Tag: Weekend Reads

  • Pennsylvania spent $397 million in overtime last year. Here’s why government workers are logging such long hours

    Pennsylvania spent $397 million in overtime last year. Here’s why government workers are logging such long hours

    Pennsylvania pays out hundreds of millions in overtime pay to its employees annually. For some agencies, overtime work is in the nature of the jobs, which involve responding to emergencies. But understaffing sometimes plays a role as well.

    Last year, Pennsylvania paid $397 million in overtime to roughly 56,000 employees, according to state data. The state plans to spend a similar amount this year.

    “Overtime is a necessary part of operating state government,” Daniel Egan, a spokesperson for the Pennsylvania Office of Administration, said via email in February. “Many Commonwealth agencies provide 24-7 services Pennsylvanians rely on, including plowing roads, responding to emergencies, staffing correctional facilities, and caring for patients in state hospitals and nursing homes.”

    In Pennsylvania, overtime spending has increased by nearly 50% since 2019. Some of the agencies that paid the most overtime were the Department of Corrections, Department of Transportation, Department of Human Services, and the State Police.

    Dolling out millions in overtime is not uncommon in state governments and it’s been increasing among some. New York spent 1.3 billion on overtime in 2024, a roughly 10% increase from the previous year. Maryland spent $404 million that year, up almost 38% from four years prior. In Delaware, overtime spending reached $84 million in 2025, about a 20% increase from 2023.

    While staffing shortages contribute to overtime needs, agencies say a variety of factors contribute to this spending.

    Top spenders on overtime in Pa.

    Overtime accounted for 3.9% of Pennsylvania’s personnel costs in 2025, says Egan, which last year ran up to over $10 billion.

    These costs include salaries, wages, employee benefits, and other personnel costs like overtime.

    window.addEventListener(“message”,function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}});

    Pennsylvania’s personnel costs have grown from $8.2 billion to $10 billion between 2019 and 2025, while overtime spending increased from $269 million to nearly $400 million last year.

    But the state’s other expenses have grown even more. Personnel was 9.4% of the budget in 2019, and dropped to 7.8% last year.

    window.addEventListener(“message”,function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}});

    Egan noted that state employee pay rates have increased by roughly 28% since 2019 “to keep up with the cost of living and ensure the commonwealth remains a competitive employer for high-quality employees,” and overtime is based on employees’ base rate of pay. He also noted that many state agencies must operate “around the clock.”

    Staffing shortages

    Corrections doled out roughly $163 million in overtime to 13,600 employees in 2025.

    “Overtime in corrections will always be a reality due to the 24/7 operation of essential security posts,” but the department has been working to curb its staffing shortages, said spokesperson Maria Bivens.

    State prisons have been plagued by staffing shortages across the country.

    In Pennsylvania, Corrections has looked to address the shortage in recent years by dropping the age requirement for trainees and allowing out-of-state applicants.

    “As corrections officer vacancies decrease, our facilities become safer, more cost-effective, and better equipped to meet the needs of the incarcerated population,” department secretary Laurel Harry said last year.

    Curbing the staffing shortage helps reduce the agency’s reliance on overtime, which in turn reduces employee burnout and saves taxpayers money, the department has noted.

    The officer vacancy rate fell from 11.3% in September 2022 to 6.4% in September 2025. Bivens said vacancy should continue to drop to roughly 3% in March once two facilities close and their staff are deployed to other positions.

    A Pennsylvania State Police vehicle parked in Center City Philadelphia.

    At the Pennsylvania State Police, “overtime is not determined solely by vacancy rates,” said spokesperson Logan Brouse. It can include responding to critical incidents and court appearances, Brouse noted.

    “As part of our public safety operations, overtime is sometimes necessary to uphold our mission by ensuring we can respond efficiently and effectively to emergencies, maintain adequate staffing levels, and meet operational demands,” said Brouse.

    The department paid roughly $55 million in overtime to about 5,700 employees last year.

    Pennsylvania’s State Police is among several police departments across the country that recently cut their college requirement. As of Feb. 19, the agency had 206 trooper vacancies and 110 open civilian positions.

    The governor’s budget proposal includes funds to add 380 troopers, and removes a cap on how many the state can hire, said Brouse.

    “The department continually reviews staffing levels, scheduling practices, and operational needs to manage overtime responsibly,” said Brouse. “We always strive to be good stewards of taxpayer money while ensuring that public safety services are delivered effectively and without interruption.”

    Agencies on call 24-7

    Some agencies say overtime is inevitable given the all-hours nature of their work.

    Last year, PennDot paid $70 million in overtime to roughly 12,100 employees. Their work includes emergency response during weather events, as well as roadway or bridge repairs, noted spokesperson Erin Waters-Trasatt.

    “Pennsylvanians expect our employees to respond to emergencies 24-7 and during major events — like the January 2026 snowstorm,” said Waters-Trasatt. “Overtime is required to keep our roadways clear and safe for travel.”

    PennDot trucks load up on salt at their facility on Hunting Park Avenue on Friday morning Jan. 19, 2024.

    The Department of Human Services paid about $65 million in overtime to 8,513 employees last year.

    The department runs psychiatric hospitals and other residential care facilities that operate 24-7 and “must continue to function even when employees have reached the standard number of work hours per day or week,” said spokesperson Natalie Scott.

    The department has also been trying to fill vacancies, Scott noted, adding that Gov. Josh Shapiro’s administration has cut down the time it takes to hire state employees.

    “Progress made to increase staff will allow employees more time and resources to effectively do their work and reduce the amount of overtime spent,” said Scott.

  • Philly has lots of trails. For the first time, it is hiring a full-time crew to maintain them.

    Philly has lots of trails. For the first time, it is hiring a full-time crew to maintain them.

    Philadelphia’s miles of trails draw a constant stream of runners, walkers, hikers, cyclists, and commuters.

    Yet for years, city officials have depended on residents calling in or logging in to the 311 system to report trail issues before a crew was sent out.

    Now, Philadelphia Parks and Recreation (PPR) is set to roll out the city’s first dedicated trail-maintenance crew, a pilot program funded by a $600,000 grant from the William Penn Foundation.

    The money will fund a six-person team tasked exclusively with monitoring and maintaining multiuse trails that thread through 10 watershed-protecting parks.

    Susan Buck, PPR’s deputy commissioner of operations, said the crew would launch this summer and resolve a long-standing logistical problem.

    “The focus has always been on building the trails,“ Buck said. ”However, in recent years we would go to community meetings and hear more about trail maintenance.”

    Right now, addressing a downed tree or a washed-out path means pulling staff away from recreation centers and neighborhood parks. A dedicated trail crew will ease that strain, she said, and position the city to address issues before they snowball into bigger problems.

    Now, PPR can be proactive, she said.

    Parks are priorities

    The crew’s immediate priority will be to rotate through 10 watershed parks, such as Wissahickon Valley, Pennypack, Tacony Creek, and Cobbs Creek. Crews will also monitor the Schuylkill River Trail, which recently saw major repairs to sinkholes and storm damage.

    Buck said the crew will initially be responsible for about 80 miles of trails.

    The city has 166 miles of trails or more depending on what’s being counted. Overall, PPR manages asphalt, gravel, and dirt trails that residents use not only for recreation but for commuting and walking neighborhood to neighborhood.

    The new crew will have skid-steer loaders, which are small versatile vehicles with mechanized arms and buckets used to clear, dig, grade, and lift. And they’ll have other equipment such as wood chippers and chainsaws.

    For the average park-goer, it should translate to a smoother weekend run, daily commute, or less frustrating bike ride, Buck said.

    “Overall, people will see safer trails and more enjoyable trails,” Buck added. “If you’re a runner or cyclist getting hit by overgrown brush, maybe we’ll be able to get to that faster. Ruts and divots should get filled in faster.”

    By having a mobile team that can move from the Wissahickon to East Fairmount Park, the city aims to create a uniform experience for all users.

    Buck has been working alongside Sarah Clark Stuart, the trails manager for the Streets Department.

    The two are working toward a cost-sharing agreement between the two departments to turn the pilot program into an annual part of the city budget.

    That way the crew can continue to clear overgrown brush, haul away downed trees, fix washouts, tackle soil erosion, eliminate tripping hazards, and clean graffiti off signs.

    The pilot program could use existing employees or result in new hires, she said.

    ‘Great cities have great parks’

    Sara Stevenson, executive director of Friends of the Wissahickon (FOW), said the dedicated crew represents a shift in the way the city has viewed its natural assets. The nonprofit FOW helps manage the city-owned Wissahickon Valley Park.

    The 2,000-acre park has more than 50 miles of paved and dirt trails. The new trail crew will be assigned to help with paved paths and major arteries like Forbidden Drive.

    “It’s a great program,” Stevenson said. “The more we can invest in Parks and Rec, the better our city will be. This is a good step forward and a recognition of how important the trail system is.”

    The Wissahickon relies on thousands of volunteers annually to pull invasive species, clear debris, and help with other maintenance. Stevenson said that the demands of maintaining sustainable trails requires a professional, daily presence.

    “Great cities have great parks,” Stevenson said. “I think what we’ll see is a new standard of care … It’s an illustration that the city understands the value of the trail across the entire city.”

  • The candidates vying to succeed Dwight Evans got a chance to ask each other questions. Things got tense.

    The candidates vying to succeed Dwight Evans got a chance to ask each other questions. Things got tense.

    With a crowded field of Democrats who largely agree on policy issues, it’s been difficult to differentiate the candidates in this year’s race for Philadelphia’s open congressional seat.

    But at a forum Monday night, the top candidates for the 3rd Congressional District, which is being vacated by retiring Democrat Dwight Evans, began to make clear where the battle lines are — by taking shots at one another.

    At the end of the event, the moderator, 21st Ward Leader Lou Agre, allowed the candidates to ask one another questions. Their choices offered hints as to which of their rivals the candidates view as most threatening.

    Dr. Ala Stanford, who appears to be the strongest candidate among the non-elected officials in the race, questioned the accomplishments of State Sen. Sharif Street, who is seen by many as a frontrunner after being endorsed by the Democratic City Committee and building trades unions.

    Street, in turn, fired a question about hate crime legislation at State Rep. Chris Rabb, a progressive who could counter Street’s hold on the Democratic establishment if he consolidates support from left-leaning organizations.

    Lastly, State Rep. Morgan Cephas came after Stanford, prompting a tense exchange about the physician’s government contracts.

    The 3rd District covers about half of Philadelphia and is, by some measures, the bluest seat in Congress. The Democratic primary is May 19.

    The forum was initially scheduled to be held in-person at the Polish Legion of American Veterans’ Adam Kowalski post in Roxborough, but it was moved to Zoom due to the blizzard on Sunday and Monday.

    Here are the issues the candidates debated Monday night.

    Stanford questions Street’s accomplishments

    Stanford, a pediatric surgeon, has been widely celebrated for founding the Black Doctors Consortium to help reach underserved communities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    She began the candidate-on-candidate questioning on Monday by asking Street for instances in which his work has helped constituents in tangible ways, setting up a juxtaposition with her record.

    “In a time when the people are asking for new leadership, they’re asking for innovation, they’re asking for not the same politics as usual … can you tell the people a time when the seas were rough and you stepped up and delivered for them that they felt it?” Stanford asked, adding: “Can you share what you can do during the chaos that people can feel — and where was it during COVID?”

    Physician Ala Stanford (left) and State Sen. Sharif Street at a December forum hosted by the 9th Ward Democratic Committee.

    Street began by saying that, as the top Democrat on the Senate Banking & Insurance Committee in Harrisburg, he boosted Stanford’s work during the pandemic by pressuring insurance companies to reimburse her fledgling organization, which provided testing and vaccinations for thousands of Philadelphians in disadvantaged neighborhoods.

    “Independence Blue Cross was not moving forward with the reimbursement rates for the Black COVID Doctors Consortium,” Street said. “I spoke with you, and I helped, and I reached out to them to make sure that [the Medicaid plan] Keystone First would begin to pay the reimbursement in an immediate way.”

    He also said his office distributed food to constituents and helped process rent rebates during the pandemic.

    In the run-up to the 2020 election, Street, as chair of the Pennsylvania Democratic Party at the time, repeatedly fought in court against President Donald Trump’s campaign over election administration issues. In her question, Stanford asked Street to focus on what he delivered for his constituents — “not that you sued Donald Trump 20 times and won every time, because how do the people feel that?”

    But Street said those legal victories resulted in tangible results, as well.

    “Donald Trump wanted to challenge people’s ability to vote in some of the most vulnerable communities,” he said. “I went to court, I stopped him, and I made sure that they had the right to vote, and that was why we were able to pass the vote to remove him from office.”

    Street and Rabb clash over hate-crime legislation

    When it was his turn to pose a question, Street pressed Rabb on why the progressive was opposed to hate-crime legislation, an issue the two had sparred over at a forum last week.

    “You and I have worked to fight for regular folks, for disadvantaged people, for a long time. I was shocked that you … want to prevent hate-crimes legislation,” Street, a centrist Democrat, said to Rabb. “I’ve heard from so many trans women of color, who are most likely to be victims of hate crimes, and they don’t understand.”

    Rabb responded by saying that Street’s line of attack was “shameful and unnecessary.”

    “I know you want to win. I just thought you would do it with honor,” Rabb said. “I am an active member of the LGBTQ Equality Caucus. I am the father of a queer son. I represent an active queer community. … To use this as a political punching bag is just — man, it’s beneath you.”

    At the end of the forum, Street clarified that he has no doubts about Rabb’s commitment to the LGBTQ community.

    At a December candidates forum in Mount Airy, (from left) State Reps. Morgan Cephas and Chris Rabb and physician David Oxman.

    “I had a policy dispute about hate crimes,” Street said. “I did not mean to question your commitment to the trans community or to your kid.”

    The dust-up got in the way of a meaningful debate over hate-crime laws, which increase sentences for people convicted of crimes that prosecutors prove were motivated by prejudice against particular groups.

    Such laws are common across the country, but they have long faced criticism from the libertarian right, which fears that such regulations could be used to target citizens for political views. The laws have also faced pushback from some on the progressive left, who contend that they contribute to mass incarceration.

    “Politicians tout hate-crime laws as proof they care about the marginalized,” Rabb wrote in an op-ed for PennLive last fall. “In reality, the main outcome is more policing, more prosecution, and more incarceration.”

    Street said last week that people who oppose hate-crime laws on the “far left … don’t want to address the antisemitism on the left or the right.”

    Rabb has been the 3rd District candidate most critical of Israel’s war in Gaza. Street has also been critical of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s handling of the war, but holds a more centrist view on the conflict in the Middle East.

    The Pennsylvania House in 2023 approved a bill to expand the state’s law that criminalizes ethnic intimidation to include sexual orientation and disability status. Rabb voted for the bill, which ultimately died in the Senate amid GOP opposition, but said he had “considerable reservations.”

    “We should collectively focus on structural violence and hatred that has been cultivated by the very institutions that have been asked to address this legislation,” Rabb said at the time.

    Cephas presses Stanford about her government contracts

    Cephas, who represents a West Philadelphia district and chairs the Philadelphia delegation to the state House, questioned how much money Stanford’s nonprofit organization has made from government contracting since the onset of the pandemic.

    “You oftentimes quote that you, as a private citizen, came in and saved Philadelphia from COVID, and, you know, there are a number of people on this [Zoom] call that stepped up during COVID,” Cephas said, noting that she worked with Stanford to set up clinics in her district during the pandemic.

    “We all did it in our own individual capacity, and we didn’t receive government contracts for it. … How much in government contracts did you receive during the COVID-19 period?”

    Stanford noted that she initially launched the Black Doctors Consortium with her own financial resources to serve neighborhoods that were not being reached by existing healthcare and government institutions. She said her first $1 million city grant for testing came months after she began her work.

    In 2020 and 2021, Stanford’s groups received $2.5 million in grants and contracts from the city, state, and federal governments, according to Stanford campaign manager Janée Taft-Mack. That money covered costs including supplies, staff, mobile medical units, personal protective equipment, and facility rentals, Taft-Mack said.

    Since then, Stanford has continued partnering with government agencies to address healthcare inequality. She has opened the Dr. Ala Stanford Center for Health Equity in Swampoodle and secured a $5.38 million contract for the Black Doctors Consortium to work at Riverview Wellness Village, the city-owned drug recovery home.

    The total amount Stanford and her organizations have received for work since 2021 was not immediately clear.

    Cheesesteaks, of course

    Dr. David Oxman, an intensive care physician at Jefferson University Hospital who lives in South Philadelphia, closed the open question session by asking his fellow candidates what cheese they order on their cheesesteaks.

    Philly’s most famous culinary offering has proven politically hazardous over the years, such as when John Kerry catastrophically asked for Swiss cheese while visiting Pat’s King of Steaks during the 2004 presidential election.

    This year’s congressional hopefuls were better prepared than the Massachusetts senator.

    Agre, the moderator whose ward includes much of Roxborough, interjected to insist that Dalessandro’s served up the best steak sandwiches in the city.

    At a candidate’s forum on Feb. 9 at the Church of the Holy Trinity, (left to right) Alex Schnell, physician Dave Oxman, State Sen. Sharif Street, physician Ala Stanford, State Rep. Morgan Cephas, and Pablo McConnie-Saad.

    Cephas said she orders Cooper Sharp at Angelo’s Pizzeria. Stanford’s go-to is American from Dalessandro’s. Street, a vegetarian, said he gets non-meat cheesesteaks from Hip City Veg and enjoys the cheese they use. (Mozzarella, per Hip City’s website.)

    And Rabb shouted out the cheesesteak egg rolls from Black Dragon, a West Philadelphia establishment offering a “unique fusion of Black American cuisine presented with the familiar aesthetics of classic Chinese American takeout,” according to its website.

    Still tense from the previous questions and perhaps a bit peckish, the candidates declined Agre’s offer to deliver closing remarks.

    Staff writers Max Marin and Ryan W. Briggs contributed to this article.

  • A deteriorating West Goshen house is at the center of a preservation fight

    A deteriorating West Goshen house is at the center of a preservation fight

    Posts online beckoned urban explorers to creep through a century-old West Goshen home that has sat empty and deteriorating for more than two decades. Police have frequented the property — responding to sounds of gunshots, or finding the doors open, but halting their searches, worried the floor might collapse.

    The once-impressive three-story fieldstone house, with its private bridge and stonemason barn, has become something of an “attractive nuisance,” as a court document says, and a safety threat as it deteriorates.

    After the township intervened, the future of the privately owned property at 905 Westtown Rd. is now in the hands of a judge, who will weigh whether the property can be restored or if it ought to be demolished.

    But a group of residents fear losing the house, even in its much-diminished state, and have launched an effort to save the property. The hope is to halt possible development and instead turn it into a heritage center that would educate visitors on Chester County’s Quaker history and its roots to the Underground Railroad.

    It’s one example of a broader push and pull in Chester County, where residents want to preserve open space and history, and hold off development. But with privately owned land, especially land that is not protected for being historic, municipal officials can only do so much.

    “It’s a beautiful place. When you spend some time there, it’s like a window through time,” said Stephen Lyons, who is leading the preservation group Save Forsythe Farm, an unofficial name for the property derived from John Forsythe, who lived from 1754 to 1840, eventually owning the land and helping establish Westtown School.

    “It has a spirit of beauty,” he said.

    After sitting vacant for 20 years, the house has rotted from the inside

    The home was built more than a century ago — a structural engineer’s report puts it at 1900, a datestone on the property indicates 1818, and others suggest it may be older.

    The property, purchased by Joseph Kravitz in 2003, has descended into disrepair in the last two decades. Kravitz was found to have violated property maintenance codes in recent years. The property went into foreclosure and was listed for sheriff’s sale several times.

    But in September, with the property still owned by Kravitz, West Goshen officials submitted a 350-page petition to Chester County Court seeking conservatorship, arguing the house was neglected and in need of substantial rehabilitation.

    A judge approved the petition in November and appointed BDP Impact Real Estate as the conservator, which was tasked with creating a plan for abatement. Its final report will be heard in court on March 16, and the judge will determine what path should be followed. To retain ownership, Kravitz can reimburse the conservator and pay a fee, township officials said.

    Kravitz did not respond to phone calls or an email seeking comment.

    Under the conservatorship, a fence was placed to fend off explorers, and a structural engineer was brought in to assess the structures on the property. The engineer would not go beyond the front door of the house, out of fear of falling through the floor.

    But without going inside, the engineer found significant interior deterioration from a leaking roof, according to the report. Plaster, which once covered the ceilings, had rotted, fallen, and created mounds on the floor, revealing the skeletal wooden beams. The gutters have been disconnected, with water saturating the soil near the foundation. Cracks were seen on some windows.

    An in-ground swimming pool had “substantial” algae growth. A pool equipment shed was distorted. And a masonry barn structure was “in a state of impending collapse.”

    A single-lane bridge, allowing access from Westtown Road across a creek, is “not suitable for permanent use without repair or reconstruction.”

    When township solicitor Carl Ewald visited the property with the structural engineer in November, he mistook the swimming pool for a murky patch of grass.

    “It’s a very unfortunate situation, because I was able to find online pictures of this property from 20-some years ago, when it last went up for sale, and it was a really nice property back then,” he said.

    Along with an estimated $171,730 to install a temporary bridge to ferry equipment to the property, it would cost roughly $121,600 to demolish the main house, the conservator estimated.

    The estimated cost of rehabilitation was much higher: $1.2 million. Under that plan, the masonry walls would have to be stabilized and retained, and the interior fully gutted.

    It is unclear whether that is feasible and where the money would come from, Ewald said.

    “The court will be looking at that and determining whether that’s something that could be done, or whether demolition is the only real option,” he said.

    He thinks people might not realize how far gone the property is.

    “It’s unbelievable how fast water penetration into a structure really damages it, and how a house like this that stood for many years and, in 20 years, was really reduced to a shell,” Ewald said.

    The ability to ‘synthesize all these histories’

    With such a difficult path ahead, why not let the property go?

    For residents, it represents the region’s deep historical ties, and it offers the potential for preserving open space.

    Lyons grew up one mile away from the area. After living in New York as a musician and actor, he returned during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic to care for his parents, and Lyons became immersed in learning about the history of West Goshen, and the abolitionist and Quaker histories entrenched in the community.

    The goal for Save Forsythe Farm would be to create an open space that connects to the nearby Barker Park. In the group’s vision, the home would become a historic site that teaches about abolition, Black history, civil rights history, Quaker history, and more.

    “Forsythe Farm has a tremendous potential to synthesize all these histories and our connection to land and also First Nations people as well,” Lyons said.

    But this experience has prompted a proposed ordinance to address how demolition by neglect is handled amid private property rights, which the township’s board of supervisors and historic commission are set to discuss Thursday.

    Still, the hope is to keep the house from being demolished, said Brittany Schugsta, vice chair of the Save Forsythe Farm group. Her family once tried to buy the property, but ended up in East Goshen.

    “When I lived in West Goshen … it felt much more convenient. There was all the shopping hubs and all of those kind of places around, but it lacked that richness of history,” she said.

    If the owner does not reimburse the conservator, the property would be sold by the court to the highest bidder, Ewald said. The money would pay off the liens, debts, and the conservatorship. Any money left over would go to Kravitz.

    The township could buy the property, if officials are willing to spend a couple of million dollars “at minimum,” Ewald said. But it is not yet clear how much the property would cost, or if officials would want to purchase it.

    The house is something of a symbol of the past, said Bill Aaronson. He can see 905 Westtown from his front porch on Bob-O-Link Lane, where he has lived since the 1980s. He watched the home sell. He didn’t think much about it, until his son took a stroll and saw how much it had declined.

    And then he heard what it could become: a development.

    Speaking at a historical commission meeting last year, Kravitz said he envisioned several draftsman-style houses, called “Forsythe’s Homes” or “Barkerville.”

    (Though Kravitz has discussed his intentions previously, township officials said no plans had been submitted or were under review.)

    The concept prompted Aaronson to become more involved with Save Forsythe Farm.

    “The house itself is an extraordinary presence, and it symbolizes what the history here was, more than a plaque ever would,” Aaronson said.

  • FDA is removing the ‘black box’ warning on hormone treatments for women in menopause. Here’s what you need to know.

    FDA is removing the ‘black box’ warning on hormone treatments for women in menopause. Here’s what you need to know.

    For years, Cathleen “Cat” Brown, a Philadelphia obstetrician and gynecologist, would listen to patients complaining of hot flashes, brain fog, and painful sex and prescribe estrogen as a safe option for easing their menopausal symptoms.

    But when the women read the drug label and pharmacy package insert, they’d recoil at a “black box” warning, Brown said. The bold, black-bordered alert warned women that estrogen may put them at higher risk of breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, stroke, and dementia.

    “It was making liars out of doctors,” Brown said. “It frankly scared the crap out of patients, and it really caused distrust between the patients and the providers.”

    A black box warning is the highest safety alert that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration requires drug manufacturers to include on medications in which clinical data shows the drug can cause death or serious health risks.

    But the warning label placed on all estrogen-based treatments since 2003 was based on an outdated and flawed government-funded study, known as the Women’s Health Initiative.

    Newer scientific research shows that the benefits of hormone replacement therapy, or HRT, far outweigh the risks for most women, experts say, particularly those who are younger than 60 or within 10 years of menopause.

    More recent evidence also suggests that estrogen can reduce the risk of breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer’s, bone fractures, and cognitive decline, extending women’s lives by about 10 years.

    In November, FDA Commissioner Martin Makary announced that the agency was taking steps to remove the black box warning on hormone treatments for women.

    “We are going to stop the fear machine steering women away from this life-changing, even life-saving treatment,” Makary said at a news conference.

    Brown, an ob-gyn at Jefferson Abington Hospital, said the FDA’s reversal will lead to more medical schools teaching doctors how to treat menopause and provide women with more access to hormone therapies.

    “It’s causing kind of a tidal wave in the medical community,” Brown said. “It was a relief to see the FDA catching up with the science.”

    The Inquirer spoke with Brown, who also serves as the medical director for a national menopause telehealth provider called Winona, about the FDA’s shift on HRT and what that means for aging women. This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

    What prompted the FDA warning on estrogen treatments?

    The black box warning was one of the aftereffects of the whole Women’s Health Initiative study released in 2002. They basically published the results before they really had a chance to have it peer-reviewed and really analyze the data, and it went all over the news, and suddenly there was this widespread panic. Doctors across America got scared. Patients got scared, and everyone was taken off their HRT.

    Why was the 2002 study misleading?

    In that study, they were giving HRT to much older women, like in their late 60s, who weren’t great candidates to start it. They were also using different forms of HRT than we’re using now, so a lot of more synthetic hormones. The most popular one back then was Premarin, which came from a pregnant mare’s urine, so horse estrogens.

    We were also giving these women higher doses of hormones, and it was causing more medical problems.

    What has changed since?

    Now we really lean toward giving you bioidentical hormones, like the same compounds that your ovaries were making on their own. It’s much safer. Our body processes it better, and we’re able to use lower doses to have the same effectiveness than those old synthetic hormones that they had to do at higher doses before. We also learned from that study that there’s a magic window — the safest time to initiate hormone replacement therapy is within 10 years of a woman going through menopause.

    What led to the FDA’s reversal?

    So the FDA held an expert panel last July. They invited all these experts on hormone therapy to speak and basically give their justification for why that black box warning needs to be removed. It’s really been a disservice to women, because all the women who were taken off HRT ended up with bad osteoporosis, weak bones, and more medical problems from the loss of estrogen from their bodies.

    They also talked about the fact that we should not have this black box warning on estrogen products, especially estrogen vaginal cream, which is so safe that it really could be over the counter. For women in nursing homes, a little bit of vaginal estrogen could have prevented recurrent urinary tract infections. So many women die of urinary sepsis and bacteremia that has come from a UTI. Topical vaginal products also significantly improve sex life for women.

    What is HRT?

    We’re actually starting to call it hormone therapy, because we’re not trying to replace your levels back to what you were making on your own in your 20s or 30s. It’s about giving you enough dosage of hormone to give you the health benefits and mitigate bothersome symptoms and help women with that menopausal transition.

    When we are aging, within our 40s and into our 50s, we lose estrogen at a dramatic rate. We also have testosterone in our bodies as women and that drops, too. That fluctuation of hormones causes this whole litany of symptoms, like hot flashes, night sweats, brain fog, joint pain, dry skin, brittle hair, hair loss, so many things.

    Estrogen is a powerhouse hormone that keeps all the tissues in our body healthy.

    Why is this a win for women’s health?

    More women are demanding better and not wanting to go gently into old age and suffer anymore. This is also pushing more medical education institutions to start infusing menopause into the curriculum. Women’s health has never been in the forefront.

    It’s always been something we do secretly and quietly, which I think is kind of a parallel to the gender disparities in the world, like once we’re done childbearing and we’re no longer in our fertile peak, it’s like we’re less important to the world, and nobody wants to focus on it. This is causing a trend where more women are going to get educated and more doctors are going to start learning.

  • Towed by the PPA, frustrated with SEPTA, he took an electric scooter onto Lincoln Drive

    Towed by the PPA, frustrated with SEPTA, he took an electric scooter onto Lincoln Drive

    Saladine Sherrod was in a jam. The 34-year-old handyman from North Philly needed to get to a job in Roxborough, but he didn’t have a car. He says the PPA had towed it the night before. “I was on top of the snow,” Sherrod said. “There weren’t any lines of demarcation.”

    And speaking of the winter storm, it was still wreaking havoc on SEPTA. “It was detour after detour after detour,” Sherrod said about the bus routes that day. It had been two weeks since it snowed, but cold weather had kept the city encased in snow and ice, and a brutal wind chill had plunged temperatures to historic lows. Sherrod said bus operators were unavailable as a result. “Employees were calling off because of the weather or some craziness like that.”

    He would have to take three buses to get to his job and three more to get home. That would cost almost $18. He only had $40 to get through the rest of the week, and several more jobs lined up. Plus, “with the way the weather was,” he said, “I’d be sitting outside for hours.”

    So Sherrod came up with a different plan. He found a shop that would finance an electric scooter for $40 down and set off toward Roxborough, following the “via bike” route on Google Maps. Having moved to Philadelphia from the Bronx in 2022, Sherrod still wasn’t all that familiar with the city. He knew his part of town, near Broad and Logan, but Germantown was a mystery. Still, he zipped along its side streets on his newly purchased Yaddea Elite Prime without much concern for his safety.

    Saladine Sherrod, 34, of North Philadelphia, Pa., poses for a photo with his electric scooter in Philadelphia, Pa., on Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2026.

    It wasn’t until Google Maps ushered him out of the neighborhood and pointed him toward a busy intersection in a dense, wooded area that his anxiety spiked. He could see he was meant to reach a bike path dotting the four-lane road he was about to turn onto, but it was closed because of the snow. He had no choice but to take the “via car” route. As he turned, the road narrowed. Vehicles flew past him. Unbeknown to Sherrod, he was now on one of Philadelphia’s most dangerous streets: Lincoln Drive.

    Car accidents occur almost every day on Lincoln Drive, a treacherous, shoulderless state road that winds along the perimeter of Wissahickon Valley Park. Drivers regularly take its hairpin curves at nearly twice the posted speed limit of 25 mph. Since 2019, five people have died driving on it. Fed-up residents who live nearby have long pushed for additional safety measures. In September 2023, the city’s Streets Department added speed tables along one of the most dangerous stretches to force drivers to slow down.

    But that mid-February afternoon, they still appeared to be speeding to Sherrod. “It looked like a NASCAR rally,” he said. Sherrod had never driven on Lincoln Drive, but he immediately sensed he was in a precarious situation. He maneuvered as far to the right as he could and focused on the snaking road ahead. He tried to ignore how cold he was. “My hands were numb,” he said. “My legs were dead. If I moved them, it felt like a bunch of needles were poking me.”

    He wasn’t wearing a helmet. He was scared, he said, but he had a job to get to. “It was one of those scares that, because you have the responsibility, it’s almost OK,” Sherrod said. “Like, ‘I heard that there are alligators in this lake, but I’ve got to get to the other side.’”

    What Sherrod saw as commitment, though, others saw as recklessness. He remembers one driver shouting at him “out of concern.” Sherrod let them know he was OK with a nod, and they drove off. But unbeknown to Sherrod, the driver had filmed him and uploaded the video to Instagram. “WHO MANS IS THIS??? Only in Philly electric scooter seen driving on Lincoln Drive,” the caption read.

    The clip was already pinballing across local feeds when Sherrod finally escaped Lincoln Drive via Henry Avenue and arrived at work. A few hours later, he finished building furniture for his customer, and they paid for an Uber so he would not have to ride the scooter home in the freezing cold. By then, the video had spread across Philly.

    Still, it would take a few days to reach Sherrod. He only saw it when a friend reached out to show it to him, wanting to know what happened to his car. Sherrod was stunned. But the commenters seemed to understand his circumstances. “That’s probably his only transportation to work,” read a typical comment. “He not tryna get fired cuz SEPTA on bulls—,” read another.

    Sherrod seized the moment and reposted the clip. In follow-up videos, he criticized the PPA and SEPTA and hawked T-shirts he made to commemorate his ride.

    He’s only made $50 so far, but it’s not his only income stream. In addition to his handyman work, he recently picked up a part-time job as a cashier at the Dollar Store. He hopes to be back behind the wheel soon. For now, he is still riding the scooter to work. “It’s all working itself out,” Sherrod said. “Slowly, but surely.”

  • Philly school officials want to close Lankenau High and give it to the city. A 1970s legal agreement may snarl that deal.

    Philly school officials want to close Lankenau High and give it to the city. A 1970s legal agreement may snarl that deal.

    Could a 1973 legal agreement help save Lankenau High?

    The Schuylkill Center for Environmental Education hopes so.

    The Philadelphia School District has proposed closing Lankenau, the city’s environmental science magnet school, and giving it to the city to help further Mayor Cherelle L. Parker’s affordable-housing goals, or for job creation.

    But the Schuylkill Center, Lankenau’s neighbor, believes it’s prohibited from doing so, and just notified Superintendent Tony B. Watlington Sr.

    The Schuylkill Center “holds a right to repurchase the property in the event that it is transferred or conveyed or used for any purpose other than school purposes, pursuant to a restriction in the October 4, 1973 deed by which [the Schuylkill Center] conveyed the property to the Lankenau School,” a lawyer for the environmental center wrote in a letter sent to the district Monday.

    Students, staff, and community members who support Lankenau High School – including some dressed as trees – packed a recent community meeting at the school about its proposed closure.

    If the district is “considering a sale of the property or using the property for any purposes other than continued use as a school, this letter serves as written notice of [the Schuylkill Center’s] right to repurchase,” lawyer Sean T. O’Neill wrote to Watlington, “The school district must provide [the Schuylkill Center] with reasonable advance notice of any potential conveyance or change in use and allow [the Schuylkill Center] the opportunity to exercise its right to repurchase.”

    The center, which touts itself as “one of the first urban environmental education centers in the country,” was founded in 1965. It has trails and a visitors’ center and runs educational programs and a wildlife clinic.

    District officials had no immediate comment.

    Lankenau’s history

    Lankenau sits amid 400 wooded acres adjacent to the Schuylkill Center. The 17-acre parcel Lankenau High now sits on was originally the site of the private Lankenau School for Girls; after that school closed, the Philadelphia School District purchased the land.

    What is now Lankenau High was first a program of Saul High and then Germantown High, but in 2005, it became a standalone school as part of then-CEO Paul Vallas’ small schools initiative.

    Since then, Lankenau has soared as a diverse, hands-on magnet with a 100% graduation rate in a location like no other.

    News that Lankenau landed on the district’s closure list infuriated students, parents, community members, and elected officials, who have mounted a robust campaign to fight plans to shut the school and relocate it as an honors program inside Roxborough High.

    Teachers, students, and community members from Lankenau High School rally outside a Philadelphia school board meeting in January.

    They’re particularly alarmed that Lankenau’s small size, used to justify its closing, came as enrollment shrank after the school system ordered changes to its special-admissions policy.

    The Schuylkill Center’s first priority is for Lankenau to remain as it is, said Erin Mooney, executive director of the 60-year-old organization, which now partners closely with Lankenau.

    “We are in opposition to Lankenau’s closing,” said Mooney, “but should something change with Lankenau, we want to ensure that the site continues to be used to teach people about nature.”

    Mooney, who has been public in the Schuylkill Center’s support for the school, discovered the language giving the Schuylkill Center right of first refusal if the property ever ceases being a school in the 1973 agreement.

    Watlington is scheduled to present his sweeping facilities plan — which as of January included 20 closures, six co-locations and 159 modernizations — at a school board meeting Thursday.

    The Lankenau Environmental Science Magnet High School in Roxborough on Saturday, January 24, 2026.

    But the superintendent has said what he presents to the board may include some tweaks to his initial recommendations.

    Mooney hopes the information the Schuylkill’s lawyers sent Monday helps Lankenau come off the closing list.

    “We want Lankenau to stay,” she said, “and I wanted the school board to have this information as part of its decision-making.”

    Watlington’s recommendations are just that; the school board has ultimate say. It has not given a date for the final vote on school closings, but said no vote will happen Thursday.

  • Students would transition from this closing North Philly school to worse-performing ones in the district’s plan

    Students would transition from this closing North Philly school to worse-performing ones in the district’s plan

    Philadelphia School District officials said they considered poverty rates and prior school closings in a neighborhood when weighing which schools to close.

    Each school had a score based on its surrounding neighborhood, and only one of 20 proposed closures is in a “very high risk” neighborhood: John Welsh Elementary.

    Welsh, on the northern edge of the Norris Square neighborhood, has 185 K-8 students and operates at under a quarter of the building’s capacity. Enrollment has declined over the past several years and the school now holds an average of 20 students per grade, including only 9 second graders. About two-thirds of the students are Latino, and the other third are Black.

    While it’s small and its building is not in good shape, it was not necessarily obvious that the district would target Welsh for closure — because so-called neighborhood vulnerability was a factor in officials’ decision-making.

    But Welsh parents and students argue the school shouldn’t be closed because its students were performing well, despite the lack of investment from the district, as well as the condition of the building and its surrounding neighborhood.

    Kareemia Boyd, the parent of a Welsh eighth grader, credited the school with helping her son turn around his grades after he came from a charter school. She transitioned her son to Welsh in fifth grade, when his grades were suffering and he experienced bullying. Now poised to graduate this year, she said he gets A’s and B’s.

    “I didn’t expect he would actually grow in so many ways,” she said at a recent community meeting about the closure plan.

    The district’s draft plan calls for the Welsh building to be upgraded and converted into a new year-round high school which would open for the 2029-30 school year.

    Pedestrians walk along Susquehanna Avenue in the Norris Square neighborhood in 2022.

    Current Welsh students would transition to John F. Hartranft School or William McKinley School. Hartranft and McKinley would receive new ADA investments and other renovations, Algebra I instruction, and pre-K programming, officials said.

    Several students asked district officials at the community meeting why they would be transitioned to Hartranft and McKinley, when those schools have performed worse academically than Welsh. About 14% of students at Hartranft and 10% of students at McKinley scored at least a proficient level on state English language arts exams last year, compared to 20% of Welsh students.

    District representatives said they did not consider academic performance when deciding whether to close schools. Instead they focused on getting proper resources to students and schools, they said, which will be more feasible once schools are consolidated.

    Boyd said her son’s teachers at Welsh pushed him to improve, and wouldn’t let him settle for less than what he was capable of. She appreciated how much they cared about him, and said they had “a big impact.”

    “I want somebody to care about my kid as much as I do,” she said.

    She said she believes the declining enrollment has to do with the school’s neighborhood. Boyd said people are concerned about crime and drugs, and don’t feel safe sending their kids to the school, particularly when school security is limited.

    But for those who have stayed, Sary Rodriguez, a parent of current Welsh fifth and eighth graders, said it’s a community where everyone looks out for others.

    “We all know each other. We all support each other. So it’s hurting a lot of people,” she said about the district’s plan.

    Young people enjoy Norris Square Park in the Norris Square neighborhood, where Welsh Elementary School is slated to close under a proposal from the school district.

    Rodriguez also has a 19-year-old daughter who graduated from Welsh and works at the school. But Rodriguez said she’s considering moving her children to charter schools if the school closes, in part because of her concerns for the academics at McKinley and Hartranft. No matter where they go, transitions are difficult for all involved, she said, including parents.

    “It’s not only the students that have to meet new people and new friends and new teachers, their parents have to start all over [with] a new relationship with teachers and students, the neighborhood … I don’t know nothing about those schools,” she said.

    Rodriguez implored the district officials at the community meeting to genuinely consider pleas to keep the school open.

    “I really have the feeling it doesn’t matter what we say or what we do. It’s just going to be a decision that they’re gonna make,” she said.

    Rodriguez said she’s upset that the district hasn’t invested in Welsh, but plans to put resources into a new school at the same location.

    “It bothers me that they’re going to spend the money to fix it for a high school and they can’t fix it for our kids,” she said.

    Ava Huertas, a sixth grader at Welsh, planned to graduate from the school just like her grandmother, mother, and sister did. She’s been enrolled there since she was in kindergarten, and now would have to move to a new school for eighth grade before transitioning again for high school.

    She asked several questions to district officials about why they were planning to close her school, reading off notecards and avoiding eye contact. As she wrapped up her final question, she thanked the officials for listening, but had to be honest about her feelings.

    “I hope that the plan doesn’t go through, I’m not gonna lie,” she said.

  • Pennsylvania leaders want to avoid another lengthy state budget impasse. But with a $4.3 billion budget shortfall on the horizon, can they?

    Pennsylvania leaders want to avoid another lengthy state budget impasse. But with a $4.3 billion budget shortfall on the horizon, can they?

    HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania’s top leaders want to avoid another ugly, monthslong budget standoff, showing resolve this year to begin negotiations much sooner in hopes of approving a spending deal by their June 30 deadline.

    But that doesn’t change the state’s financial predicaments: Pennsylvania is again on track to spend more than it brings in this fiscal year. Gov. Josh Shapiro has pitched spending at least $4.3 billion more than the state is projected to raise in revenue next fiscal year, part of his $53.2 billion budget proposal.

    Shapiro, who is up for reelection this year and is a rumored 2028 presidential contender, has struggled in budget negotiations since taking office to deliver on his national image as a moderate Democrat willing to work across the aisle while leading the state with a GOP-controlled Senate and narrow Democratic House majority.

    And after last year — when lawmakers couldn’t agree on a state budget deal for months, leading to a bitter impasse and negotiations stretching into November while schools and counties went unfunded — the governor is trying a new strategy.

    Shortly after unveiling his budget proposal to lawmakers last month, Shapiro called top legislative leaders in for a meeting in his office to discuss their spending priorities. Last year, the initial negotiation conversation took place just before the June budget deadline, taking months to arrive at an agreement. House Majority Leader Matt Bradford (D., Montgomery), Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman (R., Indiana), House Minority Leader Jesse Topper (R., Bedford), and Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa (D., Allegheny) accepted Shapiro’s invitation.

    Rosie Lapowsky, a spokesperson for Shapiro, said in a statement that the early conversation was intended to “ensure they remain timely, constructive, and focused on results.”

    A $4.3 billion budget shortfall — and disagreement over how to fix it

    Both Pittman and Bradford, who control their chambers and are top architects to any final budget deal in closed-door negotiations with Shapiro, said the first talks were a good first step in opening negotiations much sooner than last year. But they acknowledged the tough fiscal realities facing the state, and disagreed on how to address them.

    “It just simply spends too much money. We can’t continue the spending trajectory,” Pittman said of Shapiro’s $53.2 billion budget proposal. “It’s only going to cause us to have conversations, as the Independent Fiscal Office pointed out about massive, broad-base tax increases.”

    The Independent Fiscal Office was created by the state legislature in 2010 and is required to produce revenue projections for current and future years. An IFO report this month found that the budget deficit could top $6 billion this year, and hit $8 billion by 2028-29, likely requiring broad tax increases to fill the gap.

    “Assuming he’s reelected, if he’s reelected, I can’t imagine he’s going to be wanting to deal with budgets in 2027 and 2028 that are going to have to call for broad-based tax increases,” added Pittman, who has endorsed Shapiro’s likely GOP gubernatorial challenger, State Treasurer Stacy Garrity.

    State Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman (R., Indiana) during a Feb. 3 news conference at the Capitol in Harrisburg.

    Meanwhile, Bradford, a Democrat, believes the state should focus on the long game in addressing Pennsylvania’s budget shortfall, citing the state’s efforts to recruit new businesses and pass tax cuts to encourage economic growth, as well as Shapiro’s renewed push to create new revenue streams like the taxation and regulation of recreational marijuana and the slot-machine look-alikes know as skill games.

    Pennsylvania’s declining population has “put a lot of stress on our budget books,” Bradford said.

    “The best thing we can do is continue to grow this economy,” Bradford added.

    State Rep. Matt Bradford (D., Montgomery County) during a Feb. 3 news conference at the Capitol in Harrisburg.

    Even without increasing its spending over the 2025-26 fiscal year — an impossible feat due to growing Medicaid obligations — Pennsylvania would still be poised to spend $1.2 billion more than it is expected to bring in next fiscal year.

    To avoid raising taxes this year, leaders will need to raise new revenues and tap into its more than $7 billion in reserves. Republican leaders want to avoid tapping into the state’s Rainy Day Fund until an emergency arises, citing the state’s lackluster revenue projections in future years. However, it’s unclear what government programs or agencies they’d like to cut.

    Just as he did last year to no avail, Shapiro this month again proposed regulating and taxing recreational marijuana and skill games as a way to help fill the state’s budget shortfall. This time, however, his projections on how much revenue could be made has increased dramatically since last year, without changing much of the scope of the proposals.

    For example, last year he pitched a 20% tax on the sale of legal marijuana that he estimated would bring in $535.6 million in its first year. This year, he projected the same idea, but instead projected a marijuana tax would bring in $729.4 million in its initial year — a 36% increase. A Shapiro administration official said earlier this month that the projected increase is due to more interest from marijuana companies that want to do business in Pennsylvania.

    Gov. Josh Shapiro makes his annual budget proposal in the state House chamber on Feb. 3. House Speaker Joanna McClinton is seated behind him.

    State revenues are $362 million higher than expected so far this fiscal year, according to the IFO, offering some hope that the state may continue to grow its economy to fill some of the budget hole.

    Lapowsky, Shapiro’s spokesperson, said in a statement that Shapiro’s budget pitch shows “that government can be a force for good in people’s lives when leaders come together and put Pennsylvanians first.”

    Election year optimism and a preview of the fights to come

    Legislators on the powerful Senate and House appropriations committees, led by House Appropriations Chair Jordan Harris (D., Philadelphia) and Senate Appropriations Chair Scott Martin (R., Lancaster) will individually begin analyzing Shapiro’s budget proposal line-by-line in public hearings this week. Both committees were scheduled to begin their budget hearings on Monday, but were rescheduled to begin on Tuesday afternoon and Wednesday morning for the Senate and House, respectively, due to a snowstorm that blanketed the Philadelphia area.

    The weekslong series of hearings examine the budget needs for each state government agency and row office, as well as the spending from the previous year. Secretaries and elected officials from each office come before the committee to answer questions about their proposed spending.

    State Reps. Johanny Cepeda-Freyitz (left), a Berks County Democrat, and Carol Kazeem (D., Delaware) in the state House chamber Feb. 3 during Gov. Josh Shapiro’s annual budget proposal.

    Pittman said Senate Republicans are likely to zero in on Shapiro’s $1 billion proposed bonding initiative for a range of infrastructure projects relating to energy, housing, local governments, and schools that he largely billed as “a major investment in building new housing.” They’ll also likely question why the Department of Corrections is seeking a $150 million funding increase, after the closure of two state prisons last year.

    GOP members of the Senate committee will also likely question top officials in the Pennsylvania State Police and the Department of General Services over spending for security upgrades at Shapiro’s personal residence following an arson attack last year on the governor’s mansion in Harrisburg, and a mail vendor’s failure to deliver a month’s worth of state mail to residents.

    The state House chamber as Gov. Josh Shapiro makes his annual budget proposal Feb. 3 in Harrisburg.

    House Democrats, meanwhile, are likely to bring attention to the successes of the Working Pennsylvanians Tax Credit and additional increases to public education under the state’s new adequacy formula, Bradford said.

    “We’ve got real accomplishments and a real opportunity to prioritize funding education, affordability, and build on what we’ve done,” Bradford said.

    Unlike the last round of budget negotiations, mass transit funding for SEPTA and other transit agencies is unlikely to be a roadblock this year, as lawmakers have until next year to find a long-term funding solution.

    Despite the inevitable disagreements ahead, there is some cause for optimism heading into another year of Pennsylvania state budget negotiations: Midterm election years often produce much less contentious budget battles, as lawmakers are motivated to reach an agreement and bring home their accomplishments to their districts as they campaign for reelection in November.

    Both Bradford and Pittman expressed hope that the election year may bring an increased willingness among all parties to finish an on-time budget.

    But, “divided government creates all kinds of twists and turns,” Pittman added. “I certainly can’t predict what’s coming ahead here.”

  • Temple’s new provost has an academic background in urban planning and comes from Arizona State University

    Temple’s new provost has an academic background in urban planning and comes from Arizona State University

    An Arizona State University vice provost and dean, who has degrees in mathematics and geography and has studied urban planning, will become Temple University’s next senior vice president and provost.

    Elizabeth “Libby” A. Wentz, 62, an Ohio native with a doctorate from Pennsylvania State University, will step into her new role at Temple July 1, subject to approval by the board of trustees, the school announced Monday.

    “My background in urban planning has kind of shaped who I am and shaped my thinking, and I just think that there’s so many great opportunities for recruiting students, for creating internships for students, for creating research experiences for students in an urban environment that the university’s rural counterparts don’t have in the same way,” Wentz said in an interview.

    Wentz has overseen Arizona State’s Graduate College since 2020 and previously was dean of social sciences, which included geography and urban planning. She will replace David Boardman, who has been Temple’s interim provost since July when Gregory Mandel left the job. Boardman was not a candidate for the job and will continue his role as dean of the college of media and communication.

    As Temple’s provost — essentially the university’s number two leader — she will oversee 17 schools and colleges, multiple campuses, and the school’s undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.

    She is the first provost in at least more than a decade to come from outside the university and was selected through a national search, chaired by a faculty member and a dean.

    “Libby sort of stuck out for me after the hour I spent with her as being literally right on the same page relative to her ability to articulate the mission and the purpose of Temple and why that was so important,” Temple president John Fry said in an interview.

    He was struck by her commitment to student success, he said. “She obviously had time to interact with students and, I think took like really special care and interest in our students,” he said.

    And, Arizona State has grown tremendously in part because of its commitment to online programs, he said, which are a priority in Temple’s strategic plan. Temple has lost about a quarter of its enrollment over the last decade.

    “We don’t have the kind of online enrollment that you would expect a place like Temple to have,” Fry said. “One of the things Libby and I did speak about was her familiarity with the ASU online infrastructure. She’s taught in it. She obviously has led parts of it.”

    Temple remains amid searches for several other key positions, including chief operating officer and law and engineering school deans.

    Wentz said she was attracted to Temple because she wanted to remain at an urban university and has long admired the work of Fry, who has had a longstanding relationship with Arizona State president Michael M. Crow. Temple a year ago became part of the University Innovation Alliance, a small nonprofit sponsored through Arizona State that is aimed at finding innovations to improve learning and increase college attendance, retention, and graduation rates ― especially for low-income students ― then scaling those innovations.

    “They built a really strong rapport and have a very similar philosophy around higher education which also very much aligns with kind of my own interest and my own philosophy,” Wentz said.

    Both Temple and Arizona State, which has its main campus in Tempe, are major research institutions; Arizona is much bigger with over 194,000 students, compared to Temple with more than 33,000, including its international campuses.

    “Honestly the biggest difference [between the two] is the weather right now,” Wentz joked, noting that it was 81 and sunny in Tempe on Sunday as Philadelphia prepared for blizzard conditions.

    Arizona State does not have a faculty union, so learning to work with Temple’s faculty union will be new.

    “That’s going to be an exciting area for me to learn about,” she said.

    Urban planning background

    Fry has a reputation as an urban planner and in his prior leadership jobs at the University of Pennsylvania, Drexel, and Franklin and Marshall focused on development and improving the campuses and their neighborhoods. He has aspirations for Temple, too, including building an “innovation corridor” stretching from Temple’s recently acquired Terra Hall at Broad and Walnut Streets in Center City to the health campus, a little more than a mile north of main campus on Broad Street.

    Wentz said she and Fry had not talked about urban planning, but that she looks forward to working on the university’s new strategic plan, which includes more green spaces, a new 1,000-bed residence hall, a STEM complex, and an emphasis on more attractive and defined entrances to its North Philadelphia main campus. The three pillars of the plan are student success, research in action, and place-based impact.

    “Those are going to be some really exciting conversations that I look forward to having with John, as well as with the Temple planners to think about how do we make it a safe space for students and a great learning environment.” she said.

    During a 2022 talk at Arizona State, Wentz discussed how urban planning figured into her work.

    “Most of the work that I do applies to the urban environment and urban analytics, so trying to understand how it is that cities work and trying to make the physical urban environment a better place for people to live,” Wentz said during that talk.

    Building trust and collaboration

    In her new role at Temple, she said, early on she will focus on getting to know the community and the university’s financial model and make clear her commitment to shared governance and data-informed decision making.

    Wentz, who grew up near Cleveland and got her bachelor’s in mathematics and master’s in geography at Ohio State University, spent the last 30 years at Arizona State. She became a professor there in 1997.

    She helped the university launch its medical school and has grown graduate enrollment and graduate student funding.

    Wentz said she prides herself on building a culture of trust and collaboration and has worked with the local community. She said she’s looking forward to doing the same at Temple.

    She plans to come to Philadelphia in a couple weeks and look for a place to live, she said.

    “I’m going to come after the snowstorm, I think, instead of before,” she said Sunday.