Tag: topic-link-auto

  • A.J. Brown was right. The Eagles offense is still a bleep show. They need to fix it soon.

    A.J. Brown was right. The Eagles offense is still a bleep show. They need to fix it soon.

    A.J. Brown was wrong about one thing.

    The Eagles offense isn’t a bleep show.

    It isn’t any kind of show at all.

    At this point, it’s just plain ol’ bleep.

    If that sounds harsh, well, harsh is a pretty good word to describe the experience of watching the Eagles offense right now. The play-calling lacks imagination. The run-blocking lacks the dominance that was once its hallmark. The quarterback has always lacked aggression. Now, he lacks accuracy, too.

    That’s not an ideal formula. There are all kinds of ways you can shrug off the staggering ineptitude the Eagles displayed while muddling their way to a 16-9 win over the Detroit Lions on Sunday night. It’s an easy thing to do when your defense consistently forces opponents to play bleepier than you. The Eagles are 8-2, with the best Super Bowl odds in the NFC, and victories over four of the five teams whose odds are just behind theirs. That stuff matters. But you can’t shrug off the one question that every team with Super Bowl aspirations must constantly ask itself.

    Are we a championship team in our current form?

    That the Eagles can even think about answering yes is a testament to how good they are everywhere outside of offensive execution.

    Brown said it best on Sunday night.

    “This team is resilient,” said the Eagles’ wide receiver, who broke free of his recent on-field anonymity with 11 targets and seven catches, albeit for only 49 yards. “Show up, work hard, find a way, no matter what it looks like.”

    Brown is right. And he has been right all along. The Eagles are a very good team. Winning football games is important. But so is progress. Right now, the Eagles are a long way off from being the best team they can be.

    Nothing that we saw from them on Sunday night suggests their fundamental problem has been solved. It isn’t just that the Eagles aren’t scoring enough points. It’s that they don’t appear to be getting any better.

    They have scored 17 or fewer in four of their last six games, including a combined 26 in their last two. Are they capable of winning a Super Bowl in their current form? Absolutely. But you can’t ignore how different their current form is from the one that saw them win the Super Bowl last season.

    For the second straight game, and for the fifth time this season, the Eagles failed to crack 300 yards of total offense. That only happened three times all last season. Heck, it only happened five times in 2023.

    There are plenty of mitigating circumstances. Last week’s game in Green Bay was played in real feel temperatures that dropped into the teens. Sunday’s win over the Lions featured a steady wind with wild gusts above 30 miles per hour. In both games, the Eagles lost All-Pro right tackle Lane Johnson to an injury (most recently, his foot, which sidelined him for all of the second half Sunday night).

    Coordinator Kevin Patullo is among those seeking answers to the team’s offensive issues.

    The schedule has been brutal. The Lions defense entered Sunday ranked seventh in the NFL in yards per play allowed. The Eagles had already faced three of the six teams who ranked above Detroit (Denver Broncos, Green Bay Packers, Los Angeles Rams).

    “We want to be better than what we were tonight, but every game’s played a little bit differently,” coach Nick Sirianni said. “Every game is played to win, but do we have to clean up things on offense? Of course we do. As good as the defense played, we’re going to have to clean up things on defense. As good as the special teams played, we’re going to have to clean up things on special teams. But on offense, there’s some shooting ourselves in the foot that’s happening and some of those things are things that, we always talk about [things that] take no talent, and we have such good talent that we have to be able to master the things that take no talent so our talent can shine.”

    Give them credit for trying something new. They tried to force the ball to Brown, which is something that he and plenty of Eagles fans have been lobbying for in recent weeks. His 11 targets were more than he had in the last two games combined, including last week’s three-target, two-catch nothingburger in Green Bay.

    The concerning thing is that nothing else changed. Brown’s seven catches went for just 49 yards. The Eagles scored just one touchdown. Even on a night when Jared Goff was out of sync and the Lions went 0-for-5 on fourth down, Detroit’s offense looked like the more highly evolved unit. The pinnacle came in the second quarter, when Goff hit Amon-Ra St. Brown for 34 yards and then Jameson Williams for a 40-yard touchdown. The 74 yards the Lions gained on two plays were more than the Eagles had gained all game to that point.

    There were plenty of stretches last season when the Eagles looked like that sort of offense. Brown was always at the center of it, it seemed.

    Jalen Hurts and the Eagles offense must find a rhythm if they wish to make a run at another Super Bowl.

    The Eagles need to find a way to make Sunday night a building block. Good things happen when you target even a diminished Brown. The final example came with 1:47 left, with the Eagles one play away from turning the ball back over to the Lions for a chance at a wholly unearned game-tying touchdown drive. On third-and-8 from the Eagles 37, Jalen Hurts forced a pass to a tightly covered Brown, and Lions cornerback Rock Ya-Sin panicked. Instead of watching Hurts’ pass sail wide of its mark and short of the sticks, he reached out toward Brown and drew a flag. It was a questionable call, but the end result gave the Eagles a first down, and kept the Lions offense on the sidelines for the rest of the game.

    “We’re always trying to get A.J. involved,” Sirianni said. “Always, always, always, always. The game play is played differently each and every week of what happens. I don’t think I’ve been shy about saying this. The game plan’s always going to start in the passing game with him and [WR] DeVonta [Smith] and [TE] Dallas [Goedert], and so we’re always trying to do that and get him the football. That’s the way the game played out a little bit today.”

    At some point, it will need to play out better. Let’s hope that point comes soon.

  • Amy Gutmann, once Penn president, is teaching again. Here’s what it’s like to be her student.

    Amy Gutmann, once Penn president, is teaching again. Here’s what it’s like to be her student.

    The undergraduate class at the University of Pennsylvania vigorously discussed the use of affirmative action in college admissions, half the room charged with arguing one side and half the other.

    Their task, informed by the 2023 U.S. Supreme Court decision that ended the use of race-conscious college admissions, was to brief and advise a popular governor of a swing state who had not yet taken a position on the issue.

    “Guess who is the governor?” said their professor, Amy Gutmann. “I am the governor.”

    And for 90 minutes, the entirety of the class period, Gutmann guided a lively discussion in which students talked as much as she did.

    While never a governor, Gutmann has quite the leadership portfolio. She was president of Penn for a record 18 years, leaving in 2022 to become U.S. ambassador to Germany under former President Joe Biden, a post she held until 2024. She is also a Harvard-educated political scientist who cowrote the book The Spirit of Compromise and in 2018 was called one of the world’s 50 greatest leaders by Fortune magazine.

    Now, for the first time in about 25 years — since she was a politics professor at Princeton — Gutmann is back in the classroom teaching a full course this semester in the Annenberg School for Communication. Sarah Banet-Weiser, dean of Annenberg, who initially came up with the idea for the course, is her co-teacher.

    For students, the professorial star power was hard to pass up. There was a waiting list for the class.

    “It’s kind of a power duo,” said Evan Humphrey, 21, a senior communications major from Seattle. “Got to take that class.”

    Senior Evan Humphrey said she was drawn to enroll in the class because of the two professors and their distinguished careers.

    Focusing on teaching — the heart of a university — has been especially meaningful to Gutmann, and to Banet-Weiser, too, at a time when higher education has had its federal funding threatened and its approaches attacked.

    “It literally gives me life every week,” Banet-Weiser said.

    Gutmann, 75, who said she aspired to be a teacher since she was 5, said it has made her feel productive “in a way that goes to the heart of what a university is about.”

    “We should never lose sight of that heart of the university and how valuable it is,” she said.

    The goal of the class, called “The Art and Ethics of Communication in Times of Crisis,” is “to learn how and why to communicate with greater insight and understanding across differences,” while creating space “for free and open dialogue about controversial issues.”

    Seniors Luiza Louback (left) and Sarah Usandivaras (right) participate in the class discussion.

    It could be a primer for the politically divided nation.

    “My pitch is that you can’t really know what you believe if you don’t know what people who disagree with you believe and what their reasons are,” Gutmann said in an interview. “I always say I don’t care what your position is. I care that you can give reasons for it and understand the strongest arguments on the other side.

    “That’s the method to search for truth, and it’s the way we serve a democracy.”

    Bringing experience to the classroom

    During class, Gutmann frequently drew on her experiences as a first-generation college student, a young professor at Princeton, a college president, and an ambassador.

    When she got her first teaching job, a male colleague congratulated her, but later she learned he told someone she got the job because she was a woman.

    “Did I take that as a compliment? Mm-mm,” Gutmann told the class.

    Humphrey said she especially likes hearing about Gutmann’s vast experiences.

    “She’s like, ‘Well, when I was the president here, this is something I dealt with,’” Humphrey said. “It’s really interesting knowing the experience she has and her background and the perspective she brings.”

    Amy Gutmann (center), president emerita of the University of Pennsylvania and former U.S. ambassador to Germany, is presented with the Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History’s Only in America® Award during a gala at the museum this month. The award recognizes “Jewish Americans who have made enormous contributions to our world … often despite facing antisemitism and prejudice.” Among those posing with her are Ramanan Raghavendran (far right), chair of Penn’s board of trustees, veteran journalist Andrea Mitchell (next to Raghavendran), Penn President J. Larry Jameson, (to the immediate left of Gutmann), and David Cohen, former Penn board chair, (next to Jameson.)

    Gutmann’s life outside class continues to be full, too. After class Wednesday, Gutmann, whose father fled Nazi Germany, flew to Berlin to receive the Prize for Understanding and Tolerance from the Jewish Museum Berlin.

    Having returned to Philadelphia to live after leaving Germany, Gutmann said it wasn’t hard to find her stride again in the classroom. She had given one-off lectures as Penn’s president.

    “I have a lot of muscle memory on teaching,” she said.

    Her style has changed from her early days at Princeton, where she worked from 1976 to 2004. She said reading a student’s notebook left behind and open after one of her ethics and public policy lectures was a major turning point.

    “‘That’s not what I said,’” Gutmann thought. “And I realized it’s not what you teach them, it’s what they learn. At that point, I realized I needed feedback.

    “So I changed from doing the 45-minute [lecture] thing to doing five or 10 minutes, max, and then asking them questions. Then I got them to argue with one another, and once I found that, I found what I really discovered worked for learning.”

    Amy Gutmann talks with sophomore Brian Barth (right) at the end of class she co-teaches at Penn’s Annenberg School for Communication.

    Gutmann said she spends Fridays and weekends preparing for the class, which meets twice a week.

    “It’s a ton of work,” she said. “I’m really delighted to be doing it.”

    The class comes against the backdrop of fraught times for colleges. Penn earlier this year scrubbed its website of diversity initiatives after President Donald Trump’s administration threatened funding to schools employing diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. In the summer, the school struck an agreement with the administration over the past participation of former transgender swimmer Lia Thomas, and Penn was one of nine schools originally asked to sign a compact that would have given the school preferential consideration for federal funding in exchange for complying with certain mandates affecting admissions, hiring, and other university operations. Penn declined.

    ‘One-of-a-kind’ discussions

    Gutmann and Banet-Weiser do not allow laptops, phones, or any electronic devices in class so that students completely focus on the conversation. To prepare for the affirmative action discussion, students were assigned related readings and review of the court cases.

    The two professors interacted with each other and prompted discussion among students with deep questions: Is treating people equal the same as treating them equally? Is it right to use affirmative action for only one racial group? What about other forms of affirmative action or preference, including for athletes, low-income students, and legacies whose parents attended the university?

    The approach resonated with students.

    “I wanted to take a class where I would really be encouraged to step out of my comfort zone and be able to learn not only how to understand my own beliefs and values but understand the beliefs and values of others,” said Sarah Usandivaras, 21, a senior communications and political science major who was born in New York and grew up in Paraguay.

    She found it in Gutmann and Banet-Weiser’s classroom.

    “It’s a one-of-a-kind,” she said.

    Ariana Zetlin, a doctoral student in Penn’s Graduate School of Education, is auditing the class to observe its approach.

    “The discussion and the debates are so much deeper and stronger than what I’m seeing in classrooms that don’t necessarily have these structures,” said Zetlin, 30, who is from New York.

    During class, those on both sides found common ground.

    Senior Angele Diamacoune said she was learning from the day’s lesson.

    “So I’m hearing agreement that diversity is a good thing but disagreement on how you get it,” Gutmann said.

    She asked students how many believed that having low-income and racially diverse students in class contributed to their learning. Every hand went up.

    “That to me is really striking,” Gutmann said. “There aren’t that many things that we can get unanimity on.”

    She asked students how they would advise colleges to teach the issue.

    “It would be good to teach with activities like this,” said Angele Diamacoune, 21, a senior communications major from Allentown.

    “Are you learning?” Gutmann asked her.

    “I am,” Diamacoune answered.

    “I am, too,” Gutmann said.

  • He showed up for what he thought was a routine appointment in Philly. ICE was waiting for him.

    He showed up for what he thought was a routine appointment in Philly. ICE was waiting for him.

    On Oct. 16, Rian Andrianzah walked into a Philadelphia office of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for what he thought was a routine biometrics appointment. He expected to be fingerprinted and photographed and sent on his way.

    Instead, while his wife waited in an outer room, he was arrested by ICE ― and now faces deportation in a case that has angered the city’s Indonesian community.

    Andrianzah, 46, is among a growing number of immigrants whose families say they showed up for in-person appointments or check-ins, only to be suddenly handcuffed and spirited into detention.

    Green-card applicants, asylum-seekers, and others who have ongoing legal or visa cases have been unexpectedly taken, part of a Trump administration strategy, lawyers and advocates say, to boost the number of immigration arrests and to deport anyone who can possibly be deported.

    “ICE was waiting for him,” said Philadelphia immigration attorney Christopher Casazza, who represents Andrianzah and his family. “In 15 years, I have never once seen somebody arrested at their biometrics appointment ― except in the past few months.”

    Andrianzah legally entered the United States on a visitor’s visa in February 2000, but did not return to Indonesia. He was placed in removal proceedings in 2003, and a judge issued a final order of deportation in November 2006. His appeal was denied two years later.

    The removal order was never enforced, as had been common for what the government then saw as low-priority immigration violators. Some people with final orders have lived in the U.S. for decades.

    In the ensuing years, Andrianzah worked factory and warehouse jobs ― and married Siti Rahayu, 44, also of Indonesia. They made a home in South Philadelphia, parents to two U.S.-citizen children, a son, age 8, and a daughter, 15.

    Andrianzah and his wife went to USCIS that day as part of her application for a T visa, available to people who have been victims of human trafficking. In an interview with The Inquirer, Rahayu said she was sent to the U.S. in 2001 by relatives who saw her as a means to pay off a debt, delivering her to an underground organization that puts people in low-paying jobs, then keeps them working indefinitely.

    Siti Rahayu of Philadelphia, here on Thursday, November 6, 2025. Her husband Rian Andrianzah walked into United States Citizenship and Immigration Services office for a routine visit but he was sent to Moshannon detention center to await deportation.

    Casazza, of the Philadelphia firm Palladino, Isbell & Casazza LLC, said Rahayu has a strong case for a T visa, which offers permission to live in the U.S. and a path to permanent residency and citizenship.

    As her husband, Andrianzah would receive those same benefits under her visa.

    That’s why, Casazza said, it makes no sense for ICE to confine and deport him. Once his wife’s visa was approved, Andrianzah would be able to legally live in the United States, the attorney said.

    Asked about Andrianzah’s arrest and the couple’s situation, a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokesperson in Philadelphia said in a statement: “Due to privacy issues, we are not authorized to discuss this case.”

    Andrianzah is being held at the Moshannon Valley Processing Center, an ICE detention facility in Clearfield County, Pa.

    As President Donald Trump presses his deportation agenda, what were routine meetings with federal authorities have now become risky for immigrants. Advocates say many of those arrested were following the rules and doing what the government asked:

    • On May 27, the wife of a Marine Corps veteran was detained in Louisiana after meeting with USCIS about her green-card application, CBS News reported. Paola Clouatre, 25, said she came to the U.S. as a child with her mother, but was abandoned as a teenager and unaware that the government had ordered them deported. She spent about eight weeks in custody before being fitted with an ankle monitor and released.
    • On June 3, federal agents in New York City arrested at least 16 immigrants who showed up for check-ins, after a private contractor working with ICE summoned them to urgent appointments, The City, a news organization, reported.
    • On Oct. 22, a 21-year-old California college student was arrested by ICE at an appointment at a USCIS office in San Francisco, Newsweek reported. Government officials said Esteban Danilo Quiroga-Chaparro, a Colombian national and green-card applicant, had missed mandatory meetings, though his husband said that was untrue.
    • On Oct. 23, a Venezuelan couple pursuing asylum were arrested during a check-in at the ICE office in downtown Milwaukee, Urban Milwaukee reported. Diego Ugarte-Arenas and Dailin Pacheco-Acosta sought protection after fleeing their homeland in 2021. An ICE spokesperson told the news agency that “all aliens who remain in the U.S. without a lawful immigration status may be subject to arrest and removal.”

    “There’s a lot of risks right now,” said Ana Ferreira, who serves on the executive board of the Philadelphia chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

    Some clients went into immigration appointments knowing there was a possibility they could be detained, she said. Others were shocked to be taken.

    “None of this would have happened years ago,” Ferreira said. “It’s a completely different landscape.”

    Siti Rahayu of Philadelphia holds a photograph of her husband, Rian Andrianzah. He walked into a United States Citizenship and Immigration Services office for what he thought would be a routine visit but was sent to the Moshannon detention center to await deportation. Photograph taken on Thursday, November 6, 2025.

    Rahayu said that on Oct. 16, she completed her own biometrics appointment, then grew concerned when her husband did not appear. She asked the staff what was happening.

    “They [said they] don’t know anything, and they say this is new for them,” Rahayu said.

    Finally someone told her: He’s gone. Rahayu fears for her husband’s health in custody because he suffers from diabetes, which impairs his vision.

    The local Indonesian American community reacted immediately, supported by Asian Americans United, the advocacy group. An estimated 2,000 Indonesians live in Philadelphia, the 10th-largest community in the nation.

    “It has sparked so much outrage,” said Kintan Silvany, the civic-engagement coordinator at Gapura, which works to empower local Indonesian Americans. “People are asking how they can help, how they can donate. A lot of people don’t think this can happen to us.”

    Andrianzah said through his wife that he wished to thank everyone who has tried to help him and his family, that he is grateful for their care and concern. Supporters have raised about $13,000.

    Each year thousands of people physically report to ICE or related immigration agencies for mandatory check-ins.

    Some immigrants are required to appear every couple of weeks, some once a month, others once a year. The appointments help immigration officials keep track of people who in the past have been low priorities for deportation, allowed to live freely as they pursue legal efforts to stay in the United States.

    Biometrics appointments are usually brief sessions, perhaps half an hour, at which the government captures fingerprints, a passport-style photo, and a signature. The immigrant may also be asked to provide information like height and weight.

    Despite the fresh risk of being arrested on the spot, immigrants have little option except to show up. Many types of immigration applications require in-person appearances. And failure to appear for a required ICE appointment can by itself result in an order for removal.

    “They’re trying to grab everybody, wherever they can,” and that included Andrianzah, Casazza said. “ICE is going to do their best to deport him.”

  • DA Larry Krasner is unusually silent after charging a record number of Philly cops in grant theft scandal

    DA Larry Krasner is unusually silent after charging a record number of Philly cops in grant theft scandal

    Late in the afternoon on Nov. 7, a Friday, the Philadelphia Police Department announced that nine current and former police officers had been charged with conspiring to defraud the city by using a grant-funded youth boxing program to pad their salaries.

    It was the largest number of Philly officers charged together with misconduct in nearly 40 years — a seemingly splashy case for District Attorney Larry Krasner, a progressive prosecutor who has made charging cops a cornerstone of his two terms in office.

    Yet Krasner has been unusually quiet about it.

    The district attorney was traveling in Switzerland for a conference when the charges became public. His office declined to comment, held no news conference, and issued no public statements — in stark contrast to his trumpeting of police misconduct cases in the past.

    Krasner has charged dozens of police officers since taking office in 2018. But he did not publicly acknowledge his largest booking to date until The Inquirer approached him at an unrelated news conference, nearly a week after these most-recent charges were filed.

    And even then, he was reluctant to talk about it.

    “We had probable cause that they committed the crimes,” Krasner said Thursday. “Having said that, I wanna be very clear: There are a lot of great cops in the city. … I don’t think that this group of nine should in any way taint the rest of them.”

    Prosecutors accuse Nashid Akil, former captain of the 22nd District in North Philadelphia, and eight of his officers of stealing $44,576 in taxpayer-funded anti-violence grant money between January and September 2022, according to charging documents.

    Those funds came from a $392,000 city grant awarded to Epiphany Fellowship Church to support Guns Down, Gloves Up, a boxing and youth mentorship program that Akil founded at his nearby district building. No one from the church was charged, and Krasner said Thursday the church should not be “tainted” by the allegations against police.

    Former Captain Nashid Akil, shown here while at the boxing program Guns Down Gloves Up, at the 22nd District, in Philadelphia, Friday, October 7, 2022.

    City employees are prohibited from receiving grant dollars. Yet after vowing in the grant application that police time would be volunteered, Akil, using the church as a pass-through, allegedly paid himself and eight district officers for their work as boxing instructors, an arrangement that came to light through an Inquirer investigation in 2023.

    Police now say some officers were paid during their scheduled shift hours.

    A law enforcement source familiar with the case said the district attorney’s office concluded its probe into the grant scheme months ago. Krasner did not approve the charges until Oct. 31, according to a police department spokesperson. That was days before the Nov. 4 election, when Krasner was handily reelected to a third term. The defendants began surrendering to authorities three days later.

    Police Commissioner Kevin Bethel issued a statement after the arrests saying he was “deeply troubled” by the officers’ alleged actions and “particularly disappointed by the involvement of a former commanding officer.”

    But neither Krasner nor his spokesperson responded at the time to repeated requests for comment.

    On Thursday, Krasner attributed the timing of the charges to logistical issues with bringing in the nine codefendants.

    Akil was forced to resign in February 2023 after The Inquirer’s reporting on the boxing program, and three other officers who allegedly took the money had since resigned. Bethel has moved to fire the five active officers.

    Only one of the nine officers listed an attorney in court records, and that lawyer could not be reached for comment.

    Officials at Epiphany Fellowship Church did not respond to a request for comment.

    An unusual silence

    The last time nine officers were charged together in Philadelphia was in 1986, for taking bribes to conceal an underground gambling ring.

    An Oct. 14, 1986 article in the Philadelphia Daily News shows the last time nine current and former Philadelphia police officers were charged following a single investigation.

    Since the charges were filed in the boxing program scandal, Krasner’s office has put out nine news releases — but nothing on the nine officers charged.

    It’s a departure from how the typically loquacious district attorney has handled previous allegations of police misconduct.

    In 2021, for example, when The Inquirer was reporting on widespread abuse of the department’s injured-on-duty program, Krasner said he believed some officers were “gaming the system, and in my opinion, committing crimes by engaging in fraudulent practices to stay home.” The disability system was reformed and hundreds of officers returned to work, but no criminal charges were filed.

    The next year, Krasner issued a lengthy news release after the arrest of Officer Daniel Levitt on perjury and related charges, stemming from an allegedly illegal search that led to the recovery of a handgun. The charges against Levitt were initially dismissed but have since been refiled.

    In 2023, Krasner was again out front in announcing the arrest of former Officer Patrick Henon for sexually assaulting young girls. Henon pleaded guilty.

    In May, Krasner called a news conference after a jury convicted two former detectives convicted of making false statements about DNA evidence.

    A month later, when Donald Suchinsky, a former homicide detective, was sentenced to prison for sexually assaulting relatives of murder victims, Krasner appeared outside the Criminal Justice Center to condemn Suchinsky’s conduct and urge any other victims to come forward.

    And in July, Krasner again held a news conference to criticize what he called a lenient sentence of former Officer Mark Dial, who was paroled following his voluntary manslaughter conviction in the shooting of Eddie Irizarry.

    “I am deeply disappointed with a verdict that I think makes people lose faith in the criminal justice system,” Krasner said.

    A sensitive issue

    In contrast, when approached by reporters Thursday, Krasner requested an advance list of questions about the alleged grant misappropriation, then huddled privately with two of his top prosecutors for several minutes before offering little comment.

    Asked about his reticence toward this case compared with past cases, Krasner alluded to outside concerns.

    “We have to do certain things in court in a certain kind of way, and we have to operate with our partners, and that’s what we’re going to do,” he said.

    He declined further questions.

    Krasner’s uncharacteristic silence has not gone unnoticed by nearly a dozen communications consultants, lawyers, and law enforcement officials, who spoke with The Inquirer on the condition that they not be named.

    They speculated that Krasner might be downplaying the arrests due to political sensitivities or because — unlike in cases of wrongful arrests and shootings — there is not a clear victim in this case, outside of city taxpayers. Some acknowledged that there could also be legal reasons why Krasner would decline to draw additional attention to the arrests.

    Carl Day, a pastor who runs Culture Changing Christians, noted that Krasner is allied with Black clergy members who have supported his political campaigns. Day suggested that the district attorney might be trying to avoid further scrutiny into the church that was in charge of the grant.

    “My hope and belief is that it’s a level of respect,” Day said. “In this work, you become scrutinized a ton and placed under microscopes, especially when you are a Black-led organization and getting government money.”

    The boxing program scandal is one of several incidents that have raised concern about the city’s oversight of millions of anti-violence grants, scores of which have been awarded to small nonprofits in the Black community.

    Day said nonprofit leaders need to be held accountable for misspent funds, but he argued that Black-led nonprofits, many of which do not have the financial resources of large organizations that typically get city grants, face heightened scrutiny.

    If that is the case, Day said, he is puzzled why Krasner wouldn’t come out and say so.

    “It’s to be continued,” he said.

  • A charity offered free MRIs to screen for brain cancer. Doctors worry they’re not worth the risks.

    A charity offered free MRIs to screen for brain cancer. Doctors worry they’re not worth the risks.

    Sherri Horsey Darden has no family history of brain cancer, nor has she been having persistent headaches, seizures, or any other symptoms that could suggest a tumor.

    But when she heard the Brain Tumor Foundation, a New York-based charity, was offering free magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans in Philadelphia, she made sure to get an appointment.

    “A lot of times people have things and don’t know,” she said.

    She received her scan at Triumph Baptist Church of Philadelphia in North Philadelphia, where the foundation was offering scans last week to the general public. She’ll receive her results within a couple weeks.

    The foundation has hosted these screening events for more than a decade, with the goal of promoting early detection of brain tumors.

    Using MRI scans for preventive health screening has grown increasingly popular in recent years, with celebrities like Kim Kardashian touting expensive whole-body scans on social media.

    But many doctors worry that the risks outweigh the benefits. They say that screening MRIs of the brain could lead to unnecessary surgeries and anxiety, and that catching a brain tumor early wouldn’t always change a person’s outcomes. These scans are not typically covered by insurance if not ordered by a doctor, and can cost anywhere from $1,000 to $10,000.

    “There, to date, is no data available at all that would suggest that this is a useful approach,” said Stephen Bagley, a neuro-oncologist at Penn Medicine’s Abramson Cancer Center.

    In the best scenarios, preventive medical screening can help catch diseases early when they are most treatable, and give people peace of mind. But they can also lead to overdiagnosis, false positives, unnecessary stress, and costly follow-up procedures.

    This is why expert panels carefully evaluate which screening tools should be recommended to the general public. Decisions by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, considered the gold standard for evidence-based preventive care, weigh the potential harms involved against the likelihood of improving outcomes.

    Even the most common screenings for cancer, like mammograms for breast cancer and PSA tests for prostate cancer, have faced controversy and shifting guidelines regarding who should get them and how frequently they should be administered.

    There is no medical evidence showing that mass MRI screening is helpful. Still, all spots for the foundation’s multiday screening event at Triumph Baptist Church were claimed. Zeesy Schnur, executive director of the foundation, said they aim to scan 100 to 150 people in each city.

    Juanita Young, her husband, and her friend all booked consecutive appointments last week. Though she hasn’t had any symptoms that would make her think she had brain cancer, she signed up “just wanting to know,” she said.

    Juanita Young, her husband, and her friend all booked consecutive appointments to get screened.

    Philadelphia visit

    The idea for the early detection campaign came from Patrick Kelly, a now retired neurosurgeon who started the foundation in 1998.

    He was frustrated to see the majority of his brain cancer patients die from the disease, and felt that treatment would be more effective if the tumors were found earlier, explained Schnur, who has been at the foundation since 2000.

    Kelly envisioned a future where, similar to going through the scanners at an airport security checkpoint, people could get a full scan of their body, “and then this piece of paper would pop out and say, ‘Hey, you have a problem here,’” Schnur recalled.

    The foundation offers brain MRIs for free at their events, covering the cost of administering the scan and having a radiologist read it. They use a portable MRI machine that only scans the brain and takes approximately 15 minutes.

    The foundation has chauffeured its machine all over the country through its “Sponsor-A-City” program, which allows people to donate the funds needed to bring the unit to a city of their choice. They usually pick cities that are demographically diverse.

    The event in Philadelphia was sponsored by Alexandra Schreiber Ferman, who lives in the area, through the more than $50,000 she raised from running the New York City Marathon.

    Schreiber Ferman’s paternal grandfather died from glioblastoma and was a patient of Kelly’s. Her family has been involved with the foundation since its inception.

    Schreiber Ferman got her first scan five or six years ago, after she had been having headaches. She pressured her parents to get her in for an MRI when the foundation’s unit was in Brooklyn.

    “Thankfully, everything was OK. I just was stressed out,” she said.

    Having a family history of the cancer makes her and her family more alert when it comes to headaches and other symptoms. Schreiber Ferman received her second scan Tuesday morning at the screening event.

    Alexandra Schreiber Ferman sponsored the Brain Tumor Foundation’s event in Philadelphia.

    She said her family and people at the foundation feel that these scans should be “something that’s routine,” like mammograms and skin checks.

    “My goal would be that getting a brain scan becomes just a routine part of aging,” she said.

    Her father, who serves as chairman of the foundation, wants other people to have the chance to get screened and has helped sponsor past city visits.

    However, he himself has only gotten one screening since the program first started, and no longer wants any more.

    “My dad is adamant that he does not want to get a scan. I think for him, ‘ignorance is bliss,’” she said.

    What doctors say

    Screening tests have to meet certain criteria in order to become standard practice, explained Richard Wender, chair of family medicine and community health at Penn and former chief cancer control officer for the American Cancer Society.

    A national leader in cancer screening, he would not recommend that people undergo MRIs to screen for brain cancer.

    The first criteria for a screening tool to be recommended for the general population is that the disease is common, he said. The disease must also come with a high risk of harm or death and must have stages, so that it can be found before it causes symptoms.

    Lastly, available treatments for the disease have to be able to reduce the risk of serious outcomes.

    Brain cancer is unlikely to ever meet that criteria, Wender said, mainly because it isn’t common enough. There also isn’t sufficient evidence that finding a brain cancer earlier reduces the risk of a person dying from it.

    For example, the most common malignant brain tumor, glioblastoma, is so aggressive and invasive from the start, it is always considered a grade four tumor, noted Bagley, who serves as section chief of neuro-oncology at Penn.

    These cancers grow so quickly that the time between the tumor developing and someone showing up to the emergency room with symptoms is typically on the order of months, he said.

    “You cannot cure it, no matter when you find it,” Bagley said.

    A subset of brain tumors called grade two gliomas are slow-growing enough that catching them earlier could give a patient a better outcome. However, “it’s so rare, you’d have to do so many of these MRIs to find those tumors,” he said.

    Another issue with screening the general population is that there will inevitably be false positives.

    Some abnormalities in the brain might look like possible tumors on MRIs but turn out to be harmless.

    Yet, the person would have to undergo a medical procedure, such as a brain biopsy, to prove that it isn’t cancer.

    “You end up putting the patient through invasive brain procedures, lots of anxiety, and existential distress for what ends up to be nothing,” Bagley said.

    The same goes for benign brain tumors like meningioma, the most common type of brain tumor in adults. Roughly 39,000 cases are reported each year in the United States. A “very tiny percentage” of these ever become malignant, and it’s unknown if catching them early would help the patient in the long run, Bagley said.

    It might just mean the patient has to get MRIs every year for the rest of their life, or get surgery to remove a tumor that probably never would have been become a problem.

    Some of these patients have ended up seeking follow-up care from Ricardo Komotar, a neurosurgeon who directs the University of Miami Brain Tumor Initiative in Florida, after finding out they had benign tumors from screening MRIs. He tells these “super nervous” patients that it’s nothing to worry about, but now that they’ve found it, he has to follow it.

    As of right now, there is no good screening mechanism when it comes to the brain, Komotar said. He recommends only imaging a person’s brain if there’s a reason, such as a seizure, weakness, or migraines, or an injury, such as in a car accident.

    “Brain MRIs as screening have not been proven to help and, in my experience, they only hurt,” Komotar said.

    More research needed

    Ethan Schnur checks on James Brown as he has his early detection brain tumor screening at the Brain Tumor Foundation event in Philadelphia.

    When the foundation first started offering scans, they were finding potential abnormalities in one out of every 100 people they screened. Those included anything from a brain tumor, to silent stroke, to an aneurysm.

    One example was a man from Staten Island who had no symptoms, but through the scan, found out he had a nonmalignant brain tumor. He got surgery to remove it.

    “He called us afterward to thank us,” Schnur said.

    Their stance is that these MRIs should be part of standard of care, so that anyone who wants one has the option.

    The foundation has partnered with Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian in New York City for a formal research study using data from their screening events.

    John Park, the lead researcher and chief of neurosurgery at NewYork-Presbyterian Queens Hospital, said the study will help assess whether screening MRIs for a general population could be useful. They aim to screen up to thousands of patients.

    “We don’t know if it will be effective or not,” Park said.

    If the study were to suggest the scans are effective, there would still need to be a large randomized trial to validate those conclusions, Wender said.

    Park’s team will also look at demographic information in an effort to identify risk factors for brain tumors and other abnormalities.

    Research into risk factors could help justify whether certain populations should get routine screening MRIs, Bagley said. He noted that patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a rare genetic disease that predisposes people to developing cancer, are already recommended to get whole-body MRI scans yearly because they’re known to be at such high risk.

    Other than those patients, “we don’t really have any way to say this large group of patients is at high risk for this type of brain tumor,” Bagley said.

    A handful of patients have ended up seeking care at Penn from Bagley after paying for a whole-body MRI from a private company. These are people who were “completely fine” before happening to find a brain tumor on their scans, he said.

    One of them was diagnosed with glioblastoma.

    He isn’t sure yet whether being diagnosed earlier will actually extend the patient’s survival time. It might just mean the patient gets a few months’ head start on treating the tumor.

    “It’s totally unclear if he did himself any justice by finding this terrible brain cancer any earlier. It’s incurable either way,” Bagley said.

  • DuPont’s latest spin-off, Qnity, soars with demand from Nvidia and AI

    DuPont’s latest spin-off, Qnity, soars with demand from Nvidia and AI

    The latest DuPont Co. spin-off, Qnity, supplies Nvidia, the world’s most valuable company, and other Big Tech giants with high-tech materials to make the high-speed and artificial-intelligence systems that have drawn billions in new investments and sparked the data center building boom.

    Though DuPont is a larger company, Qnity, which started trading Nov. 1, is worth more on the stock market, a sign that investors expect its Big Tech customers — chipmakers like AMD and electronics giants like Samsung — will buy Qnity’s Kalrez sealants, Pyralux adhesives, and other products.

    And they expect it will do so faster than DuPont can boost sales to its remaining brands such as Tyvek and Corian.

    With expected sales of $7 billion next year, DuPont has a stock market value of about $16 billion. Qnity, with sales expected to approach $5 billion, is worth $20 billion. Both companies are profitable, but Qnity’s margins are bigger.

    Based a five-minute walk from DuPont headquarters in suburban Wilmington, Del., Qnity was given away to DuPont shareholders — one share for each two DuPont shares. The company employs around 10,000 at 39 factories and 17 labs worldwide, including 1,300 in the Wilmington area.

    It was the latest in a string of sales and spin-offs that have cut DuPont sales from $62 billion in 2017 — after Edward Breen of New Hope, now DuPont’s executive chairman, took over with a mandate to cut costs and boost shareholder payouts — down to an expected $7 billion next year.

    DuPont’s Chestnut Run Plaza headquarters in Wilmington, Del. The company’s November 2025 spin-off, Qnity, is based at the south end of the campus.

    Qnity’s price quickly spiked from an initial $70 a share to around $100 in early November trading, and stock analysts predict it will go higher on relentless demand for AI and high-speed computer chips.

    The company’s name (pronounced CUE-nitty) was “inspired” by the letter Q’s role in electrical notation. It trades as Q on the New York Stock Exchange.

    Q is “the symbol for electrical charge and unity,” Qnity CEO Jon Kemp said in a meeting with DuPont investors.

    What does Qnity make?

    Qnity’s profit margin before financial expenses is a robust 30%, but analysts warn the chip business might not stay so profitable.

    “Wafer starts,” a count of how many new silicon pieces are being used to build new chips, rose roughly 5% this year. Qnity is growing faster than the industry because some of its products are in special demand, “fueled by the adoption of leading-edge technologies for AI applications,” Kemp told the investors earlier this year.

    Qnity’s “AI-driven technology ramps” include densely layered circuit boards that allow more computing power in a smaller space and barriers to keep data centers from overheating. The company also sells to aerospace, and military equipment and vehicle makers.

    At an August investor meeting, JPMorgan analyst Steve Tusa noted the soon-to-be-spun-off company’s reliance on AI growth. He asked whether the global slump in consumer electronics demand was likely to end, broadening the company’s growth prospects.

    Kemp, in response, acknowledged that consumer demand had been “weak,” noting that “all of the growth for the last several quarters is really coming from AI-driven applications.”

    Worth more in pieces?

    DuPont has sold or spun off many of its once-familiar products in recent years.

    In August, DuPont agreed to sell its Aramids fiber business, which includes Kevlar bulletproofing, to a private equity-backed firm for $1.8 billion. The company sold its remaining nylon lines and other polymer businesses for $11 billion in 2022.

    DuPont still makes Tyvek house and medical wraps, Corian counters, Molykote lubricants, FilmTec membranes, and medical-device packaging systems, automotive battery and aerospace parts, as well as water, gas, and mining products.

    In all, it’s a radical reduction from the 1950s, when DuPont was the most valuable company in the world, and owned major stakes in General Motors and other customers, or in the 1990s, when DuPont owned oil giant Conoco and attempted a drug-making joint venture with Merck.

    DuPont was dropped from the Dow Jones 30 industrial stock index in 2017. It remains one of the S&P 500 stocks, a list Qnity has also joined.

    The Qnity spin-off is just the latest in the dismemberment that began before Breen joined DuPont and became chief executive and chairman in 2015. Breen, who similarly broke apart the former Tyco International in the 2000s, came to DuPont at a time when some investors were discontented with low profit growth.

    As CEO, Breen led a merger with Dow Chemical, enacted in 2017. He gutted central staff including a large part of the company’s research establishment, then broke up DowDuPont into three successors, and kept selling or spinning off business groups.

    The result is a string of DuPont successor companies, most still based in the Wilmington area.

    They include Corteva Agrisciences, a 2019 combination of DuPont and Dow pesticide lines and genetically engineered seeds with offices at the old DuPont headquarters. The company expects more than $17 billion in sales this year.

    Corteva, whose U.S. operations are mostly in the Midwest, announced this month that it was moving corporate offices from the suburban Wilmington office park that also houses DuPont and Qnity to the former DuPont headquarters complex in central Wilmington.

    The Rodney Square side of the former DuPont Co. headquarters in Wilmington is now home to its chemical spin-off, Chemours. The western end of the same campus will soon be home to offices of Corteva, which includes DuPont’s former pesticides business. This 2019 photo also shows a statue of independence leader Caesar Rodney, which was removed from its pedestal after protests in 2021.

    Another global leader in pesticides, Philadelphia-based FMC, owns some former DuPont products and the company’s Newark, Del., research farm.

    In 2020, DuPont sold its food and biosciences business to a smaller company, IFF, for $7.3 billion. Both companies had plants in the Philadelphia area.

    In 2015, before Breen joined DuPont, it spun off a group of its old chemical businesses, calling it Chemours. It has joined DuPont in settling some of the long-running chemical pollution claims for damages related to Teflon and other former DuPont products.

    In 2013, DuPont sold its automotive paints group, Axalta, to private-equity giant Carlyle Group. Carlyle took Axalta public the next year, making three times what it paid DuPont for the South Philly-based company.

    Axalta and Corteva shares have roughly doubled in value since DuPont spun them off, though the S&P 500 index is up more. DuPont itself trades at about the same price it was worth just before the Dow merger in 2017. Chemours shares are also roughly flat since it went public. (Update: Axalta announced its sale to rival AkzoNobel NV in November, 2025.)

    With its stock trading at a premium over DuPont’s, thanks to investor faith that digital demand will keep going up, Qnity has given shareholders more to celebrate — so far.

  • Vic Fangio and Howie Roseman have rebuilt the Eagles defense that won a Super Bowl

    Vic Fangio and Howie Roseman have rebuilt the Eagles defense that won a Super Bowl

    It’s the goal-line stand that will have everyone talking, and rightly so, since it was the sort of set of plays from which hard-nosed, November NFC football is made.

    The Lions had the ball, second-and-goal from the 6, trailing by seven points, late third quarter. Safety Reed Blankenship hit Jahmyr Gibbs on first down for just 2 yards. Defensive tackle Jalen Carter limited Gibbs to 1 yard on the next play. Deadline addition Jaelan Phillips pressured Jared Goff and forced an incompletion on fourth down.

    The Lions never got inside the 29-yard line again.

    The Eagles won, 16-9, Sunday night at Lincoln Financial Field despite an offense aptly described by wideout A.J. Brown as a “bleep-show.”

    Why?

    Because that Eagles defense, which led them to a Super Bowl win nine months ago, suddenly, again, is elite.

    “The defense is [bleeping] balling right now,” said grateful offensive tackle Jordan Mailata.

    But, elite?

    Nakobe Dean, who shined all night, paused and considered.

    “We gotta continue to get better,” he said.

    They’d just held the Packers to seven at Lambeau Field, then allowed the NFC’s highest-scoring offense its fewest points in 16 games, counting playoffs. The Eagles travel to Dallas on Sunday, where the Cowboys are shaking in their boots.

    Really, how much better can the Eagles’ defense get?

    After a virtuoso performance in Game 9 last Monday night at Green Bay, the defense — constructed by general manager Howie Roseman and coordinated by Vic Fangio — delivered a tour de force six nights later. Zones and man, blitzes and stunts, batted passes and sacks and so much more.

    Most important: Sixteen points surrendered against two very good quarterbacks who play for playoff-likely teams that are above .500.

    Linebacker Jihaad Campbell (left) celebrates with Adoree’ Jackson after the cornerback broke up a pass in the fourth quarter.

    Two touchdowns in eight quarters.

    Good job, Vic.

    But …

    Bravo, Howie.

    Bravissimo!

    “You saw those guys, all those guys, out there making plays,” said quarterback Jalen Hurts, appreciatively.

    Phillips, Carter, and Dean featured all night. Among them, only Carter had featured before Game 5, since Dean was hurt and Phillips was in Miami, and frankly, Carter didn’t feature much, since he wasn’t in shape until Game 6.

    Sunday marked the first game that the Eagles defense played as it originally was comprised. Thanks to Roseman, it also featured reinforcements.

    For the first time this season both Dean, the middle linebacker, and defensive end Nolan Smith started without snap-count limitations; Smith had been hurt, too.

    “Holy [bleep],” Mailata said. “Them coming back — game-changer. Really a game-changer.

    They were joined by Philips, a pricey trade-deadline pass rusher who’d debuted brilliantly Monday night in Green Bay, and by old friend Brandon Graham, who’d unretired four weeks earlier and also had played his first game as a 2025 Eagle in Green Bay.

    Not coincidentally, the Eagles surrendered just seven points to the Packers, their stingiest performance of the season … by 10 points. The seven-point allowance was 17 fewer than the Packers’ average, which ranked 14th.

    Eagles linebacker Jalyx Hunt goes after Detroit Lions quarterback Jared Goff in the fourth quarter at Lincoln Financial Field.

    The Lions averaged 31.4 points entering Sunday night, second-best in the league. They scored 22 fewer than they averaged.

    The Lions entered with a pedestrian 37.5% third-down conversion rate, but ranked fourth in fourth-down conversions at 72.2%.

    They converted 3 of 13 third downs, or 23%.

    They converted zero of 5 fourth downs, or, yep, 0%.

    “Those are turnovers in our mind,” coach Nick Sirianni said. “Five-for-five, the way we look at it.”

    How?

    Playmakers all over Lincoln Financial Field, wearing the midnight green.

    First series: Dean covered the running back out of the backfield, Jordan Davis pushed the pocket and deflected the pass, and Cooper DeJean intercepted it. That led to a field goal.

    Second series: Phillips sacked Goff, which led to a punt.

    Third series: Carter dropped David Montgomery for a 2-yard gain on third down, which led to a punt.

    Eagles edge rusher Jaelan Phillips sacks Lions quarterback Jared Goff as Jalen Carter moves in.

    Fourth series: On fourth-and-1, Moro Ojomo grabbed Gibbs low, Carter hit him high, and they stoned him at the line of scrimmage.

    Fifth series: Dean hit Goff on third down, which forced an incompletion that forced fourth down, and the Lions tried a fake punt and failed.

    Then, a Detroit touchdown on two long passes. Nobody’s perfect.

    The Eagles came close.

    Dean, a linebacker, covered star wideout Amon-Ra St. Brown and helped force a turnover on downs.

    Then, the goal-line stand.

    Later in the second half, Dean would blanket Jameson Williams. On the next play, he’d sack Goff.

    Phillips had another pressure.

    Jalyx Hunt pressured Goff twice in three plays with just under six minutes to go.

    If there was a standout, well, it was Dean’s day, but name them all. Carter, Phillips. Ojomo for a minute. Cornerback Quinyon Mitchell — superb.

    They all were good. So, so good.

    Just like Vic called it. Just like Howie built it.

  • Epstein’s emails are the end of America as they ruined it

    Epstein’s emails are the end of America as they ruined it

    The ex-skipper of Harvard, and the professor(s). A billionaire (from Silicon Valley), but not many wives — and featuring guest appearances by the MAGA publisher of Breitbart News, a former Israeli prime minister, a past president … and a future one.

    This metaphorical Epstein Island — people sending, or featured in, the emails of the late disgraced financier and sex fiend Jeffrey Epstein, released last week by a House committee — is kind of like TV’s Gilligan’s Island … if everyone had a truckload more money than Thurston Howell III, and was also a lot dumber.

    Last week’s stunning document dump by the House Oversight Committee of Epstein’s emails, mostly from the 2010s, among 20,000 pages from his estate, can and should be viewed through several prisms. The main media focus has understandably been on his leering close friend in the 1990s and 2000s, now-President Donald Trump, who is mentioned many times over. There’s arguably no “smoking gun” directly linking Trump to any specific act of sexual misconduct in Epstein’s lurid world, but more than enough innuendo that POTUS 45 and 47 “knew about the girls,” and possibly much more, to fuel a Watergate-level frenzy.

    I don’t know if the emails, so far, are enough to take down Trump, but the president should be even more worried — and he probably is — about the much deeper rot that’s already been laid bare about the entire decrepit class of men (because they’re almost all men) who rule the world with atrocious grammar amid a nonstop booty call.

    I’m not a financial expert, but if I had disposable cash, I’d avoid the hyperinflated artificial intelligence bubble and invest in a company that manufactures pitchforks.

    The QAnon folks were almost there! These emails prove there really is a global cabal of the world’s most powerful and wealthy elites, linked to the most repulsive child sex trafficking operation we know about. No, it doesn’t involve pizzeria basements or blood-drinking rituals — at least as far as we know so far. But these missives do reveal the evil banality of the world’s most rich and famous, whose vast pursuit of money or teenaged blondes or whatever knew no bounds, or, at long last, any sense of decency.

    The Nation’s Jeet Heer nailed it when he wrote after the email dump that the Epstein scandal “has always been a scandal about the ruling class as a whole, not one individual or political party,” adding that “Epstein trafficked not just in the bodies of the children he abused but also in social connections that could bring elites together.”

    And ignorance is no defense. By the 2000s, the murky but wildly rich financier’s predilection for underage girls was hardly a secret. In 2008, in a sweetheart deal, he pleaded guilty in Florida to a charge of procuring a 17-year-old girl for prostitution, but prosecutors had evidence linking him to about three dozen other girls, including some as young as 13. And yet, most of the emails from powerful people released by the committee came after those revelations, up through his 2019 second indictment and his death in a federal jail in Manhattan under mysterious circumstances.

    Some of the most telling exchanges are not the more than 1,000 emails from Epstein, his convicted partner-in-crime Ghislaine Maxwell, or their pals that mention Trump (who, wisely for him, never learned to use email), but involve Epstein’s misogyny-soaked friendship with Larry Summers, the former U.S. Treasury secretary and Harvard president.

    Summers had lost that plum Ivy League post in 2006, in good measure because of a speech in which he’d questioned the intellect of top female scientists. During the 2010s, when the Obama administration or cable TV wasn’t still treating him as an economic seer, the married Summers turned to this convicted sex trafficker for advice on how to hit on a younger, attractive protégée, or just to commiserate.

    “I’m trying to figure why [the] American elite think if u murder your baby by beating and abandonment it must be irrelevant to your admission to Harvard,” Summers wrote Epstein in 2017, referring to this episode at the school. “But hit on a few women 10 years ago and can’t work at a network or think tank. DO NOT REPEAT THIS INSIGHT.”

    Larry Summers, president emeritus and professor at Harvard University, during a panel session at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in January 2023.

    You may remember that 2017, the first year of Trump’s first presidency, is when the #MeToo movement against male sexual harassment and misconduct exploded. That email from Summers is one of the very few that even alludes to the social upheavals of the tumultuous 2010s that also included Occupy Wall Street, the tea party, Black Lives Matter, and other movements targeting privilege and inequity. Most of this prattle is instead just rich dudes talking about how to get themselves richer … or just how to get off.

    Still, as Heer captures in his analysis for the Nation, the thought-to-be-secret communications of the elites increasingly involved enhanced security for the 1 Percent and ways to silence protests as that decade devolved, including scheming with the former Israeli prime minister, Ehud Barak, about launching a cybersecurity start-up. The world’s shrewdest investors knew the pitchfork bubble was coming before you did.

    In the six years since Epstein was found dead, however, it has been the political backlash his email correspondents, like the Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel, have heavily funded that has advanced while warding off the revolution. This was the ultimate goal of this sordid chat group: to desperately cling to their dying hierarchies around patriarchy and white supremacy, and to portray the #MeToo movement as going too far, when it’s obvious it didn’t go nearly far enough. It was during those fraught years that they stumbled into the perfect avatar in the unlikely Trump presidency.

    Now, it’s a headline that Trump “knew about the girls,” but, of course, he knew about the girls. They all knew about the girls, and every Thiel and Summers and the con artist formerly known as Prince Andrew knew they’d bought more security with a U.S. president who shared their “wonderful secret.”

    It starts to make sense that Team Trump even deployed the White House Situation Room to fight a congressional vote for a wider release of the Epstein files, as if these secrets were a nuclear bomb headed for Chicago. To be sure, this all-out war against disclosure — along with Trump’s bizarre order for the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate only Democrats mentioned in the letters — might be to hide that Trump did more with Epstein’s bevy of young girls than just “know about” them.

    But on some level, Trump’s White House must also realize that the Epstein file is the Jenga piece that brings the whole thing crashing down — the end of America, or, more to the point, the version of America getting financially drained, sexually abused, and basically ruined by all the people getting emails from jeevacation@gmail.com.

    The timing couldn’t be better, or worse, for this midnight of the elites. The overblown stock market fueled by an AI hallucination is set to burst any moment, and new hiring is already grinding to a halt — just as the price of everything from steak to coffee goes through the roof, and health insurance is doubling or tripling for millions of Americans. When this perfect storm strikes, an electoral bloodbath in the 2026 midterms is the best outcome Trump can hope for, on a list of dire possibilities.

    It’s no coincidence Trump is accelerating the pace of dictatorship, not because he’s at the peak of power, but because he knows he’s running out of time. Thus, the wag-the-dog war drums off Venezuela are pounding louder, and the muck of naked corruption — from Swiss gold bars to real estate deals with the murderous Saudi prince — is getting filthier. All of it haunted by the ghost of Jeffrey Epstein.

    There’s one other thing about the Epstein files I feel compelled to mention. I’m also in them — well, sort of. On Feb. 12, 2019, for reasons we’ll never know, Epstein emailed his ethically conflicted journalist pal Michael Wolff a column I’d just written, with the words “please note.”

    The piece was tied to the recent arrest of another close friend, the New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, for soliciting sex in strip mall massage parlors near Palm Beach, and the moral decay of Kraft and his Florida neighbors, Trump and Epstein. It came at a moment when Epstein and Wolff were talking about ways to use his inside knowledge about Trump as leverage when the walls of federal prosecution were closing in. Nine months later, Epstein was dead — weird coincidence.

    In that column, I wrote, “Kraft’s embarrassing charges come at one of those rarest of moments — when everyday people are suddenly realizing who doesn’t have power in America, who does, and that something can be done about this.” If Epstein did, in fact, read the piece, he knew what was coming. Now Trump knows it, too — and America will never be the same. FEEL FREE TO REPEAT THIS INSIGHT.

  • Gio Reyna seizes his moment with the USMNT, and is now in the World Cup race

    Gio Reyna seizes his moment with the USMNT, and is now in the World Cup race

    From the moment the U.S. men’s soccer team’s starting lineup was announced Saturday, all eyes were fixed on Gio Reyna.

    Not only was he about to play for his country for the first time since late March, but he was starting for the first time since last year’s Copa América group stage finale — a loss to Uruguay that sent the U.S. out in the group stage on home soil, and sent manager Gregg Berhalter out of his job.

    Reyna, 23, didn’t make any of Mauricio Pochettino’s squads until the Nations League final four in March because of a groin injury. Then he didn’t play in the semifinal loss to Panama, and was an ineffective second-half substitute in the third-place game loss to Canada.

    For all Reyna’s talents — and he has perhaps the most natural talent of any U.S. player besides Christian Pulisic — Pochettino declared him not “ready to play in the way that we expect from him” on the eve of the third-place game.

    Gio Reyna hadn’t been with the U.S. men’s soccer team since March.

    That was how far he had fallen, in terms of fitness, form, and playing time at his club, Germany’s Borussia Dortmund.

    Nor was he done falling. Reyna went to the Club World Cup with Dortmund instead of the Gold Cup and the friendlies before it, because Dortmund wanted him at their games and Pochettino didn’t want players at the friendlies whom he wouldn’t have afterward.

    Would that be salvation? No, it was almost the opposite. Reyna got off the bench only once in Dortmund’s five tournament games, a mostly useless 12-minute cameo in the group stage finale.

    Only after that did he finally leave for newer pastures, a move many outsiders had hoped to see for years. Borussia Mönchengladbach bought him for about $4.5 million up front and $3 million in incentives. It was miles below what Dortmund expected when a 17-year-old Reyna made his first-team debut in early 2020.

    Gio Reyna watched almost all of Borussia Dortmund’s Club World Cup run this summer from the bench, finally leaving the club afterward.

    It was to be a fresh start, but it barely started before Reyna suffered the latest of seemingly countless muscle injuries in September. He returned to action in mid-October, but only as a substitute.

    So it was a pretty big surprise when Pochettino called him up to the national team this month. But over the course of the week in Chester, it felt increasingly inevitable that he would start Saturday against Paraguay at Subaru Park.

    Meeting the moment

    Right on cue, there he was, and the message was clear. This was Reyna’s shot. Would he take it?

    The answer came within four minutes.

    It was a broken play out of a corner kick, the ball pinging around off all manner of limbs on both teams. Eventually, it fell to Max Arfsten, and he chipped a cross into the crowd. Reyna rose highest and met it with a header that caromed in off the crossbar.

    As the crowd roared, Reyna ran toward the corner flag, pointing to the U.S. badge on his jersey. Within seconds, his teammates had swarmed him to celebrate.

    “I know the kind of player he is, and I’m just really happy for him — he deserves it,” said Medford’s Brenden Aaronson, who started with Reyna in the attacking midfield spots. “He’s been through a lot with injuries, with all this stuff. But whenever he plays for the national team, he’s always there, and it’s awesome to see. … He’s confident in his ability, he knows what he can do, and that’s the beauty of him.”

    There wasn’t time in the moment to point out that Reyna has not in fact always been “there” when with the national team. That was the whole point of the 2022 World Cup scandal that nearly torpedoed him.

    When that goal went in, though, it was a moment for his immense burden of history to be a privilege, not a weight. The tally was his ninth for the U.S., passing his legendary father Claudio’s eight.

    Gio Reyna (left) celebrates with Brenden Aaronson (center) and other teammates after scoring the game’s opening goal.

    And for once, Claudio wasn’t invoked because of that scandal, or all the times Claudio interfered with U.S. Soccer officials before then, or yelled at referees from the sidelines in Gio’s youth days, or by genetics passed his ego on to his son.

    By the time Gio emerged from the locker room to meet one of the biggest media packs at a U.S. game in quite a while, he had already texted with his father.

    “It was just fun, love,” Gio said. “He was obviously happy for me that I passed him, but I had no idea. So he was more making fun of me for the fact that it was my first header I’ve ever scored.”

    The pressure on him is earned

    The negative side of the burden struck twice after that. On Paraguay’s 10th-minute equalizer, Reyna was late and slow to challenge Junior Alonso before he launched the long ball that sprung Miguel Almirón for a dazzling assist on Alex Arce’s goal.

    In the 50th, Reyna had a look to shoot in the 18-yard box and didn’t take it, choosing instead to dribble into what became a crowd of defenders.

    Those were small moments, but they mattered. Just as pressure is a privilege, Reyna knows his talents bring extra scrutiny.

    The scale tilted back his way in the 71st. Reyna combined superbly with Folarin Balogun to create the winning goal. The man of the hour had delivered again, and the U.S. went on to close out a 2-1 win.

    “I think in the end, performances like this that can help everybody here,” Reyna said. “But I want to have, more importantly, seven or eight good months in the rest of the season with Gladbach. And then I believe if I keep performing like I did tonight, then I’ll have a good chance to make the team and have an impact there, too.”

    There’s still a ways to go, and as Pochettino said, plenty for Reyna to do to earn a seat on the plane next summer. But in a moment when he was asked to step up, he did, and in national team soccer there are never many moments. So when you get one, you have to take it.

    “He showed why he started, and yes, confirmed that he’s a player that needs to improve because he needs to play more in his club,” Pochettino said. “But we can see today that he was great: scored and assisted. And the way that [he has] always the capacity to read the game, and find the free space in between the lines, I think that was a nightmare for Paraguay, and I think he did a very good job.”

    Reyna thanked Pochettino in turn, with some notable humility.

    “I knew it was an opportunity for me to to show that I belong here,” he said. “He’s been great with me all week, working with him, and just trying to give me the freedom and the confidence to sort of be myself. So I can’t thank him enough, obviously, for the start and just for the relationship that we’ve really built this camp.”

    Gio Reyna (center) working in practice during the week.

    The stakes only get higher from here, and so does the quality of opponent the U.S. will face. After meeting Uruguay on Tuesday in Tampa, Fla. (7 p.m., TNT, Universo), to close out this month, it’s expected that March’s games will see big-time opponents from Europe. Portugal, France, and Belgium are reportedly on the radar, with Atlanta’s Mercedes-Benz Stadium set as a fittingly big-time venue.

    Time will tell if Reyna earns the right to be there. For now, he’s only in the race. But that alone is the best place he’s been in for a long time.

  • Meet Gary, the cat who ended a friendship and cost $25,000 in legal fees

    Meet Gary, the cat who ended a friendship and cost $25,000 in legal fees

    First they were roommates, and then they were friends. But after Jessica Yang and Nicole DeNardo couldn’t agree on who should keep Gary — the exotic shorthair that Yang bought and DeNardo had been taking care of — it took a Common Pleas Court judge to decide.

    The two former roommates say they disagreed over whether Yang had given Gary to DeNardo or whether it was a temporary arrangement. In December 2024, Yang sued DeNardo to make her return the cat.

    “She said I was unfit to be a pet parent,” Yang said. “She said I was childish and selfish for even wanting Gary back. She kept asking me to consider the feelings and preferences of Gary.”

    Two lawyers contacted for this story say that situations like this one are on the rise, though the money spent on such a case — Yang spent $20,000, DeNardo, $5,000 — is a bit remarkable.

    “People love their animals, and people are willing to spend a lot of money in legal fees to reclaim their animals,” said Rebecca Glenn-Dinwoodie, a Doylestown-based family and animal lawyer not involved in the case.

    But for the two women, the fight over the small, cuddly cat with blue eyes became a catastrophe that dragged on for a year.

    “She just didn’t want me to have him,” DeNardo said. “It was personal. It was about beating me.”

    Nicole DeNardo at her home in Center City.

    How it started

    Yang, 33, purchased Gary for $1,000 when she was living in Pittsburgh in 2018. She named him after the SpongeBob SquarePants TV show character Gary the Snail.

    In the spring of 2022, Yang moved from New Mexico to Philadelphia. She said that with a new contract as a nurse anesthetist, she expected to travel for work every two weeks, making a roommate situation ideal.

    She and DeNardo, 31, met on a Facebook group for people seeking roommates and soon moved into an apartment together in Graduate Hospital. DeNardo, who works in finance, often worked from home, spending a lot of time with Gary.

    Yang and DeNardo each said they became friends and travel buddies. They took snowboarding trips to Vermont and Colorado and hiked at Lake Havasu, Ariz.

    They even got matching alien tattoos together. Yang said hers was a nod to her time living near Roswell, the UFO tourist town in New Mexico. DeNardo said the alien paired well with her tattoo of Saturn, a planet linked to her zodiac sign of Capricorn.

    Yang said as the apartment’s lease was coming to an end around March 2024, she was going through a difficult time. She and her long-term boyfriend had just broken up. She had just changed jobs. And, she had just bought a house in Passyunk Square that needed extensive renovations.

    That was when, as she remembers it, DeNardo offered to take the cat. “I was like, how convenient for Gary,” Yang said. “And I thought it would be good for her, too.”

    That summer, Yang commissioned a portrait of Gary, surrounded by snowboards, trekking poles, and other symbols of the two women’s friendship. There were two prints, both framed, one for each of them.

    A detail shot of a piece of art Jessica Yang commissioned featuring her cat, Gary, and mementos from her friendship with Nicole DeNardo. She gave a second copy of the art to DeNardo.

    Going to court

    Things began to go south when Yang said she learned that DeNardo had changed Gary’s last name at the vet — from Yang to DeNardo — and added her name to the cat’s microchip. DeNardo, Yang said, considered the cat hers.

    It’s one of several details DeNardo remembers differently. DeNardo said the vet’s office changed the cat’s last name, not her. As for the microchip, which would help people identify Gary’s owner if he were to get lost, she said she added her name for practical reasons — she was the one who was around.

    DeNardo said she was often the one who took care of Gary. She fed him, she said, and took him to the vet. She even “cleaned his eyeballs” every day — something shorthair cats often need.

    “He was always in my life, always on the windowsill next to me,” DeNardo said.

    She provided a timeline showing she’d spent more time with Gary than Yang. She offered lists of friends who would attest Gary was her cat — a fact many people in her lifefound mildly amusing, since her father and her brother are also both named Gary.

    Jessica Yang holds her cat, Gary, at her home Sunday, Nov. 9, 2025.

    DeNardo said she believes that somehow, the issue became personal after a 2023 incident where she told Yang they needed to take the cat to the vet.

    “I think she viewed that more as a personal attack,” DeNardo said. “For me, this was always only about Gary’s well-being.”

    After a yearlong process that involved a hearing and a bench trial, the court ruled in Yang’s favor. Yang proved she had purchased the cat, and DeNardo had to give him up.

    DeNardo blames the Pennsylvania legal system, which views animals as property. “You can spend years scooping litter, cleaning his eyeballs, and the court tells you none of that matters, because pets are property,” she said.

    The law

    A few other states, such as New York, do define pets the way DeNardo had hoped the court would view Gary, said Daniel Howard, an associate family law attorney at Petrelli Previtera in Center City.

    “Some states have pet custody statutes that look similar to what we see in child custody, looking at the welfare of the animal,” Howard said.

    Howard pointed out that in September the Pennsylvania House of Representatives passed a bill that would change how pets are recognized in divorce proceedings. (The bill would have to pass the state Senate and get the governor’s approval for enactment).

    However, even if this bill were to pass, it would not apply to cases where the two people aren’t married, Howard said.

    Gary, an exotic shorthair, relaxes on the couch Sunday, Nov. 9, 2025.

    Still, he said, attitudes are changing around the ways animals should be viewed by the courts. Laws that worked well for farm animals don’t fit as neatly for cats or dogs.

    “For a lot of people, their pets really are their children,” Howard said. “And I think there needs to be some kind of an update to look at that.”

    Glenn-Dinwoodie said the situation also speaks to the need for people — even if they’re just roommates, or friends — to put things in writing when they enter a living arrangement.

    “Just have clear conversations, clear expectations, but also [take] that extra step so that, if ownership is ever disputed … you have enough proof. Because the court needs proof,” she said.

    For Yang, the whole episode felt like a misuse of time and resources. It left her wanting to raise money for animals, “because $25,000 could save a lot of cats.”

    DeNardo said the dispute showed her that doing what you think is right doesn’t always lead to the outcome you want. At her apartment, she gestured toward the window, where she said Gary spent countless hours watching the birds that would perch outside.

    “He’s just a really playful, sweet, cat,” DeNardo said. ”He was my buddy… I just hope he’s OK and has all the things he needs, and is living a good life. If he’s happy, I’m happy.”

    Clarification: This article has been updated to reflect DeNardo’s assertion that she took care of Gary even when Yang was home.