Tag: topic-link-auto

  • House of the week: An end-unit townhouse in Elkins Park for $499,000

    House of the week: An end-unit townhouse in Elkins Park for $499,000

    She has been staying there only for a few months, but Samantha Robinson knows why her grandparents loved their Elkins Park end-unit townhouse and the neighborhood.

    “Everybody says hello,” she said. “Everybody looks out for each other.”

    Her mother, Kerry Rosenthal, said her dad “really liked the wall space and the lighting. Being an end unit made it easier for my mom to grow things.”

    Rosenthal said it’s possible to walk through the neighborhood and think you’re in a rural area until you hear the commuter rail train nearby .

    Her parents — Beverly Green, a writing teacher, and Stephen Green, an attorney — bought the condo in the gated Breyer Woods development in 2011, expecting to renovate it so they could age in place. The Greens died in October.

    The back porch with a permanent gas grill.

    The 2,936-square-foot house, built in 1993, has three bedrooms, two full bathrooms, and two half bathrooms.

    The main level has a living room with a working gas fireplace, a deck, and a dedicated home office that could serve as a fourth bedroom.

    A two-car attached garage leads directly to the laundry room.

    The living room has a working gas fireplace.

    The upper level primary suite has vaulted ceilings and multiple closets.

    The finished walk-out basement has a half bath and kitchenette and opens to a second private deck.

    Community residents have access to a tennis court and can join the adjacent student center at the Elkins Park campus of Drexel University, which has a clubhouse and gym.

    The kitchen.

    The house is a short walk from the Jenkintown SEPTA station, and a supermarket is less than a half-mile away.

    The house is listed by Frank Blumenthal at Keller Williams Real Estate Tri-County for $499,000.

  • An analysis of the Union’s roster at the start of the season, with new players in the mix

    An analysis of the Union’s roster at the start of the season, with new players in the mix

    As we do every year to start a Union season, here’s a player-by-player look at the team’s roster.

    The list at each position is in order of what looks to be the depth chart heading into the campaign, which starts Wednesday in the Concacaf Champions Cup at Defence Force FC of Trinidad & Tobago (6 p.m., FS2, TUDN). The regular-season opener follows on Saturday at D.C. United (7:30 p.m., Apple TV).

    Goalkeeper

    Andre Blake

    This analysis has been going since 2018, and the same name has gone first every time. It will stay first for as long as Blake remains, not just as the Union’s No. 1, but as the best goalkeeper in MLS for a decade.

    Andre Blake has won MLS’s goalkeeper of the year award three times.
    Andrew Rick

    He showed again last year that he’s a safe pair of hands as the backup, and he’s still only 20 years old. The question will be if he’s willing to wait longer than Matt Freese did — understandably — to get more playing time. If he is, his time will come, but Blake isn’t going anywhere yet.

    Andrew Rick making a save during a U.S. Open Cup game last year.
    George Marks

    A short-term contract last year earned him a longer deal to be the No. 3 in net.

    George Marks in action for the Union’s reserve team last year.

    Left back

    A player who hasn’t been signed yet

    There’s no other way to put it right now. The Union are shopping for a new starter, and are close to sealing a deal for that player to be 20-year-old Philippe Ndinga from Swedish club Degerfors. But as Yogi Berra might say if he was a soccer fan, it’s not official until it’s official.

    Jon Scheer, the Union’s head of academy and professional development, has been the face of the front office this winter with Ernst Tanner on leave.

    Frankie Westfield

    Until Ndinga settles in, Westfield is likely to do the job. The rise of the Northeast Philadelphia native last year was one of the season’s great stories.

    Frankie Westfield was one of the Union’s breakout players last year.

    Right back

    Nathan Harriel

    He has definitely earned the starting job, even though his attacking contributions are still limited. Once Ndinga gets going, Harriel might start platooning with Westfield to play in certain matchups.

    Nathan Harriel played 31 games last year, often stepping in at centerback when the Union were short there.
    Olivier Mbaizo

    He’s highly regarded in the locker room, especially as part of the unofficial welcoming committee for new players who come from abroad. But that doesn’t guarantee playing time, and it’s tough to tell how much he’ll get this year.

    Olivier Mbaizo is going into his ninth season with the Union’s first team.

    Centerback

    Olwethu Makhanya

    He hadn’t played a second for the first team at the start of last year, but Bradley Carnell trusted his fellow South African to step up. Now the 20-year-old is a stalwart, and importantly the only returning player in the centerback group. That, perhaps, makes his role even bigger.

    Olwethu Makhanya was one of last year’s most impressive players.
    Japhet Sery Larsen

    The Union don’t often sign experienced players from abroad, preferring to find underrated names they can develop and sell. But they knew they needed a veteran to replace Jakob Glesnes, and the 25-year-old Denmark native fits the bill. Now, can he handle the physicality of MLS?

    Japhet Sery Larsen is expected to have a big role on the Union’s back line this year.
    Geiner Martínez

    We haven’t seen much of the 23-year-old Colombian yet, but it’s a safe bet that we will in time. The Union have a busy schedule with the Concacaf Champions Cup, Leagues Cup, and compressed stretches of the regular season around the World Cup. Rotating centerbacks will be as important as ever.

    Geiner Martinez during one of the Union’s preseason games.
    Finn Sundstrom

    A 19-year-old prospect who grew up with North Carolina FC of the second-tier USL Championship, Sundstrom is a name for the future, and likely will spend more time with the Union’s reserves than the first team this year.

    Finn Sundstrom working out during a preseason practice.
    Neil Pierre

    The best centerback prospect in the Union’s academy pipeline is on loan to Denmark’s Lyngby, where the Union own a stake, through June. Hopefully he will be closer to ready for first-team minutes when he returns.

    Neil Pierre (right) made his Union first-team debut last year.

    Defensive midfielders

    Jovan Lukić

    Perhaps the best of last year’s signings, Lukić jumped effortlessly into the midfield engine room. His tackles and his talking can be a little too robust sometimes, but the total package has been great.

    Jovan Lukić getting stuck during a game last summer.
    Danley Jean Jacques

    A great partner to Lukić, Jean Jacques is now set for a true star turn with Haiti at the World Cup. It can’t be said enough how special it will be if he plays in Philadelphia against Brazil this summer.

    Danley Jean Jacques also had a strong season in the Union’s midfield last year.
    Alejandro Bedoya

    The longtime captain is in his 11th season in Chester, and third in a series of one-year contracts. The mental side of his game is as sharp as ever, but the clock is inevitably running on a body that will turn 39 in April.

    Alejandro Bedoya models the Union’s new jersey this year.
    Jesús Bueno

    He probably deserves better than the playing time he gets. Carnell has hinted at it, too. Will this be the year it happens?

    Jesús Bueno in action last year.

    Attacking midfielder

    Milan Iloski

    His arrival in August was the turning point in the Union’s season. They likely would not have won the Supporters’ Shield without him. Carnell likes playing Iloski at forward sometimes, but the team as a whole is clearly better when he’s in midfield. That forces opposing defenses to open up.

    Indiana Vassilev

    Early on in his time in Chester, it looked like most of his contributions would come from industrious pressing. But over the course of last season, he blossomed into more, and finished last year with seven goals and four assists.

    Indiana Vassilev (center) celebrates scoring a goal for the Union in August.
    Quinn Sullivan

    When he returns from a torn ACL in July, after the World Cup break, it will give the team a huge boost. He’s been greatly missed on the field, although he’s fortunately been able to stay a vibrant presence off it.

    The Union greatly missed Quinn Sullivan (left) after his ACL injury in September, especially during the playoffs.
    Cavan Sullivan

    With two years to go until he leaves for Manchester City, the now-16-year-old is running out of time to make an impact on his hometown club. Or perhaps it’s better to say the club is running out of time for him to impact it. Will this be the year he breaks out?

    Lots of people around the soccer world are waiting for Cavan Sullivan to truly break out on the field.
    Jeremy Rafanello

    The Delran native has become the unofficial closer for Union wins, but he isn’t likely to overtake the players ahead of him here. It also bears saying that time given to him is time that Cavan Sullivan could get instead.

    Jeremy Rafanello (center) on the ball against Inter Miami last year.
    Ben Bender

    Carnell likes his willingness to sacrifice, which has led to testing the 24-year-old as an emergency left back. That doesn’t look likely to stand for the long term, but at least he has the manager’s respect.

    Ben Bender (right) has earned Bradley Carnell’s appreciation.
    CJ Olney

    He was a marquee prospect a few years ago, and is still just 19. But he has plateaued since signing a first-team contract in 2024.

    CJ Olney in action with Union II last year.

    Forward

    Bruno Damiani

    It was easy to see his strengths in his first season here: size, speed, physicality. But in the stats that mattered most, he tallied only nine goals and one assist in 40 games. That has to change this year, especially with Tai Baribo and Mikael Uhre gone.

    Ezekiel Alladoh

    You can tell just from practices why the Union broke their transfer fee record to sign the 20-year-old Ghana native. He’s still raw, though, and Carnell has preached patience. Alas, only so much will be given if he doesn’t find the net.

    The Union paid a team record $4.5 million to sign Ezekiel Alladoh.
    Agustín Anello

    He’s an intriguing signing: born in Florida to Argentine parents, raised in Spain, and a pro career in four countries by age 23. Even better, he played with Harriel and Damiani at some of his stops along the way. He projects as the No. 3 striker right now but should still see significant playing time.

    Agustín Anello (left) is settling in with the Union after arriving late in preseason.
    Stas Korzeniowski

    A promotion to the first team was a nice reward for the former Penn star’s 12 goals for Union II last year.

    Sal Olivas

    He showed promise in his brief shots with the first team last year. A few more shots this year would be a welcome sight.

    Sal Olivas (left) got a brief run with the Union’s first team last summer.
    Eddy Davis

    Definitely still a prospect, but his work rate and enthusiasm make him easy to root for.

    Markus Anderson

    He is reportedly going out on loan this year.

  • From East Berlin to Philadelphia: Springsteen’s long arc of protest

    From East Berlin to Philadelphia: Springsteen’s long arc of protest

    Philadelphia has always understood that music is never just music; sometimes rhythm becomes resistance. In this city, songs have spilled out of union halls and church basements, echoed off rowhouse walls, and marched alongside movements for labor rights and racial justice.

    That tradition shows why Bruce Springsteen’s music, and his choices, still matter, decades after a summer night in East Berlin when rock and roll quietly challenged both sides of a superpower rivalry.

    In 1988, nearly 300,000 young East Germans gathered for the largest rock concert in the history of the German Democratic Republic. The performer was Springsteen, a working-class songwriter whose music had already been widely misunderstood in the United States.

    Ronald Reagan appropriated the pounding chorus of “Born in the U.S.A.” as a patriotic anthem while ignoring its verses — the story of a Vietnam veteran sent off “to go and kill the yellow man,” only to return home abandoned by the country he served.

    In East Germany, those lyrics landed differently. Listeners heard the betrayal beneath the beat. They recognized themselves in the song’s moral tension. That understanding is why, unlike most Western rock stars, Springsteen was invited to play behind the Iron Curtain.

    Pressure to stop the concert came from both sides of the Cold War. The U.S. Embassy urged Springsteen to cancel, fearing the show would legitimize a communist regime. At the same time, the East German youth organization sponsoring the concert — without Springsteen’s knowledge — advertised it as a “solidarity concert” for Nicaragua’s Sandinista government.

    Springsteen refused both. He told U.S. officials he would not cancel. He told East German organizers he would not perform unless Sandinista banners were removed. His music, he insisted, belonged to ordinary working people, not to politicians.

    About an hour into the concert, Springsteen stopped and addressed the crowd in halting German. “It’s great to be in East Berlin,” he said. “I’m not here for or against any government. I came to play rock and roll for East Berliners in the hope that, one day, all barriers will be torn down.”

    He had wanted to say “walls,” but anxious officials begged him to soften the language. So he let the music finish the thought, launching into Bob Dylan’s “Chimes of Freedom,” a song written for the refugees, the silenced, the imprisoned, which Springsteen has lately reprised. A year later, the Berlin Wall fell. Many described the night as a widening crack — a moment when imagination briefly outran fear.

    Late last month, Springsteen’s new song “The Streets of Minneapolis” reached No. 1 on iTunes in 19 countries. Written in response to police violence and racial injustice, the song was dismissed last week by the White House as “irrelevant.” Millions of listeners disagreed.

    People protest against ICE outside the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building on Jan. 30 in Minneapolis.

    This pattern is familiar. Springsteen’s work has long been embraced by audiences while misread, or deliberately misunderstood, by power. His songs are moral arguments set to melody, like the Academy Award-winning tune “Streets of Philadelphia.” They insist the American dream is fragile. It collapses when dignity, accountability, and justice are denied.

    That message resonates deeply in Philadelphia, a city shaped by labor battles, civil rights struggles, and ongoing demands for racial justice. It also resonates with the white working-class men who have always been at the center of Springsteen’s audience — many of whom now make up the backbone of the MAGA movement.

    His message to them has never changed. Freedom does not come from walls. Power does not come from cruelty. The streets belong to everyone, or they belong to no one. Will this be the moment when they hear Donald Trump’s administration is destroying whatever is left of the American dream?

    Music alone does not tear down barriers — or walls. But it shapes what people are willing to imagine, what they are willing to demand, and who they are willing to stand beside.

    Springsteen’s music calls us to rise up against injustice, whether in the streets of Philadelphia, Berlin, or Minneapolis.

    Kristen Ghodsee is a professor of Russian and East European studies at the University of Pennsylvania. She is the author of 12 books and is currently on academic sabbatical as an honorary fellow of the Einstein Forum in Potsdam, Germany. Susan Neiman has been the director of the Einstein Forum since 2000. She is a philosopher, essayist, and the author of 10 books.

  • Letters to the Editor | Feb. 17, 2026

    Letters to the Editor | Feb. 17, 2026

    A criminal justice overhaul

    The Thursday print edition of The Inquirer provided several reasons why we should applaud the current presidential administration for its contributions to criminal justice reform. For example, unlike many liberal state and local politicians who have talked the talk about providing employment opportunities for former criminals, Associated Press writer Ryan J. Foley reported that enlightened managers from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement have hired these individuals while they were still exhibiting criminal behavior. It should be mentioned that ICE has found creative ways for these individuals to sublimate their violent temperaments and offensive libidos into constructive law enforcement activities that have made cities like New York, Minneapolis, and Chicago so much safer.

    In that same edition of The Inquirer, Washington Post reporters described how the U.S. Department of Justice has successfully kept the names of sexual predators in the Jeffrey Epstein files out of the public eye. In an era in which progressives have rallied to “ban the box” that would otherwise require job applicants to describe their criminal history, the Justice Department has gone one step further in assuring Epstein criminals will not be economically penalized.

    It is refreshing to see that just like Lady Justice, the U.S. Departments of Homeland Security and Justice have undertaken their duties as if they were blindfolded.

    Coleman Poses, Philadelphia

    A cancer within?

    Recent reports that President Donald Trump is threatening to cancel elections and bypass Congress with an executive order on election reforms brought to mind another presidential power grab.

    In 1973, White House counsel John Dean famously warned President Richard Nixon that the Watergate cover-up was a “cancer within — close to the presidency.” He cautioned that this corruption would consume Nixon’s presidency if allowed to fester. History proved him right, as Nixon resigned in disgrace.

    Today, that warning rings with renewed urgency. By appointing Kurt Olsen as director of election security and Heather Honey as deputy assistant secretary for election integrity — both known election deniers — Trump has institutionalized systemic subversion. With his intent to nationalize elections on the heels of these appointments, the administration is poised to seize state-run processes, despite having no constitutional authority to do so.

    Had it not been for the stabilizing counsel from the president’s first-term advisers, who have since been replaced with yes-men and ideologues, the republic may not have survived. With these guardians of democracy gone, the American Experiment is in grave jeopardy.

    Jane Larkin, Tampa, Fla.

    Wrong-headed ‘housing’

    I read the article about plans by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to spend $38.3 billion on detention centers with revulsion.

    Donald Trump’s administration spends a fortune of our tax dollars to create concentration camps across the country. The cruelty is mind-boggling.

    Meanwhile, we have a housing crisis throughout the nation. Imagine if those funds were diverted from tormenting our immigrant neighbors and devoted to providing affordable housing for our communities.

    Judith Silver, Philadelphia

    . . .

    ICE is going to spend over $38 billion on detention centers. This country has so many needs — medical costs skyrocketing, a housing shortage, people mired in poverty, disaster relief, drunk drivers who kill 10,000 people per year (far more than ever have been killed by foreign nationals in the last half century), and the list goes on and on — and yet, the Trump administration believes this is a good use of our tax dollars. This surge to “mass deportation” is just another solution in search of a problem.

    Steven Morley, Philadelphia

    Join the conversation: Send letters to letters@inquirer.com. Limit length to 150 words and include home address and day and evening phone number. Letters run in The Inquirer six days a week on the editorial pages and online.

  • Dear Abby | Spouse’s world turned upside down by pair of revelations

    DEAR ABBY: My husband and I (both male) have been together for 28 years. The last few years have been less than romantic, but we remain close and in love (or so I thought).

    A few days ago, he called me from work (I’m retired) crying so hard I could hardly understand him. I rushed to his office, and he told me he had just learned from his doctor that he has AIDS. He then confessed that he’d had an affair with a contractor at his place of employment. He said it happened years ago when we were going through a rough patch, and swore it was the only time he had strayed. I am awaiting the results of my HIV test, heartbroken and crushed. What now? I’m so hurt; I don’t know if I should stay or go.

    — CRUSHED IN FLORIDA

    DEAR CRUSHED: Your first order of business should be to ensure you and your husband are getting the best medical advice and treatment possible. A diagnosis of HIV-positive does not necessarily mean the disease will progress to full-blown AIDS because with the advances in medication, it can be held in check. Whether you should stay with your husband or leave is a question that should be tabled until you are less traumatized and thinking rationally.

    ** ** **

    DEAR ABBY: Two of my children are planning weddings two months apart next year. I’m originally from the Netherlands, where my entire family still lives. My kids both want to invite these relatives (which is great), except my parents are 86 and 87 and can make it to only one wedding. For my sisters, nieces and nephews, it’s too costly to come to both. They don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings, and I have no idea how to advise them about which wedding to attend. My son said he will help them financially if they need it so they can come to both, but even so, I know it would not be possible for my parents to come to both. Any advice?

    — CHALLENGED IN IDAHO

    DEAR CHALLENGED: I do have one suggestion: STEP BACK! It should not be your responsibility to orchestrate who will attend which wedding. Invitations should be sent to everyone. After that, I’m sure conversations will ensue. If financial help is needed, your son is offering it. Should your parents’ degree of infirmity prevent them from attending both celebrations, the decision about which they will attend should be theirs. Even if they can’t be there in person for both, these days many weddings are livestreamed, and photos and videos can be shared on social media.

    ** ** **

    TO MY ASIAN READERS WHO CELEBRATE THE LUNAR NEW YEAR: The Lunar New Year begins today. This is the Year of the Horse. According to Asian culture, individuals born in the year of the horse are dynamic, charming and adventurous. They thrive in settings that are bustling with activity and are often seen as natural leaders and motivators. A healthy, happy and prosperous New Year to you all. Tallyho!

    — LOVE, ABBY

    ** ** **

  • Horoscopes: Tuesday, Feb. 17, 2026

    ARIES (March 21-April 19). Noticing the gap between who you are and who you want to be? That’s a win. Accepting it without shame is the kind of mindset that makes real progress possible. It takes humility to grow, and humility like that will get you far.

    TAURUS (April 20-May 20). With billions of people on the planet, it’s only natural that some paths will cross in messy ways. Conflicts happen. Challenges are unavoidable. And that’s a good thing, especially today because they keep the adventure fun and the story interesting.

    GEMINI (May 21-June 21). Things that are always around get ignored. Things you can never have feel frustrating. The things that keep you wanting more? They show up sometimes, not all the time. That’s the sweet spot. The desire you chase or are chased by will illustrate the concept.

    CANCER (June 22-July 22). After an extended cycle of accommodating others, your own needs are a whisper. At this juncture, it would be normal not to know what you want. It would also be normal to turn the trend around.

    LEO (July 23-Aug. 22). Endless choice can feel like no choice at all because too many options make it hard to know what you like. Everything starts to feel the same. You’ll figure out what you like by choosing and sticking with something.

    VIRGO (Aug. 23-Sept. 22). The day’s dance is a kick line — a cumulative effect, beautiful in its conformity, requiring peripheral awareness. The line becomes one creature with many legs hitting the same rhythm and height. Dancers who can kick higher save it for another dance.

    LIBRA (Sept. 23-Oct. 23). You feel compelled to make a move even though you can’t imagine the outcome just yet. Inability to picture a future doesn’t mean the move is wrong. Right now, your instincts are simply ahead of your perception and imagination.

    SCORPIO (Oct. 24-Nov. 21). Can you be overeducated? Only if all that knowledge keeps you from doing anything. Not everything you learn is immediately useful. By taking action, you’ll learn which part of your education applies, and from there, experience will be your new professor.

    SAGITTARIUS (Nov. 22-Dec. 21). Take your time with today’s decisions, especially financial ones. Note that expensive things aren’t automatically better things, and sometimes they are worse, offered by the greedy to the ignorant, which is why you’ll do the research.

    CAPRICORN (Dec. 22-Jan. 19). Difficulty isn’t just the price of admission. It’s the weight that makes the muscle. Hard things aren’t the dues you pay to be awesome; they are why you’re awesome. The work required to earn them is what makes them transformative rather than hollow.

    AQUARIUS (Jan. 20-Feb. 18). Oddly enough, putting too much thought into a thing can make it less effective. The slapdash version will contain the most honest information, whether you’re on the giving or receiving end of it.

    PISCES (Feb. 19-March 20). Feeling stuck? There are options you’re not using — things you could say, decisions you could make, buttons to push, experiments just waiting for the scientist in you to try. Play a few of those hands and then see how you feel. You’re more powerful than you know.

    TODAY’S BIRTHDAY (Feb. 17). Welcome to your Year of the Bonsai Tree, when you grow in the direction you train in and create circumstances that bring about your most elegant form. Purposeful personal development will include making your own rules, helpful reinforcements and nurturing that has you continually warmed by emotional sunshine. More highlights: Romantic clarity, financial advantage, and spiritual insight that illuminates even your business decisions. Pisces and Capricorn adore you. Your lucky numbers are: 10, 26, 5, 37 and 15.

  • Frederick Wiseman, documentarian behind the Northeast High-filmed ‘High School,’ dies at 96

    Frederick Wiseman, documentarian behind the Northeast High-filmed ‘High School,’ dies at 96

    Frederick Wiseman, 96, the renowned documentarian who chronicled life at Northeast Philadelphia High School in a 1968 film that caused a yearslong controversy in the city, has died.

    Zipporah Films, a company that has distributed Mr. Wiseman’s films for more than 50 years, confirmed the filmmaker’s death in a statement Monday.

    Known for his direct cinema style, Mr. Wiseman started his career as a law professor at the Boston University Institute of Law and Medicine before turning to film. His lengthy filmography stretches back to 1967 with the release of Titicut Follies, a controversial exposé focused on the treatment of the patient-inmates of Bridgewater State Hospital for the Criminally Insane in Massachusetts.

    That film was banned in Massachusetts for more than two decades.

    His follow-up, 1968’s High School, a foundational cinema verite documentary filmed at Northeast High School in Philly between the assassinations of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, was similarly controversial. In fact, Northeast High leaders found it so incendiary that it did not receive a local premiere until 2001 — 32 years after its initial release — for Mr. Wiseman’s fear of legal action.

    At 75 minutes, High School depicted what viewers at the time saw as a bleak vision of life at Northeast High. Contemporary reviews agreed, with Variety writing that it showed the school taught “little but the dreary values of conformity, [and] blind respect for authority.” Newsweek noted that the film showed “high schools are prisons where the old beat down the young.”

    In one scene, a guidance counselor tells a student they may not be college material. In another, a teacher tells a girl her legs are too fat for a dress she sewed. Another shows a dean shutting down a student who was complaining about unfairly receiving detention.

    As early as mid-1969, Mr. Wiseman refused to make a copy of the film available locally, citing “legal repercussions,” according to Inquirer reports from the time. The Philadelphia Board of Education, meanwhile, declared the documentary “biased” and demanded it be shown to students and faculty.

    High School, however, would not receive its first official local public showing until August 2001, at the Prince Music Theater. About 400 people attended, The Inquirer reported, most of whom were faculty or alumni of Northeast High.

    Five days later, it aired on the PBS series POV Classic.

    “I took him to the annual press tour the year we aired High School and never had a funnier, more incisive companion to compare notes with on the state of cinema,” said Cara Mertes, who was then the executive producer of POV Classic. “He was perpetually young, incredibly smart, and did not suffer fools, and still he was always generous with his time and immense talent as one of America’s greatest chroniclers, in any medium.”

    Ten years before, in 1991, High School was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress.

    “It is everything you need to know about 1968 middle-class America in microcosm,” Mertes said. “So many scenes and characters have taken on iconic status. It captures the tectonic social shifts happening in the most ordinary of exchanges in the day-to-day of a touchstone of American life: the high school experience.”

    “Wiseman pulled a fast one on Northeast,” said English department head Irene Reiter after seeing the film. “It was a setup to attack the educational system.”

    Former students, however, largely seemed to disagree. Andrea Korman Shapiro, a student featured in a scene in which a vice principal admonishes her for wearing a minidress to prom, called it “accurate.”

    “[It’s] a chronicle of the inner life of people not permitted to speak,” she said.

    Even others who had more positive experiences at the school argued the film’s strengths outweighed its shortcomings. As Marilyn Kleinberg, a 1978 graduate, put it: “It felt real to me, even though I had an excellent experience.”

    Shapiro, meanwhile, said it would be wise to view High School as a “trauma model.”

    “A trauma, if it doesn’t get resolved, gets replayed and reenacted,” she said. “There needs to be some kind of learning to let it go.”

    The year High School debuted in Philadelphia, Mr. Wiseman told Current, a nonprofit news organization associated with American University’s School of Communication, that his concerns about legal action over the film were perhaps overblown.

    “This was soon after the Titicut Follies case, and I didn’t want another lawsuit on my hands,” he said. Possible legal threats, he added, were merely the “vague talk of no one particular individual.”

    In 2016, Mr. Wiseman received an honorary Oscar at the 89th Academy Awards for his “masterful and distinctive documentaries” that “examine the familiar and reveal the unexpected.” Making films, he said in his acceptance speech, presented opportunities to “learn something about a new subject.”

    “The variety and complexity of the human behavior observed in making one of the films, and cumulatively all of the films, is staggering,” Mr. Wiseman said in the speech. “And I think it is as important to document kindness, civility, and generosity of spirit as it is to show cruelty, banality, and indifference.”

    The article has been updated with quotes from Cara Mertes.

  • Source: Jabari Walker, Sixers agree to a two-year standard deal

    Source: Jabari Walker, Sixers agree to a two-year standard deal

    Jabari Walker and the 76ers have agreed to a two-year standard contract, a league source confirmed to The Inquirer Monday night.

    The standard deal comes after Walker, a 6-foot-7 forward, exhausted his 50 active NBA games allowed while on a two-way contract. As a result, Walker was unable to play in the Sixers’ last four games before the All-Star break.

    Before then, Walker had been in the Sixers’ rotation for the bulk of the season. He is averaging 3.7 points and 3.1 rebounds in 12.1 minutes across 45 games and has been praised for his high-energy playing style.

    Walker’s contract conversion comes on the heels of the Sixers agreeing to a rest-of-season deal with veteran guard Cameron Payne, who spent part of the 2023-24 season in Philly and had been playing in Serbia. The moves help shore up the Sixers’ roster following the trade deadline, when they dealt away 2024 first-round draft pick Jared McCain and veteran guard Eric Gordon. The prorated deals will also keep the Sixers under the luxury tax threshold.

    The Sixers also converted starting forward Dominick Barlow’s two-way contract to a standard deal on Feb. 5. Dalen Terry and MarJon Beauchamp currently hold the Sixers’ other two-way slots.

    Once Walker’s contract is converted, the Sixers intend to sign forward Tyrese Martin to the vacated two-way roster slot.

    Martin, a 26-year-old Allentown native, last played for the Brooklyn Nets before being released to free up a roster spot at the trade deadline. The 6-6 Martin has averaged 7.2 points, three rebounds, and 1.7 assists in 113 career NBA games across three seasons.

  • Eagles WR DeVonta Smith’s celebrity softball game will return to Allentown in May

    Eagles WR DeVonta Smith’s celebrity softball game will return to Allentown in May

    Eagles wide receiver DeVonta Smith will host his fifth celebrity softball game in Allentown on May 2, the Lehigh Valley IronPigs announced Monday. The event will take place at Coca-Cola Park, the IronPigs’ home stadium.

    Smith had another successful campaign for the Eagles, recording 1,008 receiving yards and four touchdowns on 77 receptions. It was the third time Smith has topped 1,000 yards in a season.

    The softball game will feature some of Smith’s teammates, friends, and other NFL players. A home run derby will take place at 1:30 p.m. followed by the softball game at 3 p.m.

    Darius Slay (left) and A.J. Brown at DeVonta Smith’s celebrity softball game in 2024.

    Smith’s game has provided fireworks for fans in the past. Running back Saquon Barkley, defensive end Brandon Graham, tight end Dallas Goedert, and cornerbacks Darius Slay and Cooper DeJean participated last year, along with former Eagles wide receiver Terrell Owens. DeJean earned last year’s game MVP.

    Packers edge rusher Micah Parsons built his own team in 2022 to face Smith’s team. That year, Smith had wide receiver A.J. Brown on his team. Brown beat Parsons in the home run derby, then hit the walk-off home run to beat Team Parsons, which featured Miami Dolphins wide receiver Jaylen Waddle and former Eagles running back Boston Scott.

    Participants for this year’s game will be announced at a later date.

  • E&S players left the bench to protect their teammates. Now their season is over.

    E&S players left the bench to protect their teammates. Now their season is over.

    The boys’ basketball players from Carver Engineering & Sciences who left the bench last week came onto the court after fans from Constitution’s stands rushed the court and surrounded their teammates, according to a report by one of the game’s officials that was submitted to the School District of Philadelphia.

    The referee said the altercation in Thursday’s Public League playoff game was started by a player from Constitution, who the ref said pushed the E&S player as the E&S player walked away.

    “Then I saw a crowd of people from the [Constitution] spectator area of the bleachers running towards those two players,” the referee wrote. “So, I gradually backed off because I didn’t know what was coming next.”

    What came next was the reserves from E&S leaving the bench. They “eased onto the court,” the ref said. And that was enough for E&S to be suspended from the league playoffs.

    The Engineers were ahead by 12 points with 1 minute, 11 seconds left when an altercation started by an opposing player was inflamed by opposing fans. And now that opposing team is taking E&S’ place on Tuesday against Imhotep Charter in the Public League semifinals at La Salle University.

    Representatives from E&S met Sunday night on Zoom with Jimmy Lynch, the Public League president. Lynch told them the ruling stood. League rules say that a team must forfeit once their “entire bench” enters the field of play.

    The PIAA told E&S that the decision stood with the school district. A school district spokeswoman said Monday that the decision would not be changed. Lynch could not be reached for comment.

    The representatives from E&S did not argue that their players left the bench but they were hoping that the rule could be applied with the context of the situation: the players came onto the court to protect their teammates once their teammates were surrounded by spectators. The E&S players did not throw a punch or look to fight, the parents said.

    “If our students engaged in the on-court incident we would’ve had penalties and suspensions,” said Miya Brown, a mother of an E&S player. “But because we avoided the confrontation, we have been disqualified from continuing on. All of this is so disgusting. It really is. The mission is supposed to be about student safety but they’re ignoring the safety part of this incident.”

    “If this brawl happened at the opposing team’s end of the bench and our student athletes ran to the other end of the bench, I could understand. If this happened on center court and our student athletes left the bench, I could understand. But this happened in front of our bench and the crowd is running toward our student athletes. There is no way you can make a just decision based on those facts. It got out of control.”

    E&S did not practice Monday but remained hopeful that something would change before tipoff of Tuesday’s semifinal. That seems unlikely.

    The Carver Engineering and Science boys’ basketball team after winning a tournament earlier this season.

    The Engineers were 20-4 this season before the forfeit became their fifth loss. They won a tournament in Northeastern Pa. and took Imhotep — the defending league champions — to overtime in January before losing. They wanted another shot.

    “That’s the matchup everyone wants to see,” said Dave McField, a father of an E&S player.

    The referee said he asked during the first quarter for security guards to be placed near the Constitution fans because “they were being unruly.” At halftime, he told E&S’ athletic director that he needed more security. He said a security guard stopped the game in the third quarter to warn the fans but the guard did not stay in the area.

    “So when everything jumped off,” he wrote. “Those same unruly fans rushed the court.”

    The referee said he planned to eject the Constitution player from the game “because he started this chain of events” and “was the only player I saw push or hit any opponent.” The referee stood in the corner of the court as fans overtook the floor. E&S was 71 seconds left from reaching their first league semifinals in 20 years. Instead, their season was about to end.

    “I glanced at the [Constitution] bench area where I saw the head coach next to about five of his bench players,” the ref wrote. “At that time, I called the game and walked off.”