Blog

  • James Bradley, co-author of ‘Flags of Our Fathers,’ dies at 72

    James Bradley, co-author of ‘Flags of Our Fathers,’ dies at 72

    James Bradley, who turned his curiosity about his father’s time in the Navy during the Battle of Iwo Jima — and the long-held but ultimately mistaken belief that he was in the iconic photograph of six servicemen raising the American flag on Mount Suribachi — into the bestselling book Flags of Our Fathers (2000), died on June 5. He was 72.

    His daughter Alison Cinnamond confirmed the death but declined to provide further details.

    Flags of Our Fathers, which Mr. Bradley wrote with Ron Powers, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, spent 46 weeks on the New York Times bestseller list, climbing to No. 1, and was adapted into a 2006 film directed by Clint Eastwood. Ryan Phillippe played his father in the movie.

    Flags tells the stories of the six flag-raisers — John (Doc) Bradley and five Marines — through the brutal, five-week-long battle against Japanese forces on Iwo Jima, a tiny volcanic island.

    The battle claimed the lives of some 6,800 American service members, including three of the flag raisers. Bradley’s narrative followed the survivors — his father, Rene Gagnon, and Ira Hayes — on the national war bonds tour that they starred in upon their return to the United States and their sometimes difficult postwar lives.

    Doc Bradley, who became a funeral director in Antigo, Wisc., told his family little about his time in combat, or the fact that he had received the Navy Cross, the branch’s second highest award for valor, for treating and rescuing a wounded Marine while under mortar and machine-gun fire on Iwo Jima.

    But after his death in 1994, his family rummaged through boxes he had left behind. One of the items was a letter to his parents, postmarked Feb. 26, 1945, three days after the flag-raising photo was taken by Joe Rosenthal of the Associated Press. An image of the Pulitzer-winning photo appeared on the 3-cent stamp and on millions of war-bond drive posters. The picture also inspired the design of the Marine Corps War Memorial in Arlington, Va.

    In his letter, Doc Bradley wrote, “I had a little thing to do with the raising of the American flag and it was the happiest moment of my life.”

    The letter stunned his family.

    “If that was the happiest moment of his life,” James Bradley told the Times in 2000, “why had he never talked about it?”

    For nearly 70 years, there was little, if any, dispute that Doc Bradley was in Rosenthal’s brilliantly composed picture. The Marine Corps had, after all, named the six participants. James Bradley had no doubt of his father’s role, describing in Flags how he had dropped a handful of bandages before joining the other five men at the flagpole where he “gripped the pole in the cluster’s center.”

    But in 2014, an article in the Omaha World Herald described serious doubts raised by amateur historians that Doc Bradley was in the photograph. James Bradley was, at first, dubious.

    “Listen, I wrote a book based on facts, told to me by guys who had actually been there,” he told the newspaper. “That’s my research. That’s what I trust. At the end of the day, the truth is the truth. Everything is possible. But really?”

    He eventually took a deeper look at the paper’s findings and became convinced that his father had not been in Rosenthal’s picture but had been in a less dramatic one, with a smaller flag, taken earlier in the day on Feb. 23 by a Marine photographer, which the service branch confirmed.

    In 2016, a Marine Corps investigation — prompted by findings in a documentary, The Unknown Flag Raiser of Iwo Jima — concluded that Harold Schultz, a private first class, was the man in the image long identified as Doc Bradley.

    Cinnamond, James Bradley’s daughter, said in an interview that her father didn’t feel that the book was diminished by the finding, but that he wanted the Marine Corps to get its facts straight about who was actually in the photo.

    Indeed, it was not the only misidentification in the photo. In 1947, the Marine Corps said it had credited Henry Hansen for being in the photo when it had actually been Harlon Block. In 2019, the Marines determined that Gagnon, one of the Marines featured in Bradley’s book, had “contributed to the flag-raising,” but that Harold Keller was actually in the photo.

    James Joseph Bradley was born on Feb. 18, 1954, in Antigo. He was one of eight children of John and Elizabeth (Van Gorp) Bradley. James received a bachelor’s degree in East Asian history from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1977.

    Mr. Bradley was, at first, a traveling cookware salesperson, then built a career as a corporate events and video producer. Without training as a writer or researcher, he began writing Flags on his own, but his proposal was rejected by 27 publishers, one of whom told Mr. Bradley that “no one wants to read a book about old men weeping into the telephone.”

    One of his agents then brought Powers on as a collaborator; he had won the 1973 Pulitzer for criticism while writing for the Chicago Sun-Times. Bantam Books soon acquired the book.

    The book was one of several successful works during a decade that detailed the bravery of American soldiers during World War II, among them Stephen Ambrose’s D-Day: June 6, 1944 (1994); Tom Brokaw’s The Greatest Generation (1998); Steven Spielberg’s film Saving Private Ryan (1998); and the HBO miniseries Band of Brothers.

    In his review of Flags of Our Fathers in the Times, journalist Richard Bernstein called it “most affecting not because of its graphic portrayal of men at war, although its portrayal rivals Saving Private Ryan in its shocking, unvarnished immediacy.”

    Mr. Bradley continued to write about Asia in three subsequent nonfiction books. In Flyboys: A True Story of Courage (2003), he told the stories of nine American pilots, including the future President George H.W. Bush, who were shot down by the Japanese near the island of Chichijima during World War II. While Bush was rescued by an American submarine, the other eight were captured and executed by the Japanese.

    In The Imperial Cruise: A Secret History of Empire and War (2009), Mr. Bradley wrote critically about what he saw as President Theodore Roosevelt’s diplomatic mistakes in Asia.

    “Bradley explores the racist underpinnings of Roosevelt’s policies and paradoxical embrace of the Japanese as ‘honorary Aryans,’” Publishers Weekly wrote in its review, but added, “Bradley’s critique of Rooseveltian imperialism is compelling but unbalanced.”

    And in The China Mirage: The Hidden History of American Disaster in Asia (2015), Mr. Bradley described what he viewed as America’s long-running misunderstanding of China, dating to the early 1800s.

    He also wrote a novel, Precious Freedom (2025), set during the Vietnam War.

    Mr. Bradley’s three marriages ended in divorce. He is survived by two daughters, Cinnamond and Michelle Bradley, from his marriage to Eileen Heywood; two more children, Jack Bradley and Ava Bradley, from his marriage to Laura Shuler; two sisters, Kathleen and Barbara Bradley; five brothers, Steven, Mark, Patrick, Joseph and Thomas; and two grandchildren. He was also married to Shelley Tupper.

    In 1998, Mr. Bradley, his mother, and three of his brothers traveled to Iwo Jima at the invitation of Gen. Charles C. Krulak, the Marine Corps commandant. After climbing to the spot on Mount Suribachi where the celebrated Rosenthal photo was taken, Mr. Bradley asked that everyone, including the Marines in attendance, sing the only songs that Doc Bradley said he knew: “Home on the Range” and “I’ve Been Working on the Railroad.”

    “I knew, without looking up, that everyone standing on the mountaintop — Marines young and old, women and men; my family — was weeping,” Mr. Bradley wrote in Flags. “Tears were streaming down my own face. Behind me, I could hear the hoarse sobs coming from my brother Joe.”

    This article originally appeared in the New York Times.

  • Trump, claiming vandalism, says Reflecting Pool will be drained

    Trump, claiming vandalism, says Reflecting Pool will be drained

    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said on Saturday that “multiple individuals” had been arrested for vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, and that problems with a more than $14 million renovation project had become so severe that the pool would have to be at least partly drained for “necessary repairs.”

    The president’s announcement late Saturday, made on social media, was his starkest acknowledgment of the pool’s rapid deterioration in recent days. The water this week became covered by clouds of blooming algae, which were obscuring a floor that had just been painted a shade that Trump has called “American flag blue.” The paint then began to peel off, making it a tourist destination for unusual reasons.

    Among those accused of vandalism was David Carter Hearn, 67, a cyclist and three-time Olympian as a canoeist who says he stopped at the site Friday just to have a look, then reached down to touch a strip of peeling blue paint mixed with the algae.

    The U.S. Park Police arrested Hearn shortly after, accusing him of destroying government property, a crime that can carry up to a 10-year prison sentence. Hearn denies the charge.

    “I was just a curious, concerned citizen,” he said in an interview. “I guess I was there at the wrong place, wrong time.”

    The administration has not released the names of others accused of vandalizing the pool, a crime that Trump said Saturday could lead to “years in jail.” In a later post, he said without evidence that vandals had “poured corrosive and destructive chemicals into the Pool.”

    The project, one of many Trump is undertaking around the capital as the United States nears its 250th birthday, has faced intense scrutiny, including from engineers and other experts who warned that the hastily undertaken project was unlikely to undo the problems that have plagued the pool for decades. A construction company tied to Trump was awarded a no-bid contract and painted the bottom of the pool.

    Trump said Saturday that he had met with contractors earlier in the day to discuss the state of the pool.

    The Interior Department said this week that agency workers had “killed the algae” that had expanded with heat and humidity. But on Friday afternoon, the water was stained by clumps of algae where National Park Service staff members had scrubbed away bright green blooms along the bottom of the basin. The pool’s new coating was also missing large sections, including a gap roughly the size of a park bench. Underneath appeared to be the original concrete basin.

    Hearn, of Bethesda, Md., said that he was on a 50-mile bike ride before stopping at the pool, and that Park Police officers detained him for more than four hours Friday at a facility south of the National Mall without allowing a phone call. They also did not say more about why he had been arrested, he added. The White House and Park Police did not respond to requests for comment.

    Late Friday, Trump claimed on social media that the “inside surface that was just installed” had been damaged by vandals.

    Hearn said that he had “reached into the water to feel the characteristics” of a dislodged paint piece “still attached to the bottom.” He compared his actions to those of Jonathan Karl, an ABC News reporter who lifted a detached piece of paint at the pool Thursday in a video the news organization published.

    “I didn’t remove anything,” Hearn said. “I was bending and feeling this 2-millimeter-thick, rubbery flap.”

    Until his retirement 18 months ago, Hearn ran a company selling special materials for building canoes. That, he said, made him particularly interested in the materials contractors had used before the paint at the base of the pool began peeling.

    Hearn said that he had already received offers of pro bono representation following his arrest.

    “I’m getting a lot of support from my community,” he added.

    This article originally appeared in the New York Times.

  • A diocese tries to protect its 29-foot Jesus from Trump’s border wall

    A diocese tries to protect its 29-foot Jesus from Trump’s border wall

    LAS CRUCES, N.M. — At sunrise, when the day’s first golden glow washes over the 29-foot-tall limestone Jesus atop Mount Cristo Rey, Lourdes Castañon feels the presence of the divine. “The rays catch it,” he said, “and, oh man, I think I’m touching the face of God.”

    Countless pilgrims from around the world journey to the sacred site just on New Mexico’s side of the southwestern border, but Castañon fears for its future. At the mountain’s base, President Donald Trump wants to build his border wall, and the small Catholic diocese that owns the land is trying to stop it.

    The Department of Homeland Security is attempting to use eminent domain to seize 14 acres of desert from the diocese, based in Las Cruces, N.M., so it can raise about 1.5 miles of new wall. The church claims a towering steel barrier would desecrate a holy landmark and violate the religious liberties of those who wish to worship there.

    “It will look like a scar on Mother Earth,” said Castañon, 74, a volunteer with the Mount Cristo Rey Restoration Committee, an independent group that works to keep the site clean and accessible.

    Homeland Security sued to wrest control of the land from the diocese last month, offering about $180,000 as compensation. The diocese, which had pleaded with the Trump administration to consider alternatives to a wall, countered in court, arguing that the lawsuit flouted the First Amendment and laws to further protect religious freedom.

    “The wall is a physical manifestation of this government’s attitude toward migrants,” the diocese said Friday in a legal brief that detailed its arguments and included testimony from local bishops and others. “Nothing could be less Catholic.”

    The ongoing federal case is the latest example of opposition to a border wall Trump wants to extend across the entire southern frontier. Since Trump’s first term, aggrieved landowners, environmentalists, and Native American tribes have fought the president’s barrier-building, tying up government lawyers in court.

    The Trump administration has claimed broad authority over wall construction, but opponents have secured a few tentative wins, including this year in Texas’ Big Bend National Park, where U.S. Customs and Border Protection had to change plans after a bipartisan outcry.

    Now, an administration that holds itself up as a defender of the devout is facing off with Catholics asserting their freedom of religion.

    “This is not a battle between the church and the government; it’s a battle between symbols,” said Deacon Jim Winder, the chancellor of the diocese. “One is a 29-foot statue of Christ the King, which is meant to symbolize unity and hope, and the other is a 30-foot iron monstrosity that symbolizes exclusion and division. Our symbol was there first. The wall is an in-your-face insult.”

    Customs and Border Protection has acknowledged Mount Cristo Rey’s significance, but the agency has argued that the site is also popular for drug smugglers and human traffickers. The mountain is the only stretch of land in the area not fortified with tall fencing — Cristo Rey was long considered a natural barrier — and the federal government now sees the gap as a security problem.

    Part of the new segment will be built on federal land and the rest “will have no adverse impact” on Mount Cristo Rey, the government has said, because it won’t block the trail leading up to the Christ sculpture. Construction will occur several hundred feet below the statue.

    “Anyone who spent 30 seconds examining a map of Mount Cristo Rey and the southern border would realize how ludicrous these claims are,” John B. Mennell, an agency spokesperson, said in a statement, referring to the church’s arguments.

    Mount Cristo Rey, known also as Sierra de Cristo Rey, near El Paso, Texas, and the suburbs of Mexico’s Ciudad Juárez, saw its first pilgrim in the early 1930s, after a local priest, Father Lourdes Costa, gazed out his window at the distant peak and envisioned a soaring crucifix at its summit.

    Costa made the challenging trek and shared his premonition with the Diocese of El Paso, which purchased the land from the state of New Mexico. In the nearly 90 years since the sculpture was completed, hundreds of thousands of faithful have traveled to the top, some on their knees and others barefoot, over rough ground studded with yucca and creosote.

    It also attracted those looking to cross into the United States illegally. As migrant apprehensions soared, members of the restoration committee, among the mountain’s most frequent visitors, noticed an uptick in vandalism and crime at the site.

    Not all of Mount Cristo Rey’s devotees oppose the wall. Ruben Escandon, whose parents and grandparents preceded him as Cristo Rey caretakers, worried that border-related safety concerns have held the site back from being considered one of the world’s premier Catholic attractions, like the statue of Christ the Redeemer in Rio de Janeiro.

    He is opposed to Trump’s immigration agenda, he said, but the surrounding segments of the border wall are funneling migrants onto his cherished mountain. The barrier needs to be completed, he said.

    “It has nothing to do with immigration policies; it has to do with keeping Mount Cristo Rey safe,” said Escandon, a former police officer who specializes in performing cross-border marriages. “Hopefully it will allow the traditional visitor to come without fear.”

    But environmental and migrant rights groups say the new wall would disrupt a fragile desert ecosystem and make an already dangerous journey over the border more deadly.

    The diocese said it respects the Trump administration’s authority to secure the area. When Border Patrol officials asked in recent years to carve a roadway through Cristo Rey property, the diocese agreed and charged the government nothing. The church has not objected to the agency’s use of sensors and cameras around the mountain.

    But a wall is too far, Winder said.

    Barrier construction elsewhere has threatened or destroyed other cultural sites, including a 1,000-year-old Native American etching that federal contractors mistakenly bulldozed in Arizona this year. And the blasting involved in building near Cristo Rey could damage the statue, he said.

    Lawyers for the Justice Department have been pushing to accelerate the case, filing motions to condemn the property and take possession of it in quick succession. “Time is of the essence,” they argued, because the government has already contracted with construction companies and could be fined if the project is delayed.

    “We’re just getting run over,” Winder said.

    A Justice Department spokesperson, Natalie Baldassarre, said “the taking is authorized by law” and that it “will not impact activity or use of the shrine.”

    Kathryn Brack Morrow, an attorney for the diocese, said the government’s urgency was not justified.

    “This is a self-inflicted emergency,” Morrow said. “The diocese has raised weighty religious liberty concerns that warrant deliberate consideration.”

    Contractors have already begun working at the base of Cristo Rey. On a recent morning, 15-year-old Fernanda Vazquez hiked up the winding trail with her family and looked down at the ribbon of dirt where the wall may soon be built.

    “It just breaks my heart,” she said. “It just doesn’t seem right.”

    This article originally appeared in the New York Times.

  • A Delco man built a Harley in his dad’s basement and could win $10,000 for it

    A Delco man built a Harley in his dad’s basement and could win $10,000 for it

    Behold the bike: a custom Harley-Davidson Panhead chopper painted deep purple replete with classic stylings, an iconic Wassell Banana gas tank, and sharp-as-knives merlot-colored acrylic-glass fins that throw shark-fin shadows when the riding is smooth and the sun hits just right.

    And designed and built by Jack Weidmayer in his dad’s small basement shop over the last three years.

    The custom chopper has won Weidmayer, 27, of Newtown Square, a finalist spot in the Biltwell People’s Champ, an international motorcycle-building competition hosted by the Southern California motorcycle company on June 26.

    Designed to spot up-and-coming, grassroots chopper builders — Weidmayer, a Villanova communications grad who rode his first motorcycle in 2018 — the annual, crowd-voted competition features builders from all over, competing for a $10,000 prize and a coveted chance to display their homemade hogs at Harley-Davidson’s Born Free motorcycle show, on June 27 and 28 in Southern California.

    Jack Weidmayer, 27, of Newtown Square, poses with two officials from the Biltwell motorcycle company earlier this year.

    “I was super surprised to even get in,” said Weidmayer, who works as a machinist at a West Chester tool company when he’s not building bikes.

    The final round of the competition — which annually draws hundreds of thousands of votes — began in September when Biltwell scoured the amateur ranks for prospective builders. As of Monday, Weidmayer and five other finalists are competing in five days of online voting. On Friday, the finalists will ride their creations to the legendary Southern California biker bar Cook’s Corner, where final voting takes place — and a winner is declared.

    “It’d be nicer if he was interested in something a little safer,” joked Weidmayer’s father, Mark, a former Harley-Davidson mechanic, who builds custom bikes and supervised his son. “I cherish the opportunity to be able to have a close relationship with my son — and for us to share the same interests and be extremely enthusiastic about bikes.”

    The bike is a beaut, said the proud dad.

    “It’s 100% his design,” said Mark Weidmayer.

    Jack Weidmayer has been building choppers out of the small shared shop in his dad’s basement for about five years. Using scrap parts — picked up at local swap meets and shows — and mostly basic hand tools found in the average enthusiast’s garage, he has built eight bikes, including a pinstripe S & S-powered Panhead featured in Choppers Magazine in 2024. In February, an initial round of online voting winnowed 16 contestants down to the finalists.

    Weidmayer has worked on the current bike every day for nearly a year, he said.

    “I can’t think of one thing that fit correctly or went according to plan,” he said. “This is probably my most modified bike to date.”

    An aspiring journalist in college, Weidmayer said he discovered his love of building custom bikes during the pandemic, when he first asked his father to show him the ropes.

    It’s the challenge of envisioning a design — and then making it ride from bare-bones parts that he loves most, he said, before loading his chopper onto a trailer for the 2,700-mile journey to the competition.

    “I know so many people who’ve done lots of cross-country trips, I’m scared to call myself a real-deal biker,” he said. “It’s more just having an idea and making it tangible that is the more appealing aspect for me.”

    And he, too, cherishes the time with his dad, he said.

    “He has been an invaluable resource in any build I have done, especially this one,” said Weidmayer. “I would not have finished this project on time or nearly as nice quality without his advice, and pro tips.”

    In true Philly fashion, he considers himself an underdog in the People’s Champ, noting that most of the other builders have bigger social media presences than his own — an unenviable lot in an online voting competition.

    Regardless, he’s truly proud of the purple acrylic-glass fins, which he said give the bike a much more aggressive silhouette.

    “I’ve had that idea in my head for three years now, and it is incredible to see it completed,” he said.

  • Ukrainian attacks prompt Russian-held Crimea to halt civilian gasoline sales

    Ukrainian attacks prompt Russian-held Crimea to halt civilian gasoline sales

    Officials in Russia-occupied Crimea suspended civilian gasoline sales Sunday as Ukraine ramped up attacks on fuel supplies on the Black Sea peninsula.

    Gov. Sergey Aksyonov, the Kremlin-appointed head of Crimea, said that overnight Ukrainian strikes killed four people and wounded 28 others. He did not specify the target of the attack.

    He later wrote on social media that local gas stations would halt all sales to nonstate companies and individuals for an undefined period.

    “Fuel will be sold only to government agencies that ensure the functioning and security of the Republic of Crimea,” Aksyonov said. “I ask everyone to remain calm and to only trust official sources of information.”

    Ukrainian forces have repeatedly targeted fuel supplies to Crimea in recent weeks, triggering the worst energy crisis in the region since it was illegally annexed by Russia in 2014.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a statement Sunday that a Crimean oil depot as well as an oil transport facility in Russia’s southern Krasnodar region were among the targets. He described the attacks as part of Ukraine’s “long-range sanctions” against Russia’s energy infrastructure.

    “Russia understands only strength, and our long-range strength is certainly working for peace,” he wrote.

    Russian officials in Krasnodar reported earlier Sunday that a drone strike sparked a fire at a Black Sea oil terminal in the village of Chushka. They said that Ukrainian attacks struck a ferry, killing one person.

    Motorists struggle to find fuel

    The Crimean peninsula has had periodic fuel shortages from Ukrainian strikes before, but the current crisis is the worst since its 2014 annexation.

    At the end of May, authorities restricted the sale of gas to 20 liters (5⅓ gallons) per vehicle owner per week, using prepaid coupons. Those were snapped up immediately following their release on an official messaging app channel, and motorists lined up for hours, waiting to refuel.

    Social networks have been abuzz with requests and advice on where to find fuel, and authorities launched a hotline for tourists in the area who have found themselves trapped.

    Some motorists bring their own gas from Krasnodar and elsewhere via the Kerch bridge, but they are restricted to carrying 100 liters (about 26½ gallons) per vehicle. Some speculators are selling gas at double the market price.

    In a rare public acknowledgment, the Kremlin has recognized the scope of the problem and promised to address the issue quickly.

    However, Ukraine’s successes have highlighted its ability to inflict painful damage on Russia and change the course of the conflict while Moscow’s advances recently have ground to a near halt. On June 11, Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine reached its 1,569th day, surpassing the duration of World War I.

  • For cash-strapped farmers, deal to end Iran fighting comes too late

    For cash-strapped farmers, deal to end Iran fighting comes too late

    NASHVILLE, N.C. – The possible end of the Iran war will not cure the drought that has stunted the wheat crop. It won’t secure soybean export orders caught in the U.S.-China trade war. And it will do nothing to promote competition in agriculture, which would help farmers like Jeff Tyson earn a living.

    Like other growers, Tyson, 55, has seen costs outrun sales this year as the rain grew scarce and government policies added to his burdens.

    Now, the U.S.-Iran agreement to reopen the vital Strait of Hormuz and pursue a lasting peace offers some relief to farmers who have seen their fuel and fertilizer bills soar because of combat in the Persian Gulf. Diesel has not been cheaper since mid-March. Urea fertilizer in recent days sold for less than it did before the fighting began.

    But the financial damage has been done.

    President Donald Trump’s February decision to join Israel in attacking Iran aggravated the farm economy’s struggles. Soybean growers, who were already suffering from the president’s tariffs, are expected to lose money in 2026 for the fourth straight year.

    “There’s no joy left in this farm. When you work 16-hour days and get to the end of the year, and you have to borrow money to pay your taxes, there’s no fun in it. It’s just not worth it anymore,” said Tyson, a fourth-generation farmer, who long ago advised his daughters to look elsewhere for a good life.

    Tough times on the farm are souring some of the president’s most loyal supporters little more than four months before November’s congressional elections. Rural voters backed Trump’s economic policies by a 45% to 43% margin early last year but now disapprove of them 61% to 31%, according to a Reuters-Ipsos poll released this month.

    A separate Purdue University-CME Group survey this month showed that agricultural producers in particular have grown more downbeat. From a high of 75% in December, the percentage of those surveyed saying the country is headed in the right direction fell to 52% in May.

    Farmers represent a key constituency in states that could decide control of the U.S. Senate, including Iowa, Texas, Ohio, and Michigan, as well as North Carolina.

    The president’s signing Wednesday of an agreement that extends the ceasefire with Iran for 60 days follows a lengthy interruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, which curtailed exports from three of the world’s top 10 producers of urea and anhydrous ammonia fertilizer: Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Iran.

    “We’re not going to solve that just because we open the strait. There is still a very big wound there that is going to take time to heal,” said Josh Linville, vice president of financial services firm StoneX, who expects prices to remain higher than usual through next spring.

    On Saturday, conditions in the strait remained fluid. Iranian authorities declared the channel once again closed in response to Israeli attacks in Lebanon — underscoring the fragility of the agreement signed last week. U.S. Central Command denied there was a closure, and said that shipping had increased, with 55 merchant ships and 17 million gallons of oil reaching global markets. U.S.-Iran peace talks were planned for Sunday in Switzerland.

    About an hour’s drive east of Raleigh, Tyson raises soybeans, cotton, sweet potatoes, tobacco, corn, and sunflowers. He runs the operation from a small white house adjacent to a two-lane road. Several buildings and grain silos dot the property.

    With shoulder-length brown hair and a full beard, Tyson is profoundly disillusioned by Washington. Well-funded business lobbyists and entrenched government bureaucrats thwart the will of the people, necessitating a disruptive figure like Trump, he said.

    “I was involved with the [American] Soybean Association for 16 years. I thought I could make a difference,” he said. “I spent a lot of time in Washington and realized that it doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter what you say out here or what you do out here.”

    Tyson remains supportive of Trump’s drain-the-swamp brio, though he objects to the double whammy of import tariffs and income taxes.

    Farmers have been among the biggest losers of the president’s trade wars. After China responded to Trump’s first-term tariffs by purchasing soybeans from Brazil rather than the U.S., he gave farmers $23 billion to offset lost export sales.

    Last year, his April decision to raise U.S. tariffs to their highest mark since the 1930s caused China to again retaliate by halting purchases of American soybeans. Annual sales slumped to just $3 billion from a 2022 peak of nearly $18 billion. Trump’s tariffs on steel and aluminum also translated into higher prices for tractors, combines, and harvesters as well as replacement parts. Separate levies first imposed in 2020 on phosphate fertilizer from Morocco were another irritant.

    Under pressure from larger harvests in South America, soybean prices are down by roughly one-third from their 2022 levels. The combination of higher input costs and lower sales prices leave many soybean farmers needing to borrow money.

    For loans in excess of $100,000, farmers face interest rates of nearly 7%, more than twice the figure from four years ago, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

    “The returns for farmers have been really tough on the soybean side the past few years. They just generally haven’t been making much money,” said Scott Gerlt, chief economist for the American Soybean Association.

    Earlier this month, the administration reduced tariffs on agricultural equipment made of steel or aluminum, such as harvesters and combines, to 15% from 25%.

    The president also sought to reassure farmers by staging a White House event in March, where he promised easier environmental regulations and small-business loan guarantees. By then, $12 billion in farm aid designed to counter what the administration called “four years of disastrous Biden Administration policies” and other nations’ “unfair trade practices” was landing in farmers’ bank accounts.

    “We’re going to prove that the golden age of American agriculture is right here and right now,” Trump said.

    But the most consequential move came last fall when Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping reached a truce in their trade war. In return for lower U.S. tariffs, Xi agreed to resume purchases of American soybeans.

    Almost 100 miles west of Tyson’s farm, Michael McPherson stood in a wheat field where his son-in-law and grandson baled straw. This plot sits among 1,000 acres of soybeans, corn, cattle, and hay that he and his family cultivate.

    McPherson, 57, was another financial casualty of the Iran war. The price of diesel, which powers tractors, jumped by nearly 50% in the weeks before his scheduled April 1 corn planting. Fertilizer costs rose as well. He waited a few days, hoping the market would reset. But crops are not patient. Eventually he had to swallow the extra expense.

    “It’s been a tough year, a tough season so far. Among everything else that’s going on, we’re in the worst drought we’ve ever had this time of year. That’s really putting us in a bind right now. None of our crops are where they’re supposed to be this time of year,” said McPherson, who expects to realize about half his usual harvest from this field.

    Though reluctant to talk politics, he applauds the Trump administration’s efforts to secure better trade terms for U.S. farmers even as he voices frustration with the Iran war.

    Before attacking, he said, the administration should have stockpiled fertilizer to spare farmers crippling price increases. Instead, the war’s costs have eroded profits and forced him to tap his financial reserves.

    “I don’t want to say we’re at crisis levels yet. But something’s got to change,” he said.

    Gary Hendrix, working with his wife and two sons, tills 7,000 acres of corn, cotton, soybeans, peanuts, and wheat in Raeford, about 100 miles east of Charlotte. He failed to turn a profit last year and continues to operate in the red.

    Production costs, including seed and fertilizer, are up about 20% or $100 per acre compared with last year. His last tank of diesel cost $32,000, versus roughly $19,000 in December.

    The Iran war’s end should mean less-expensive fertilizer. But Hendrix worries that the small number of suppliers will use their market power to keep prices high. One of his biggest complaints is the agribusiness consolidation of recent years.

    “It doesn’t really matter whether I’m buying or selling. If I’m trying to buy a tractor or if I’m trying to sell a load of soybeans. You know, I don’t have many places to go,” he said. “They can reserve a four-seat table at any restaurant and decide what my [profit] margin’s going to be.”

    Two companies — Nutrien and Mosaic — account for at least 86% of the phosphate and potash fertilizer market. In March, Bloomberg News reported that the Justice Department was investigating Nutrien, Mosaic, and three other producers for potential antitrust violations. The Federal Trade Commission last month said it had launched a related probe.

    In a statement, Mosaic said fertilizer prices are determined by “a wide range of well‑documented market factors,” not individual companies. Nutrien did not respond to a request for comment.

    Hendrix, a registered independent, said he voted for Trump in 2024. He is undecided about which party he will back in November’s congressional elections. But as the midterms draw near, he sounds lukewarm on the president.

    “He’s done some things that have really been a benefit to ag,” Hendrix said. “And he’s tried some other things that haven’t quite worked.”

  • Trump post seems to push Starmer to resign

    Trump post seems to push Starmer to resign

    LONDON — President Donald Trump appeared to scoop Downing Street on Sunday, announcing that Prime Minister Keir Starmer would resign before any public statement from Starmer himself.

    “Keir Starmer will resign as Prime Minister of The United Kingdom,” proclaimed in a social media post, in which he also asserted that Starmer had “failed badly” on immigration and energy policy.

    Then, Trump added: “I wish him well!”

    Doubts about Starmer’s political future have swirled for weeks since his Labour Party suffered staggering losses in local elections in May, and prospects of a leadership challenge increased markedly on Friday after his most formidable rival, Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham, won a special election for an open seat in parliament.

    Earlier on Sunday, British media had reported that Starmer was considering resigning. Still, Trump’s intervention represented an extraordinary foray into British domestic politics that left some veteran political observers stunned.

    “There is literally no boundary this American president will not bulldoze through,” ITV’s Robert Peston wrote on X.

    Peston also cited a cabinet minister who said that, despite Trump’s “scoop,” Starmer had “genuinely not made a decision to quit.”

    Broadcaster Piers Morgan called it “the final humiliation.”

    Downing Street told the Washington Post on Sunday evening that Starmer and Trump had not spoken over the weekend, raising questions about how the U.S. president came to make such a definitive prediction.

    But it also didn’t mean Trump was wrong about Starmer’s plans. A senior Labour Party MP told the Post on Sunday evening that some Labour Party lawmakers were “being briefed that he will step down tomorrow and that he realizes his position is untenable.”

    Speaking on the condition of anonymity because she wasn’t authorized to discuss the matter publicly, she added that Starmer “no longer has the confidence” of his peers and that it was “only right that he now steps aside.”

    However Trump reached his conclusion, the president’s ties with close European allies are increasingly strained. In recent days, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni accused Trump of lying after he claimed she had “begged” to have her photograph taken with him.

    Relations between Starmer and Trump have been rocky for months.

    Earlier this year, Trump branded Starmer “no Winston Churchill” during a dispute over Britain’s support for U.S. strikes on Iran, and the two leaders did not hold a bilateral meeting at the Group of Seven summit in France last week.

    Starmer led the Labour Party to a landslide election victory just two years ago, but has faced increasing pressure from within his own party and growing calls for him to step aside since the local elections in which Labour and the Conservatives lost badly to Reform UK, the populist party led by Nigel Farage, one of the key architects of Brexit, the U.K.’s departure from the European Union.

    Starmer on Friday vowed to fight any leadership challenge. He has not commented publicly on the matter since then, but briefings from senior lawmakers have suggested that he spent the weekend weighing his position.

    Some commentators have suggested that the question is no longer if Starmer will leave, but how, and when.

    The focus, they say, has shifted to choreography — whether Labour will stage a full leadership contest, with figures such as Wes Streeting, the former health secretary, also entering the race — or rally around a single successor.

    British politics have been remarkably unstable since the 2016 Brexit referendum. If Starmer does announce his resignation, it would usher in Britain’s seventh prime minister in a decade.

    In the special election last week, Burnham won a decisive victory against a Reform UK opponent — a win that for many Labour lawmakers provided a test case of whether Burnham could help reverse Labour’s dire poll ratings of late.

    Starmer, for his part, took to social media on Sunday only to comment on Father’s Day. “Being a dad is my great joy,” he wrote.

  • Can Trump sway another Latin American election? Here’s what to know.

    Can Trump sway another Latin American election? Here’s what to know.

    BOGOTÁ, Colombia — Colombians headed to the polls Sunday in the most polarized election in years, with voters choosing between the country’s governing leftist political movement and a President Donald Trump-endorsed right-wing outsider.

    The vote pits Sen. Iván Cepeda, a longtime human rights activist and ally of President Gustavo Petro, the country’s first leftist president, against Abelardo De La Espriella, a former criminal defense lawyer who vows a sweeping crackdown on guerrilla groups and drug-trafficking gangs.

    The high-stakes contest has drawn international attention following De La Espriella’s endorsement by Trump, who called Cepeda a “Radical Left Marxist.”

    The move marks the latest instance of Trump endorsing right-wing candidates in Latin American elections as the region increasingly shifts toward the right, driven in part by concerns over rising insecurity.

    Who are the candidates?

    Cepeda, 63, is a senator and well-known advocate for victims of Colombia’s decades-long armed conflict. He was also part of the negotiations that led to Colombia’s landmark 2016 peace deal with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia that was meant to help end that conflict.

    Running as the candidate of Petro’s party, he has pledged to preserve many of his policies, including anti-poverty programs, land redistribution efforts, and negotiations with armed groups.

    De La Espriella, 47, is a former high-profile criminal defense lawyer and businessperson with no previous political experience and who spent years living in Florida.

    Nicknamed “El Tigre,” or “the tiger,” he has campaigned as an antiestablishment outsider, though he has long been close to Colombia’s right-wing political power elites as a lawyer.

    Why has the vote spurred controversy in the U. S.?

    Some of De La Espriella’s campaign promises echo policies pursued by other Latin American right-wing leaders, such as Nayib Bukele of El Salvador and Javier Milei of Argentina. His platform includes building 10 megaprisons, shrinking the state, and collaborating with the United States to combat drug trafficking.

    He has also been known to legally pursue his opponents — including journalists. After he received Trump’s endorsement and the support of some Republican lawmakers, De La Espriella, a naturalized U.S. citizen, began warning that he would go after anyone who challenged him, with the assistance of the United States.

    Last week, Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a memo saying that the presence of a progressive activist living in Arizona, Beto Coral, interfered with U.S. foreign policy after the activist criticized De La Espriella. Coral, 40, was detained by U.S. immigration authorities Tuesday, a move decried by Democrats in Congress and by rights groups.

    What are voters focused on?

    Along with complaints about Petro’s rocky four-year-term, voters cite concerns over crime and extortion and the growing power of armed groups in rural areas.

    Violence surged even during the campaign, which saw a presidential hopeful assassinated, two De La Espriella campaign workers killed, and Cepeda’s running mate briefly kidnapped.

    Critics say Petro’s flagship “Total Peace” strategy, which sought negotiated settlements with multiple armed groups, allowed those groups to grow stronger during ceasefires.

    Humanitarian organizations say violence has reached its highest level since the 2016 peace accord, but Colombia remains far safer than it was during the height of the conflict in the 1980s and 1990s.

    While De La Espriella says he will completely abandon peace talks and crush narcotrafficking groups within 90 days, Cepeda has said he will continue his own version of peace negotiations.

    The election is also seen as a referendum on Petro’s presidency. Supporters credit his government with expanding social programs, and increasing the political visibility of historically marginalized groups.

    But critics say his tenure has been marked not only by deteriorating security, but by a troubled state takeover of the health system and runaway spending that has left Colombia with a public debt that is at pandemic levels.

    Why the first round of voting was a surprise

    De La Espriella finished first in the opening round with 43.7% of the vote, compared with 40.9% for Cepeda.

    The result surprised many analysts. Despite complaints, Petro has maintained approval ratings above 50% and has created a broad coalition of movements that support the left. Cepeda enjoyed a comfortable lead in the polls into last month.

    Yet many voters instead turned to De La Espriella, a political newcomer who promised a clean break not only with the left, but with traditional parties and the “same ones as always.”

    Since the first round, most polls have shown De La Espriella holding the lead. However, analysts note that the right-wing candidate’s increasingly strident language has worried more middle-of-the-road Colombians, making it harder to predict whom undecided voters will support.

    After May’s first round, Petro claimed electoral fraud without evidence, raising concerns that he could refuse to accept the results of Sunday’s election or call for protests.

    When are results expected?

    Polls were open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. local time. Preliminary results were expected within hours of the polls closing.

    This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

  • 2 people died and 2 others were injured after being shot in Philadelphia’s Fairhill section

    2 people died and 2 others were injured after being shot in Philadelphia’s Fairhill section

    A shooting in the wee hours of Sunday left two men dead and two others injured in the Fairhill section of Philadelphia, police said.

    Gunshots prompted police to arrive near 5th and Westmoreland Streets right before 3 a.m.

    Police took one man to Temple University Hospital. He was pronounced dead.

    Two men brought themselves to Temple University Hospital, police said. They are in stable condition.

    A fourth man was taken to St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children, police said. He died soon after.

    So far, no arrests have been made. Police have yet to release the men’s ages and names, or a motive, but the investigation is ongoing with the Homicide Unit.

  • Sheraton Philadelphia Downtown workers went on strike Sunday while FIFA World Cup fans are filling hotels

    Sheraton Philadelphia Downtown workers went on strike Sunday while FIFA World Cup fans are filling hotels

    Unionized hotel workers at Sheraton Philadelphia Downtown went on strike and walked off the job Sunday morning after the union and management failed to come to an agreement.

    The union, Unite Here Local 274, is bargaining for a $30 per hour minimum wage to be established by 2028, as well as improved benefits, including healthcare coverage for workers’ family members.

    The strike comes just one day before France and Iraq compete in a FIFA World Cup soccer match at Lincoln Financial Field (aka “Philadelphia Stadium” for soccer fans) and a few days before another match between Curacao and Ivory Coast. Previous World Cup matches have flooded the city with tourists from around the world.

    “These hotel rooms are selling, and they’re charging exorbitant rates,” said Unite Here Local 274 Vice President Briheem Douglas.

    Priscilla Vasquez bangs a drum as employees at the Sheraton Philadelphia Downtown hotel represented by Unite Here Local 274 picket outside the hotel Sunday morning, June 21, 2026, after they walked off the job demanding $30 per hour wages by 2028, additional healthcare resources, and other benefits that would put them on par with what other hotel workers have recently gotten in new union contracts.

    The prospect of a busy summer tourist season provided the union with leverage to get hotel owners to agree to contracts at five other unionized hotels in the city, Douglas said.

    “Workers have bargained in good faith with this company way before the World Cup started,” Douglas said. “Other hotels have gotten there, and this place hasn’t.”

    Eight unionized hotels in Center City had been without a contract since 2024, Douglas noted. However, within the last year, workers have successfully bargained contracts, locking in the $30 hourly wage and improved benefits, at the Hilton Philadelphia at Penn’s Landing, Wyndham Philadelphia Historic District, Sonesta Philadelphia Rittenhouse Square, Sheraton Philadelphia University City Hotel, and Hampton Inn Philadelphia Center City-Convention Center.

    Douglas noted that the Sheraton Philadelphia Downtown is the biggest unionized hotel in the city, with about 200 Unite Here employees.

    “For our workers to not be at the standard is disrespectful,” Douglas said.

    Douglas said workers face added pressure to secure healthcare after the Trump administration’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” reduced access to Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) benefits.

    Francine Eason, a unionized housekeeper at the Sheraton Philadelphia Downtown, said nearly every union employee at the hotel has children.

    Eason has an adult daughter, a grandchild, and a teenaged niece in her household in Wilmington. But swelling gasoline prices and spiking grocery bills have eaten away at the buying power of her $22 per hour wage over the last year.

    “Everybody is on hard times,” Eason said. With gas prices backing off, she said this weekend was the first time in a while she’d been able to fill the gas tank on her 2017 Kia Optima — she’d been in the habit of only filling it halfway, in case she needed money for food.

    “Oh, my gosh, it was lovely,” Eason said, and recalled musing, “This is a full tank.”

    The union also is seeking a reduction in the number of rooms housekeeping staff are required to prepare per shift for guests, from 16 to 15.

    The hotel is owned by Miami-based CL Hotels and is run by Aimbridge Hospitality.

    In a statement, the Sheraton’s management said: “We respect our team members’ rights to engage in legally protected activities and look forward to reaching a fair contract. While discussions are ongoing, we remain committed to ensuring our guests enjoy their stay.”

    In addition to this summer’s surge of World Cup fans and tourists, Sheraton’s regular business includes flight attendants, said Keturah Johnson, the international vice president for the Association of Flight Attendants, a union.

    Johnson participated in the strike as a show of solidarity with the hotel workers. She said the flight attendants’ union made the decision to have flight attendants stay elsewhere in the city during the strike as a show of support.

    “We don’t cross picket lines,” Johnson said. “We join them.”

    Employees at the Sheraton Philadelphia Downtown hotel represented by Unite Here Local 274 picket outside the hotel Sunday morning, June 21, 2026, after they walked off the job demanding $30 per hour wages by 2028, additional healthcare resources, and other benefits that would put them on par with what other hotel workers have recently gotten in new union contracts.