that determination was made nor what its legal repercussions might be.

    When asked about the memo, Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said in an emailed statement to the AP that everyone the department serves with an administrative warrant has already had “full due process and a final order of removal.”

    She said the officers issuing those warrants have also found probable cause for the person’s arrest. She said the Supreme Court and Congress have “recognized the propriety of administrative warrants in cases of immigration enforcement,” without elaborating. McLaughlin did not respond to questions about whether ICE officers entered a person’s home since the memo was issued relying solely on an administrative warrant and if so, how often.

    Recent arrests shine a light on tactics

    Whistleblower Aid, a nonprofit legal organization that assists workers exposing wrongdoings, said in the whistleblower complaint obtained by The Associated Press that it represents two anonymous U.S. government officials “disclosing a secretive — and seemingly unconstitutional – policy directive.”

    A wave of recent high-profile arrests, many unfolding at private homes and businesses and captured on video, has shined a spotlight on immigration arrest tactics, including officers’ use of proper warrants.

    Most immigration arrests are carried out under administrative warrants, internal documents issued by immigration authorities that authorize the arrest of a specific individual but do not permit officers to forcibly enter private homes or other non-public spaces without consent. Only warrants signed by judges carry that authority.

    All law enforcement operations — including those conducted by ICE and Customs and Border Protection — are governed by the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, which protects all people in the country from unreasonable searches and seizures.

    People can legally refuse federal immigration agents entry into private property if the agents only have an administrative warrant, with some limited exceptions.

    Federal agents this month rammed the door of the Minneapolis home of a Liberian man with a deportation order from 2023, who was then arrested. Documents reviewed by The AP revealed that the agents only had an administrative warrant — meaning there was no judge who authorized the raid on private property.

    Memo shown to ‘select’ officials

    The memo says ICE officers can forcibly enter homes and arrest immigrants using just a signed administrative warrant known as an I-205 if they have a final order of removal issued by an immigration judge, the Board of Immigration Appeals or a district judge or magistrate judge.

    The memo says officers must first knock on the door and share who they are and why they’re at the residence. They’re limited in the hours they can go into the home — after 6 a.m. and before 10 p.m. The people inside must be given a “reasonable chance to act lawfully.” But if that doesn’t work, the memo says, they can use force to go in.

    “Should the alien refuse admittance, ICE officers and agents should use only a necessary and reasonable amount of force to enter the alien’s residence, following proper notification of the officer or agent’s authority and intent to enter,” the memo reads.

    The memo is addressed to all ICE personnel. But it has been shown only to “select DHS officials” who then shared it with some employees who were told to read it and return it, Whistleblower Aid wrote in the disclosure.

    One of the two whistleblowers was allowed to view the memo only in the presence of a supervisor and then had to give it back. That person was not allowed to take notes. A whistleblower was able to access the document and lawfully disclose to Congress, Whistleblower Aid said.

    Although the memo was issued in May, David Kligerman, senior vice president and special counsel at Whistleblower Aid, said it took time for its clients to find a “safe and legal path to disclose it to lawmakers and the American people.”

    ICE told to rely on administrative warrants, memo says

    ICE has been rapidly hiring thousands of new deportation officers to carry out the president’s mass deportation agenda. They’re trained at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Brunswick, Georgia.

    During a visit there by The Associated Press in August, ICE officials said repeatedly that new officers were being trained to follow the Fourth Amendment.

    But according to the whistleblowers’ account, newly hired ICE officers are being told they can rely solely on administrative warrants to enter homes to make arrests even though that conflicts with written Homeland Security training materials.

    ICE officers often wait for hours for the person they’re hoping to arrest to come outside so they can make the arrest on the sidewalk or at the person’s work — public places where they are allowed to operate without the risk of infringing on the person’s Fourth Amendment rights.

    Whistleblower Aid called the new policy a “complete break from the law” and said it undercuts the “Fourth Amendment and the rights it protects.”

  • Trump to meet with Zelensky as Ukraine endures a bitter winter after Russian attacks

    Trump to meet with Zelensky as Ukraine endures a bitter winter after Russian attacks

    KYIV, Ukraine — About 4,000 buildings in Kyiv remained without heating Wednesday, and nearly 60% of the Ukrainian capital was without power, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky said, after days of Russian bombardment of Ukraine’s power grid and as President Donald Trump prepared to hold talks with the Ukrainian leader.

    With temperatures falling as low as minus-4 F in Kyiv, Ukraine is seeing one of the coldest winters in years, deepening the hardship of Ukrainians almost four years after Russia launched a full-scale invasion.

    A yearlong push by the Trump administration to stop the fighting hasn’t yielded any breakthrough, despite the American president issuing a series of deadlines, though efforts were set to continue.

    Trump said at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland that he would meet Thursday with Zelensky.

    “I want to stop it,” Trump said of the fighting Wednesday. “It’s a horrible war.”

    U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff told The Associated Press on Wednesday that he plans to discuss peace proposals with Putin as well as hold talks with a Ukrainian delegation.

    “We need a peace,” Witkoff said at Davos.

    Putin confirmed late on Wednesday that Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner are expected in Moscow on Thursday for talks. The Russian leader said that Moscow and Washington, among other things, are discussing the possibility of using Russian assets frozen in the U.S. for rebuilding “territories damaged by the hostilities” after a peace agreement is reached.

    But with a dispute over Greenland’s future largely eclipsing other transatlantic issues at Davos, discussions about Ukraine’s defense looked likely to be sidelined.

    Zelensky said last week his envoys would try to finalize with U.S. officials documents for a proposed peace settlement that relate to postwar security guarantees and economic recovery.

    He added that the U.S. and Ukraine could sign the documents in Davos this week, but on Tuesday he said he wouldn’t be traveling to Switzerland and would focus on restoring power in Ukraine.

    Ukraine’s Cabinet of Ministers is allocating 2.56 billion hryvnias (almost $60 million) from a reserve fund to purchase generators, Prime Minister Yuliia Svyrydenko said Wednesday.

    NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte on Wednesday urged the 32-nation alliance’s military chiefs to press their national governments to supply desperately needed air defense systems to Ukraine, helping it fend off Russia’s aerial attacks.

    “Please use your influence to help your political masters to do even more,” Rutte said in a video message to top brass as they met at NATO’s Brussels headquarters.

    “Look deep into your stockpiles to see what more you can give to Ukraine, particularly air defense interceptors. The time really is now,” he said.

    Russia launched 97 drones and a ballistic missile at Ukraine overnight, the Ukrainian air force said.

    In the central Dnipropetrovsk region, attacks killed a 77-year-old man and a 72-year-old woman, according to Oleksandr Hanzha, head of the regional military administration.

    Russia’s Defense Ministry said that air defenses downed 75 Ukrainian drones over several regions.

    The international airports of Krasnodar, Sochi, Gelendzhik and Saratov briefly suspended flights overnight because of the drones.

    In Adygea, more than 120 miles from the Ukrainian border, a Ukrainian drone caused a fire at an apartment building that injured 11 people, including two children, according to Gov. Murat Kumpilov.

  • Immigration enforcement arrives in Maine as a court freezes restrictions on tactics in Minnesota

    Immigration enforcement arrives in Maine as a court freezes restrictions on tactics in Minnesota

    MINNEAPOLIS — Maine became the latest target of the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement crackdown, while a federal appeals court on Wednesday suspended a decision that prohibited federal officers from using tear gas or pepper spray against peaceful protesters in Minnesota.

    The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was persuaded to freeze a judge’s ruling that bars retaliation against the public in Minnesota, including detaining people who follow agents in cars, while the government pursues an appeal. Operation Metro Surge, an immigration enforcement operation in Minnesota’s Twin Cities, has been underway for weeks.

    Attorney General Pam Bondi praised the appeals court on X, saying the Justice Department “will protect federal law enforcement agents from criminals in the streets AND activist judges in the courtroom.”

    Minnesota is a major focus of immigration sweeps by agencies under the Department of Homeland Security. State and local officials who oppose the effort were served with federal grand jury subpoenas Tuesday for records that might suggest they were trying to stifle enforcement.

    A political action committee founded by former Vice President Kamala Harris is urging donors to contribute to a defense fund in aid of Gov. Tim Walz, her 2024 running mate.

    “The Justice Department is going after Trump’s enemies,” Harris’ email said, referring to President Donald Trump.

    Feds turn to Maine as next target

    In Maine, the Department of Homeland Security named the enforcement operation Catch of the Day in an apparent play on the state’s seafood industry. Maine has relatively few residents who are in the United States illegally but has a notable presence of refugees in its largest cities, particularly from Africa.

    Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, a Democrat, said she won’t grant a request for confidential license plates sought by Customs and Border Protection, a decision that reflects her disgust over “abuses of power” by immigration enforcers. Renee Good was fatally shot by an ICE officer in Minneapolis on Jan. 7.

    “We have not revoked existing plates but have paused issuance of new plates. We want to be assured that Maine plates will not be used for lawless purposes,” Bellows said.

    A message seeking comment from CBP was not immediately returned.

    Portland City Council member Pious Ali, a native of Ghana, said there’s much anxiety about ICE’s presence in Maine’s largest city.

    “There are immigrants who live here who work in our hospitals, they work in our schools, they work in our hotels, they are part of the economic engine of our community,” Ali said.

    Conflicts emerge in shooting incident

    Greg Bovino of U.S. Border Patrol, who has commanded the Trump administration’s big-city immigration crackdown, said more than 10,000 people in the U.S. illegally have been arrested in Minnesota in the past year, including 3,000 “of some of the most dangerous offenders” in the last six weeks during Operation Metro Surge.

    Bovino defended his “troops” and said their actions are “legal, ethical and moral.”

    Julia Decker, policy director at the Immigrant Law Center of Minnesota, said advocates have no way of knowing whether the government’s arrest numbers and descriptions of the people in custody are accurate.

    Separately, a federal judge said he’s prepared to grant bond and release two men after hearing conflicting testimony about an alleged assault on an immigration officer. Prosecutors are appealing. One of the men was shot in the thigh by the officer during the encounter last week.

    The officer said he was repeatedly struck with a broom and with snow shovels while trying to subdue and arrest Alfredo Alejandro Aljorna following a car crash and foot chase.

    Aljorna and Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis denied assaulting the officer. Neither video evidence nor three eyewitnesses supported the officer’s account about the broom and shovels or that there had been a third person involved.

    Aljorna and Sosa-Celis do not have violent criminal records, their attorneys said, and both had been working as DoorDash drivers at night to avoid encounters with federal agents.

    U.S. Magistrate Judge Douglas Micko said they still could be detained by ICE even if released from custody in the assault case.

  • Trump’s Board of Peace is dividing countries in Europe and the Middle East

    Trump’s Board of Peace is dividing countries in Europe and the Middle East

    JERUSALEM — Divisions emerged Wednesday over President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace as its ambitions have grown beyond Gaza, with some Western European countries declining to join, others remaining noncommittal and a group of Muslim countries agreeing to sign on.

    The developments underscored European concerns over the expanded and divisive scope of the project — which some say may seek to rival the U.N. Security Council’s role in mediating global conflicts. Trump is looking to form the board officially this week on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

    Norway and Sweden said they won’t accept their invitations, after France also said no, while a bloc of Muslim-majority nations — Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates — said in a joint statement that their leaders would join.

    It was not immediately clear how many countries would accept. A White House official said about 30 countries were expected to join, and about 50 had been invited. Two other U.S. officials, who similiarly spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal plans not yet made public, said roughly 60 countries had been invited but only 18 had so far confirmed their participation.

    Trump was sunny about the prospects ahead of an event Thursday tied to the board, saying of the countries that were invited that “some need parliamentary approval but for the most part, everybody wants to be on.”

    Chaired by Trump, the board was originally conceived as a small group of world leaders overseeing the Gaza ceasefire plan. But the Trump administration’s ambitions have since expanded into a more sprawling concept, with Trump hinting at the board’s role as mediator for other global conflicts.

    Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he’s agreed to join the board — a departure from an earlier stance when his office criticized the makeup of another committee tasked with overseeing Gaza.

    Norway and Sweden say no, following in France’s footsteps

    Norway’s state secretary, Kristoffer Thoner, said the Scandinavian country would not join the board because it “raises a number of questions that requires further dialogue with the United States.”

    Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said on the sidelines of Davos that his country wouldn’t sign up for the board as the text currently stands, Swedish news agency TT reported, though the country hasn’t formally responded.

    Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said “the time has not yet come to accept the invitation,” according to the STA news agency. The main concern is the board’s mandate is too broad and could seriously undermine international order based on the U.N. Charter, Golob said.

    France declined the invitation earlier in the week. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said, “Yes to implementing the peace plan presented by the president of the United States, which we wholeheartedly support, but no to creating an organization as it has been presented, which would replace the United Nations.”

    The United Kingdom, the European Union’s executive arm, Canada, Russia, Ukraine and China also have not yet indicated their response to Trump’s invitations.

    Several in the Middle East and beyond say they will join

    Parties key to the Gaza ceasefire — Egypt and Israel — have said they would join the board, as have Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Belarus, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Morocco, Uzbekistan and Vietnam.

    Netanyahu’s decision was significant because his office had previously said the composition of a Gaza executive committee — which includes Turkey, Israel’s key regional rival, and will work with those governing the territory day to day — was not coordinated with the Israeli government and ran “contrary to its policy,” without clarifying its objections.

    The move could now put Netanyahu in conflict with some of the far-right allies in his coalition, such as Israel’s Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who has criticized the board and called for Israel to take unilateral responsibility for Gaza’s future.

    Many questions remain about the board. When asked by a reporter on Tuesday if the board would replace the U.N., Trump said: “It might.”

    White House names some officials to oversight boards

    The White House said an executive board will work to carry out the vision of the Board of Peace.

    The executive board’s members include U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump envoy Steve Witkoff, Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Apollo Global Management CEO Marc Rowan, World Bank President Ajay Banga, and Trump’s deputy national security adviser Robert Gabriel.

    Rowan is a co-founder Apollo Global Management, a U.S. asset-management firm. The billionaire businessman is also a philanthropist who has supported projects in Israel, the U.S. Jewish community, and the University of Pennsylvania, where he and Trump both studied.

    Nickolay Mladenov, a former Bulgarian politician and U.N. Mideast envoy, is to serve as the executive board’s representative overseeing day-to-day matters.