Category: Washington Post

  • Trump administration launches bold air-taxi push

    Trump administration launches bold air-taxi push

    The Trump administration is seeking to boost U.S. companies as they compete for dominance in the burgeoning air-taxi sector — with an eye toward showcasing the technology at the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles.

    Through executive orders — as well as a new effort to gather data that could help fast-track adoption of these aircraft — the administration has embraced it as part of its transportation agenda.

    In September, Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy announced the launch of a pilot program aimed at exploring ways to integrate these technologies — including air taxis, more formally known as electric vertical takeoff-and-landing aircraft — as well as hybrid-electric and battery-powered planes into the nation’s aviation system.

    For decades, the dream of flying above traffic-clogged roadways has been just that — a dream. But companies such as Archer Aviation, Joby Aviation, and BETA Technologies are pitching their battery-powered aircraft, which take off and land vertically, as a way to revolutionize the way people travel. Meanwhile, Wisk, a Boeing subsidiary, and Reliable Robotics are working on versions that can operate without a pilot — an innovation that could improve the economics of air service and cargo delivery to smaller and more isolated communities.

    BETA Technologies raised more than $1 billion when it went public on the New York Stock Exchange last month, and investors have poured millions into the sector. However, questions remain about whether it will live up to the hype. A plan for air taxis to transport spectators during the 2024 Paris Olympics fizzled, while other high-profile ventures have faltered. Lilium, a German eVTOL company, received an infusion of cash after filing for bankruptcy last year, but was still unable to continue operations, filing for bankruptcy again earlier this year.

    Experts say one key to financial success is making the leap from a novelty for the rich to a transportation option for the masses. Skeptics say the technology is still too unproven to merit government support.

    “We’re talking about spending taxpayer money on something that’s not here yet,” said Rep. Scott Perry (R., Pa.) at a House hearing last week. “The private sector is free to chase this enterprise. As I see it, it can’t beat the physics of a 1960 helicopter.”

    Pilot program hopes

    The public may soon see how these new types of aircraft could change how people and goods move.

    Dec. 19 is the deadline for submissions to the administration’s Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing Integration Pilot Program (eIPP). Modeled after a similar initiative for drone operations launched during President Donald Trump’s first term, it seeks to explore how quieter, cleaner, battery-powered aircraft that take off and land like helicopters can transform aviation. At least five applicants will be chosen.

    “This program represents the launch of a new era of American aviation,” said Greg Bowles, chief policy officer at Joby Aviation, which has been working for more than a decade to bring its aircraft to market. He predicted it will “introduce Joby aircraft into the skies over major U.S. cities” starting next year.

    Sapan Shah, senior director of portfolio management for Advanced Mobility at Honeywell Aerospace, said he expects significant interest from state and local governments across the country that are eager to explore how these new types of planes can benefit their residents. The data collected from the program will offer participants an early look at how these aircraft operate in real-world conditions, and what changes will be needed to incorporate them into existing transportation systems, he said.

    Major players in the industry, including BETA Technologies and Joby Aviation, have already said they plan to apply for the pilot program. In September, Archer Aviation said it hoped to participate in the program alongside United Airlines, an early investor in the company. The selections are expected to be made in March, with operations anticipated within 90 days. The pilot programs are expected to run for three years; Joby and Archer also aim to have a fleet of air taxis flying Olympic spectators around Los Angeles in 2028.

    The state of Michigan also plans to apply, said Bryan Budds, aeronautics director for the Michigan Department of Transportation. As part of a partnership with BETA Technologies, it has installed a network of chargers for electric aircraft at four airports. While much of the focus around air taxis is on how they can move people in dense urban areas, Budds said one potential use in Michigan is moving pharmaceuticals and medical goods to the state’s rural areas.

    There’s also been movement in Congress, which included several provisions aimed at bolstering air taxis in last year’s Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization bill. The industry received another major boost that year when the FAA released standards for air-taxi pilot training and certification.

    To supporters, a main case for investing in these technologies is to ensure the U.S. continues its dominance more broadly of the global aviation industry. China, for example, has already certified an air taxi capable of carrying passengers.

    At the House hearing last week, lawmakers emphasized the importance of ensuring that lead.

    “Either we choose to embrace and unleash American innovation, or we carry on with the status quo and watch as other nations surpass us in new and emerging technology,” said Rep. Troy E. Nehls (R., Texas).

    Even in the early stages, experts say, such programs can yield valuable information.

    With a demonstration program, “we’re getting technology out into the actual markets,” said Laurie Garrow, a civil engineering professor at Georgia Institute of Technology who has followed developments in advanced air mobility.

    These real-world projects will help communities and the FAA understand how these aircraft operate in the existing air traffic system and where the pain points might be, and the data gathered will help policymakers as they attempt to scale up to larger operations, she added.

    Savanthi Syth, an aviation analyst with Raymond James, said giving manufacturers and communities an early opportunity to “try out” the technology in controlled environments means that by the time the aircraft are fully certified, they won’t be starting at square one — they’ll already have information allowing them to move into the next phase of operations.

    Said Syth: “This is a better way than ‘Oh, you have a certified aircraft but now you have to get community buy-in.’”

  • Witness describes terror inside Brown University classroom after gunman entered

    Witness describes terror inside Brown University classroom after gunman entered

    Joseph Oduro had just wrapped up a study session for the final exam in an introductory economics course at Brown University when he heard screaming outside the room and several loud bangs.

    Five seconds later, a door opened at the top of the auditorium-style classroom in the Barus and Holley engineering and physics building. A man dressed in black burst in, yelling something unintelligible. He was carrying “the longest gun I’ve ever seen in my life,” Oduro said in an interview Sunday.

    Oduro, a senior from New Jersey, is a teaching assistant in the principles of economics course, one of the most popular classes on campus. On Saturday afternoon, he was reviewing the course material with 60-odd students ahead of Tuesday’s exam.

    Oduro, 21, locked eyes with the shooter. A single thought went through his mind: Get down.

    He crouched behind the podium where only moments earlier he had been offering students words of encouragement ahead of their final exam. He heard shots, dozens of them, and screams. Students began running down the aisles to get away. Some escaped through the side doors at the bottom of the classroom while others huddled with Oduro, all trying to stay as quiet as possible.

    One of them was a first-year student from Massachusetts who had been shot twice in the leg. Oduro gave her his hand and told her to squeeze it. “I told her to put all the pain on me,” Oduro said. “I just kept telling her, ‘You’re going to be okay.’”

    The attack at the Ivy League school left two students dead and nine others wounded, officials said. Early Sunday, a person of interest was taken into custody, according to Providence Mayor Brett Smiley (D).

    Oduro doesn’t know how long it took for police to arrive. There were other victims in the classroom and Oduro got his first real look at the scene as he was escorted out by police. He didn’t want to describe what he saw.

    Oduro stayed with his wounded first-year student in the back of a police car all the way to the hospital. He wanted to make sure she would be all right. It sounded corny, he knew, but he truly loved the students in the class, where he has been a teaching assistant since his sophomore year.

    It hurt, he said, “to see them all in a state of panic and desperate pain.”

    After hours at the hospital and questioning by the police, Oduro went to stay at a friend’s place who lives off campus. His voice was quiet and full of exhaustion. He had no idea what would come next.

    On Sunday morning, Brown said that all remaining exams and classes for the semester were canceled.

  • How baby boomers got so rich, and why their kids are unlikely to catch up

    How baby boomers got so rich, and why their kids are unlikely to catch up

    Baby boomers hold more than $85 trillion in assets, making them the richest generation by far. New research explores the extraordinary rise in their good fortunes — one that experts say successive generations will be hard-pressed to replicate.

    The reasons come down to timing and time: Americans 75 and older bought homes and invested in stocks well before such assets exploded in value, according to Edward Wolff, an economics professor at New York University. In a working paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research, he examined the four decades between 1983 and 2022 when those older boomers’ saw their wealth climb and their younger peers recorded relative declines.

    “It’s astonishing how their relative wealth has taken off in the last 30 plus years,” Wolff said. “They started out as among the poorest groups in terms of wealth back in 1983.”

    The wealth of baby boomers — especially those in retirement — is a reflection of the uniquely favorable economic conditions that occurred during their working lives, Wolff and other economists said. So much so that it would be difficult for younger generations to emulate, especially as they are more likely to be weighed down by debt or childcare costs.

    Housing costs also factor into the widening divide between baby boomers (born from 1946 to 1964), and everyone else, experts say. Generation X (1965 to 1980), millennials (1981 to 1996), and their successors increasingly dedicate a bigger portion of their budgets to mortgage or rent.

    Without considering the historical backdrop that let many boomers buy homes and invest in stock before decades of asset appreciation, people might overstate the extent to which the generation’s wealth reflects their superior financial decision-making, said Olivia Mitchell, professor of business economics and public policy at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School.

    What happened?

    Good economic conditions

    Baby boomers “entered the labor force during decades of strong economic growth, rising productivity, and relatively high real wages,” Mitchell said. They were in their prime earning and saving years during long bull markets, namely in the 1980s and ’90s, she said, as well as the economic recovery that followed the Great Recession. They faced lower tuition and healthcare costs, and benefited from favorable tax policies, including lower capital gains tax rates, she said.

    By contrast, younger generations endured the Great Recession — which ran from late 2007 to mid-2009 — early in their careers and more volatile capital markets afterward, she said.

    And “particularly for middle-income workers, real wage gains since the 2000s have been modest, compared to the robust wage growth that boomers benefited from mid-career,” Mitchell said.

    By age 30, the average millennial had about twice as much debt as their baby boomer counterpart, said Jeremy Ney, a professor at Columbia University’s business school.

    Post-World War II, “you had this tremendous boom that many got to ride for a very long period of time,” Ney said. “And when you compare that to the bursting of the dot-com bubble, when you compare that to the 2008 housing crisis, when you compare that to the declines of COVID, it made it much more difficult for people to invest, accumulate wealth.”

    The rise of 401(k)s and stock holdings

    Some older boomers benefited from having access to defined-benefit pension plans, many of which were phased out in the private sector in the 1980s as tax-advantaged 401(k)s became commonplace. The rise of such employer-sponsored retirement plans also drove up baby boomers’ stock holdings.

    Today, about half of baby boomers’ wealth is tied up in cash, bonds, stocks, or mutual funds held directly or through retirement accounts, or other financial holdings, Mitchell said, citing 2023 survey data from the Federal Reserve. Though the generation makes up about one-fifth of the population, they hold more than half of corporate equities and mutual fund shares.

    Baby boomers have accumulated $85.4 trillion in wealth through the second quarter, according to Federal Reserve data. That’s nearly twice as much as Gen X and four times more than millennials.

    Younger generations are more likely to have debt, leaving less to save or invest, Ney said, citing student loans and childcare costs that nearly doubled between the mid-1980s and 2011, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

    “In 1940 there was a 90% chance that you were going to earn more than your parents. To somebody born today, it is just a coin flip,” Ney said.

    Millennials and Generation Z (those born between 1997 and 2012) also tend to be more risk-averse when it comes to investing in the stock market, compared with members of the Silent Generation (1928 to 1945), boomers, and Gen X that lived through better economies, Ney said.

    “Gen Z does not buy the dip,” he said. “They are too nervous to engage in the stock market” when prices are low.

    The big story: Housing

    Perhaps the biggest share of baby boomers’ wealth comes from their home.

    Many were better positioned to buy or refinance their homes during stretches with particularly low interest rates, including after the Great Recession and during the COVID-19 pandemic, said Annamaria Lusardi, academic director of Stanford University’s Initiative for Financial Decision-Making.

    The nation’s median home price was $410,800 in the second quarter, compared with the $327,100 recorded just before the pandemic started in 2020, Federal Reserve data show. Medians are significantly higher in the Northeast ($796,700) and the West ($531,100).

    By comparison, the median home price in the first quarter of 1976 — when the oldest boomers were 30 — was $42,800, Fed data show. That would be $242,400 adjusted for inflation.

    While higher home valuations have bolstered the net worth of existing owners, Lusardi said, they’re outpacing the earnings of younger adults. Nor are they helped by current mortgage rates, which have hovered above 6% on a 30-year loan since September 2022.

    About one-third of baby boomers’ wealth today is equity in their primary residence, Mitchell said, citing the 2023 survey. Boomers overall bought homes at younger ages than later cohorts and when prices were significantly lower, allowing them to benefit from decades of home appreciation.

    The typical age of first-time home buyers recently hit an all-time high of 40 years, up from late 20s in the 1980s, according to a 2025 National Association of Realtors survey.

    “Even when you look at that same age, you tend to see much lower rates of homeownership, and therefore much lower rates of wealth accumulation,” Ney said.

    Michael Walden, a professor emeritus of economics at North Carolina State University, said some of the divergence might be due to preference — such as younger adults preferring to rent rather than assume responsibility for home repairs, or to wait for a perfect home rather than settling for a starter home they might hold onto for a few years until they had enough equity to move up.

    “Their attitude about buying housing is very different than what my parents ingrained in me which was” to ‘just get your foot in the door’ with a starter house, Walden said. “It’s probably not going to be adequate, but a few years later, you’ll be able to sell it for more and just work your way up.”

  • National Guardsman shot in D.C. making ‘extraordinary progress,’ doctor says

    National Guardsman shot in D.C. making ‘extraordinary progress,’ doctor says

    The National Guard member who was ambushed while patrolling near the White House on Thanksgiving eve is now breathing on his own and can stand with assistance, his neurosurgeon said Friday.

    Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe, 24, was hospitalized Nov. 26 after a gunman opened fire on him and his colleague, Spc. Sarah Beckstrom, 20, who died of her injuries the following day. The attack left Wolfe with a “critical” gunshot wound to his head, and he was airlifted to MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Jeffrey Mai said in a statement.

    Mai credited quick-acting first responders and the actions of trauma and neurosurgery teams for saving Wolfe’s life by controlling the serviceman’s bleeding and pressure on his brain. Mai called Wolfe’s recent recovery developments “important milestones that reflect his strength and determination.”

    “Staff Sgt. Wolfe has made extraordinary progress,” the doctor said. “Based on these improvements, he is now ready to transition from acute care to inpatient rehabilitation as the next step in his recovery journey.”

    Wolfe’s family, including his father, Jason, and mother, Melody, have chosen not to disclose the location of his rehabilitation, Mai added.

    Wolfe, who joined the West Virginia National Guard in 2019, and Beckstrom were among more than 2,000 Guard members deployed to D.C. after President Donald Trump’s announcement of a “crime emergency” in the city in August. Following the attack, Trump ordered an additional 500 troops to the District.

    The suspect in the attack, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan national who served in the CIA’s “Zero Units” that seized or killed suspected terrorists, has been charged with first-degree murder.

    Prosecutors have not given a motive for the shooting. Charging documents say Lakanwal, who settled in Washington state after the 2021 U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, drove across the country to carry out the attack and allegedly shouted “Allahu akbar!” as he shot Beckstrom and Wolfe in their heads with a .357-caliber revolver outside the Farragut West Metro station. The phrase is Arabic for “God is great.” A Washington Post investigation found that Lakanwal slipped deeper into isolation as he struggled to adapt with his wife and five children in the United States.

    Lakanwal, who was also shot during the attack, pleaded not guilty through an attorney at the hearing Dec. 2. He spoke through an interpreter to give brief responses and appeared remotely by video from a hospital bed.

    There had been earlier signs that Wolfe’s recovery was trending positively. On Dec. 5, West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey (R) shared publicly that Wolfe’s “parents report that his head wound is slowly healing and that he’s beginning to ‘look more like himself.’”

    Jordan Butler, a local pastor and friend of the Wolfe family, coled a vigil last week at the high school Wolfe attended in Inwood, a tight-knit West Virginia community where vigil attendees prayed and lit candles for Wolfe.

    “It’s amazing watching what’s happening,” Butler told the Post on Wednesday. “It’s almost miraculous.”

    On Friday, Wolfe’s parents said in a statement released by MedStar that they hope their son will be able to return to work in the West Virginia National Guard “and his new mission of being a light into this world.”

    “Please continue to lift Andy up in prayer as he begins a long and tough rehabilitation,” Jason and Melody Wolfe said. “We know he will continue to improve at a rapid pace.”

  • VA plans to abruptly eliminate tens of thousands of healthcare jobs

    VA plans to abruptly eliminate tens of thousands of healthcare jobs

    The Department of Veterans Affairs plans to abruptly eliminate as many as 35,000 healthcare positions this month, mostly unfilled jobs including doctors, nurses, and support staff, according to an internal memo, VA staffers, and congressional aides.

    The cuts come after a massive reorganization effort already resulted in the loss of almost 30,000 employees this year.

    Agency leaders have instructed managers across the Veterans Health Administration, the agency’s healthcare arm, to identify thousands of openings that can be canceled. Employees warn that the contraction will add pressure to an already stretched system, contributing to longer wait times for care.

    The decision comes after Veterans Affairs Secretary Douglas A. Collins, under political pressure from Congress, backed away from a plan to slash 15% of the agency’s workforce through mass firings. Instead, VA lost almost 30,000 employees this year from buyout offers and attrition.

    The agency hopes that the cuts will reduce the healthcare workforce to as little as 372,000 employees, a 10% reduction from last year, according to a memo shared with regional leaders last month and obtained by the Washington Post. Details of the cuts came into focus in recent days, according to 17 staffers at VA and congressional aides who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they didn’t have permission to share plans.

    VA spokesperson Pete Kasperowicz confirmed the planned cuts for unfilled positions. He said the healthcare system is eliminating about 26,400 of its open jobs, which he described as “mostly COVID-era roles that are no longer necessary.”

    “The vast majority of these positions have not been filled for more than a year, underscoring how they are no longer needed,” he wrote in response to questions. “This move will have no effect on VA operations or the way the department delivers care to Veterans, as we are simply eliminating open and unfilled positions that are no longer needed.”

    The nation’s largest government-run healthcare system has struggled to fill vacancies amid a broader national shortage of healthcare workers and a strained federal workforce. Job applications to the agency have also fallen 57% from last year, according to the agency’s workforce report last month.

    This reorganization comes in advance of an expected announcement next week that Collins plans to also shrink the network of 18 regional offices that administer the nation’s VA hospitals and medical centers, according to four people familiar with the plan. Staff at those regional offices help determine policies and manage staffing. Collins and others have been critical of the agency’s top-heavy administrative offices, arguing that staffing cuts there will free up more resources for healthcare.

    The health system grew by tens of thousands of employees under the Biden administration as more veterans enrolled in VA healthcare after passage of the PACT Act, which expanded benefits for veterans exposed to toxic burn pits. Then-secretary Denis McDonough urged veterans to be seen by VA doctors rather than request referrals to private practitioners outside the system.

    But the Trump administration has said it wants more veterans to seek treatment outside the government system. Political appointees at VA and their allies have also said they favor a leaner healthcare workforce because they think physicians and other healthcare providers could be more productive, said one former appointee who is close to the Trump team.

    Collins stood down from planned mass firings this year after a bipartisan mix of lawmakers expressed concerns about cuts affecting patient care. The agency said mission-critical positions were exempted from the buyouts and retirement offers.

    Since then, lawmakers have sought greater oversight of the agency’s staffing plans. In the agreement to reopen the government last month, lawmakers allocated $133 billion in discretionary funding for the VA with conditions, including that the agency could not reduce staffing for suicide prevention programs, would provide updates on staffing counts, and would maintain the staff necessary to meet certain thresholds for processing benefits and providing healthcare.

    The House also approved a measure Thursday overturning President Donald Trump’s executive order eliminating union rights at federal agencies, including VA, where the union had said it was harder to protect jobs without collective bargaining.

    Thomas Dargon Jr., deputy general counsel of the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents more than 320,000 VA employees, said the union has not been consulted by the agency about the cuts but has heard about concerns from its members.

    “The VA has been chronically understaffed for years, and employees are obviously going to be facing the brunt of any further job cuts or reorganization that results in employees having to do more work with less,” Dargon said.

    Sharda Fornnarino, a VA nurse in Colorado and local head of her nurses’ union, said her facility continues to lack the necessary staff to keep up with demand, and she urged lawmakers to restore collective bargaining so nurses could advocate for safer working conditions. The measure is unlikely to pass the Republican-held Senate.

    “We’re going to continue to do more with less,” Fornnarino said. “We’re going to continue to be overworked.”

    Meanwhile, at the VA’s regional offices, leadership is determining which roles they would need to cancel, and several healthcare workers said they had been warned their hospitals would be affected. Regional leaders were told to ensure their organizational charts are updated by next week, according to the memo reviewed by the Post.

    In Phoenix, 358 openings will be eliminated, including nurses and doctors, according to a nurse who said the losses will hit as they are already behind in scheduling doctors appointments.

    “They specifically said no department would be spared,” she said.

    In another Mountain West hospital, healthcare workers were told at a town hall last week that no current employees would lose their jobs, though if anyone leaves, they would need to determine whether they could keep those jobs, according to a recording of the meeting.

    The bad news arrived last Friday for employees of the VA San Diego healthcare system, in an exclamation mark-filled email from director Frank Pearson.

    He wrote that he’d been expecting this year to fill 734 job vacancies with new nurses, doctors, and other staff, to help care for the almost 90,000 veterans that the San Diego system regularly serves. But sometime this fall, he wrote, higher-ups decided to “do some housekeeping and cleanup of the books” — informing the San Diego system that it only had the budget to retain 4,429 employees going into fiscal year 2026.

    That meant, Pearson wrote in bold, all-caps, underlined letters, that “322 VACANT POSITIONS need to be eliminated.”

    One of the VA employees who received the email said that, in the mental health section alone, there were 78 open positions as of this month — about half of which will now go away. Currently, the employee noted, veterans in the San Diego area are waiting between 60 and 90 days to access VA mental health services.

    Staff are already strained and exhausted after a difficult year, the employee said, and were counting on reinforcements.

    “We are all doing the work of others to compensate,” she said. “The idea that relief isn’t coming is really, really disappointing.”

  • Adolescence lasts into your 30s, and other surprises about the brain

    Adolescence lasts into your 30s, and other surprises about the brain

    The human brain has four distinct turning points where its structure changes, according to a study published in the journal Nature Communications, demonstrating that brain development is not as linear as you might think.

    “It’s easy to fall into this belief that there’s a ‘good’ or ‘bad’ way for a brain to be structured,” said lead study author Alexa Mousley at the University of Cambridge. “And that’s not really the case. What this study is emphasizing is the brain is expected to be doing something different at different ages.”

    In the new study, Mousley and colleagues looked at around 4,000 scans from healthy people ages 0 to 90 and analyzed their brains. They found four major times when the brain underwent developmental changes, around ages 9, 32, 66, and 83, dividing the life span into five distinct phases.

    “It’s yet another very nice example of how the brain and its global interactions change across the life span,” said Seth Grant, a neuroscientist at The University of Edinburgh who wasn’t involved in the new research. “The message is, there is continuous change from birth until old age. It’s not as if you suddenly build a brain and it stays the same and then just drops off at old age. It’s always changing.”

    Mousley and her co-authors identified five epochs during which the brain is wired in different ways.

    1. Childhood

    From infancy to 9 years old, the brain is busy. There is a lot of consolidation of neural connections happening, competitive elimination of synapses, and rapid increases in gray and white matter. But interestingly the brain is becoming less efficient during this time — so it takes longer for information to get from one region of the brain to another. The researchers don’t fully understand why this would be the pattern, but they have some theories.

    “We know that in very early life, the brain makes more connections than it needs, and then it prunes them away,” Mousley said. “It’s unclear if that is kind of what’s happening here, but it is potentially what’s happening.”

    Whatever the reason for the brain becoming less efficient during childhood, it is a time when a lot of learning happens — language, motor skills, speech — and there is likely a reason that the brain is structured the way that it is during this period.

    “It could be that this decreasing efficiency is potentially related to this incredible moment of learning,” Mousley said.

    2. Adolescence

    There is a dramatic turning point that the researchers saw occurring around the age of 9 on average — a time when many children begin to enter puberty. The brain switches gears and starts rewiring to become more efficient.

    The adolescence phase the researchers identified lasts for two decades, into the early 30s on average. This is when people are most vulnerable to developing a mental health disorder, but it’s also a critical time for brain development.

    “It is really important to think about adolescence as this protracted window,” said Katie Insel, a psychologist at Northwestern University who studies how the brain changes over the course of adolescence. She said that while in our society we may think of 18- or 21-year-olds as adults, this research adds to a growing body of work suggesting that the brain isn’t fully developed or stable until our late 20s or even early 30s.

    “Something that sets us apart as humans from other animals is how slowly we develop,” Mousley said. “A giraffe can stand up very soon after being born, but human babies just take a very long time to learn to walk, to eat.”

    Mousley suggested that this slower development might give humans the opportunity to develop more complex brain connections, and could be related to the things that humans can do that other animals can’t.

    3. Adulthood

    Adulthood is the longest phase — lasting for more than three decades from around 32 years old until around 66 years old.

    “It does seem to be this kind of period of relative stability,” Mousley said. “It’s consistent for a very long period of time.”

    That doesn’t mean that the brain isn’t changing during this period, but the changes are less dramatic than during other phases. This is also a period of stability in terms of intelligence, behavior, and personality.

    “If you just think about what an adult is compared to a teenager, you kind of assume there’s kind of a level of stability there in terms of how people are behaving. And that’s aligning with this three-decade period of consistent brain rewiring from our study,” Mousley said.

    4. Early aging

    Around 66 years old on average, the researchers saw another turning point. This is a time when the brain seems to become more vulnerable to age-related diseases — but the news isn’t all bad for the aging brain.

    “There’s an expected and healthy, typical way for the brain to shift,” Mousley said.

    Insel noted that in addition to some of the negative changes people might associate with aging, like memory loss, there are also positive changes. Older adults tend to be wiser and better at emotional regulation.

    “There are pros and cons to every developmental stage,” Insel said. “I think with every phase of life, there are trade-offs where some types of cognition and behavior are privileged because of how the brain is responding to the environment.”

    5. Late aging

    From 83 onward, the researchers identified a “late aging” phase.

    “What we’re seeing during that late aging phase is something called ‘increasing centrality,’” Mousley said. Particular regions of the brain become more important than others during this time. There is reduced connectivity, but there seems to be a pattern to that change.

    The metaphor Mousley used was that of changing bus routes. If you had a direct bus to work, but one day it stopped running and you had to take two buses, the transfer station would suddenly become very important. She theorized that the brain might be prioritizing important connections if other connections drop off.

    What it means

    The word “development” is often associated with childhood or the teenage years — but what this new research demonstrates is that the brain develops continually throughout our lives.

    “We often ascribe certain brain changes to negative outcomes in adulthood or later life,” Insel said. “But actually there’s certain cognitive features that can be really helpful and useful in aging.” By zooming out and looking at how the brain changes over the course of our lifetimes, Insel hopes that we can have a better understanding of what to expect at these different ages, and why our brains might be more vulnerable to certain disorders in adolescence or older age respectively.

    Yaakov Stern, a neuroscientist at Columbia University, noted that a good next step would be to try to understand exactly how these measures of the brain might be related to cognitive processes — essentially connecting the dots between this research and other work that has looked at the way our brains function throughout our lives.

    He added that many of the things that affect brain development are within our control — such as diet, exercise and social connection.

    “The brain changes with aging. We know that,” Stern said. “What interests me, is there are exposures that seem to be associated with more successful aging.”

  • Delaware’s acting U.S. attorney resigns amid fight over Trump’s appointees

    Delaware’s acting U.S. attorney resigns amid fight over Trump’s appointees

    President Donald Trump’s U.S. attorney in Delaware abruptly resigned Friday amid a growing standoff over the administration’s authority to install loyalists in powerful prosecutorial roles while bypassing Senate confirmation and the courts.

    Julianne Murray, a former chair of the Delaware Republican Party whom the Justice Department had appointed as interim U.S. attorney in the state this summer, announced her departure in a statement posted to social media. She said a recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit disqualifying Trump’s U.S. attorney in New Jersey, Alina Habba, had made it clear to her she could no longer stay in her role.

    Habba resigned from her post on Monday after the court ruled she had been unlawfully appointed through a process that administration officials had also used to keep Murray in her role. The Philadelphia-based 3rd Circuit handles appeals arising from Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and its rulings extend throughout that jurisdiction.

    “I naively believed that I would be judged on my performance and not politics,” Murray said in her statement. “Unfortunately that was not the case.”

    Murray said she will continue to work for the Justice Department in a different capacity but did not indicate what her new job might be. Her former office will now be overseen by her first assistant U.S. attorney, Ben Wallace, who has worked as a prosecutor in the office since 2023.

    Murray’s initial appointment in July drew controversy given her lack of prosecutorial experience and the fact that she was still serving as head of the Delaware Republican Party when she was named interim U.S. attorney. She resigned from that role shortly afterward.

    Her statement Friday saying she would step down as U.S. attorney used many of the same turns of phrase as the resignation letter she submitted to the state party five months earlier. In both, she said she refused to allow her office “to be used as a political football.”

    While the nation’s 93 U.S. attorneys are appointed through a political process and are often affiliated with the president’s party, their jobs have traditionally been viewed as largely apolitical. Most come from traditional legal backgrounds, not openly partisan roles.

    Since Trump’s return to the White House, his administration has made installing loyalists in these position a priority.

    In addition to Murray and Habba, his former personal lawyer, the Justice Department has appointed other controversial allies to U.S. attorney roles on an interim basis. They included Bill Essayli, a former GOP state assemblyman named U.S. attorney in Los Angeles; Sigal Chattah, a former GOP committeewoman in Nevada; and Lindsey Halligan, another former Trump lawyer, in Eastern Virginia.

    Federal law limited each of their interim appointments to a period of 120 days and empowered the federal courts to appoint a replacement if there was no Senate-confirmed nominee by that deadline. But when the terms of Murray, Habba and the others expired, the Justice Department sought to keep Trump’s picks in their roles through complex maneuvers that the 3rd Circuit has ruled were illegal.

    In Murray’s case, Delaware’s chief U.S. district judge, Colm Connolly, a Trump appointee, began soliciting applications for her replacement weeks before her 120 days were up. The move drew a sharp rebuke from Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, another former Trump attorney who now serves in the Justice Department’s No. 2 position.

    When Murray’s interim term expired in November, Delaware’s judges declined to reappoint her but did not immediately name a replacement. The Justice Department responded by changing Murray’s title to “acting” U.S. attorney and maintained that the president had the authority to keep her in her job indefinitely.

    Within hours of Murray’s resignation, the judges on Friday posted notice that they were appointing Wallace as acting U.S. attorney.

    Unlike Habba, Chattah, Essayli, and Halligan, whose appointments federal courts have all ruled to be unlawful, Murray had not drawn a legal challenge questioning her legitimacy. In her statement Friday, she blamed Delaware’s U.S. senators — Chris Coons and Lisa Blunt Rochester, both Democrats — of sinking her prospects in the job.

    Normally, the president must formally nominate his U.S. attorney picks, and they must be approved in a Senate vote. In the case of Murray and the others, their home-state senators — all Democrats — had said they would withhold their support should Trump formally nominate them to the role.

    That decision effectively killed any chance of their nominations moving forward under a Senate custom known as the “blue slip,” which allows senators to veto judicial and U.S. attorney nominees for their states.

    Trump has railed against the blue slip tradition, saying it interferes with his ability to install his chosen candidates. Sen. Chuck Grassley — the Iowa Republican who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee — has resisted pressure from the president to abandon the custom, saying it gives senators of both parties an important voice in deciding who will fill powerful law enforcement roles in their states.

    Coons and Blunt Rochester said they had concluded Murray “was not the right person” for the job after interviewing her and a number of other potential candidates.

    “I look forward to working with the District Court’s appointed U.S. Attorney, Ben Wallace, and remain willing to work with the Trump administration to identify and confirm a mutually agreeable candidate,” Coons said in a statement.

    Murray called the blue slip process “highly politicized” and “incredibly flawed,” saying it cost Delaware a U.S. attorney.

    “The people that think they have chased me away will soon find out that they are mistaken,” she wrote. “I did not get here by being a shrinking violet.”

  • George Washington’s living quarters back on display after restoration

    George Washington’s living quarters back on display after restoration

    Only keen-eyed visitors will notice some of the subtle changes to George Washington’s Mount Vernon home, like a new finishing on the mantle in the former president’s study or the reworked underground framing of the house.

    But curators say each minuscule change to the sprawling Virginia estate can help visitors better understand the nation’s past, and therefore their place in the world today.

    Construction fences have lined the back of the mansion for the better part of two years as work continues on a $40 million project to restore the building to its 18th century integrity. Though work is ongoing, the first and second floor of the home are now open to the public for the first time since January 2024.

    A worker at the estate Wednesday, the day of an event marking the reopening of the first and second floors to the public.

    Heading into America’s 250th anniversary, Mount Vernon President and CEO Doug Bradburn said bolstering authenticity at the estate is more important than ever.

    “You cannot understand the United States of America’s founding without the indispensable George Washington,” Bradburn said. “You can’t understand him without Mount Vernon.”

    Washington lived at the estate along the Potomac River with his wife, Martha, for the last 45 years of his life. When he inherited the mansion, it stood at about 3,500 square feet. The serene view of the Potomac welcomed Washington home after he led American forces to victory in the Revolutionary War. He retired to Mount Vernon after serving as the nation’s first president.

    By the time Washington died in 1799, he had expanded the dwelling to more than triple that size, with more than 20 rooms. Most of the work was performed by people enslaved on the estate, officials have said.

    A bust of George Washington at the estate.

    The estate passed down through family members after Washington’s death until the Mount Vernon Ladies Association secured it in 1860. Since then, the nonprofit has worked to restore the remaining 500 acres of property to how it appeared when Washington died. The association has never accepted any government funding, and it solely relies on earned income and donations.

    Nearly 1 million people visit Washington’s home, located about 20 miles south of the nation’s capital, each year.

    “We believe in the power of place,” said Anne Neal Petri, regent of the Mount Vernon Ladies Association. “We want to engage the visitor in ways that the history books just can’t achieve.”

    This bout of rehabilitation is the largest in Mount Vernon’s history. Born from necessity after centuries of termite damage detached the building from its foundation, there wasn’t a single piece of original 18th century woodwork left underground, said Thomas Reinhart, director of the estate’s preservation.

    Only parts of Mount Vernon closed during the restoration. The extensive grounds, Washington’s tomb and the quarters for enslaved people remained open. The renovations focused only on Washington’s living quarters, called the mansion.

    To rebuild the mansion’s wooden frame, workers harvested white oak from the property, similar to how Washington would have sourced wood for the original construction. Only now, every piece of wood that touches masonry has added termite shields.

    “Termites are quite tenacious,” Reinhart said.

    From preservation carpenters, engineers, archaeologists and collection curators, it’s estimated about 350 people have worked on the restoration so far. Besides the structural changes, specialists throughout the house restoration performed paint analysis on doorframes and trims to make them accurate.

    Painters at Mount Vernon on Wednesday.

    The most noticeable visual differences are on the second floor, in the most intimate area of the house.

    Step into Washington’s bedroom, and visitors will see walls newly enveloped by a soft blue wallpaper with a bright floral design featuring a birdbath and two bright orange lovebirds.

    After referencing preserved documents, Amanda Isaac, a curator at the estate, said historians chose a replica 1790s French wallpaper based on a design that existed when Washington remodeled the home.

    She said with the most recent changes — which also included tearing the walls down to the studs and replastering them with historically accurate techniques — is a room that most resembles how the home looked when the Washingtons lived at Mount Vernon. It has nine of the original furnishings of the room, including the exact bedframe Washington died on.

    George and Martha Washington’s bedroom.

    Perhaps the largest undertaking is still ongoing.

    Underground, droves of people are still working to restore a cellar spanning the entire footprint of the house. That part of the home is being refinished to look like it did when it housed the enslaved Lee family, who served the Washingtons as valet, cook and butler. The estate is also adding an underground bunker to store an upgraded HVAC system created to better preserve and maintain the home.

    Though it’s been centuries since Washington walked the property, signs of his life are still littered around the land. While excavating the cellar, archaeologists discovered 35 glass bottles of preserved berries, 20 of which are still intact and now on display at the Mount Vernon museum.

    As the country looks to the future, Mount Vernon serves as a fixture of the past, forever reminding the nation how far it has come.

    “You can’t go to Rome without seeing the Colosseum, and you can’t go to Washington, D.C., without seeing Mount Vernon,” Bradburn said.

    Today’s rehabilitation is the largest in Mount Vernon’s history.
  • Secret meetings between FBI and Ukraine negotiator spark concern

    Secret meetings between FBI and Ukraine negotiator spark concern

    Secret meetings between Ukraine’s top peace negotiator and FBI leaders have injected new uncertainty into the high-stakes talks to end the war there, according to diplomats and officials familiar with the matter.

    Over the last several weeks, President Volodymyr Zelensky’s lead negotiator, Rustem Umerov, flew to Miami three times to meet with President Donald Trump’s top envoy, Steve Witkoff, and discuss a proposal to end the nearly four-year conflict with Russia.

    But during his time in the United States, Umerov also held closed-door meetings with FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino, according to four people, who like some others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss confidential conversations.

    The meetings have caused alarm among Western officials who remain in the dark about their intent and purpose. Some said they believe Umerov and other Ukrainian officials sought out Patel and Bongino in the hopes of obtaining amnesty from any corruption allegations the Ukrainians could face. Others worry the newly established channel could be used to exert pressure on Zelensky’s government to accept a peace deal, proposed by the Trump administration, containing steep concessions for Kyiv.

    Ukrainian Ambassador to Washington Olha Stefanishyna confirmed Umerov’s meeting with the FBI and told the Washington Post he “only covered national security related issues” that could not be disclosed publicly.

    An FBI official said the Umerov meetings included discussion of the two countries’ shared law enforcement and national security interests. The topic of white collar corruption in Ukraine came up in one of the meetings but was not the main focus, the official said. Any suggestion that Patel’s discussions were inappropriate is “complete nonsense,” the official added.

    The two FBI leaders have criticized Ukraine in various public comments. Patel in March questioned the scale of U.S. aid to Ukraine and urged Congress to investigate whether any U.S. funds sent there were misused. Bongino has accused Zelensky of covering up the allegedly corrupt activities of President Joe Biden’s son, whose board seat on a Ukrainian energy company has faced intense scrutiny. Trump “is very suspicious of Zelensky, because of what he and some of the people in his government did to sweep under the rug the Joe Biden madness,” Bongino said in February.

    A White House official said “U.S. officials regularly communicate with world leaders about national security issues of shared interest.” The official added that Trump’s national security team has been “speaking with both the Russians and the Ukrainians to facilitate a deal to end the war” and that anyone raising concerns about the FBI meetings “are not privy to these diplomatic conversations and have no idea what they are talking about.”

    A representative of Zelensky’s office declined to comment on any specific meetings but insisted that “it is stupid to link everything to ‘corruption.’”

    The New York Post noted Umerov’s meeting with Patel in an article published Nov. 28. Bongino’s meeting with Umerov has not been previously reported.

    The discussions are happening at a critical moment for Ukraine. It is under pressure by the Trump administration to agree to an end-of-war proposal with huge implications for the country’s borders and territorial integrity.

    It is also facing its most far-reaching corruption scandal since Zelensky took office in 2019. Ukrainian investigators alleged last month that $100 million had been stolen from the country’s energy sector through graft and kickbacks.

    Eight people, including Zelensky’s former business partner, are accused of embezzlement, money laundering and illicit self-dealing. Zelensky’s top aide, Andriy Yermak, the second most powerful person in Ukraine, resigned in late November after his house was raided. Another close former ally of Zelensky, Oleksiy Chernyshov, who served as deputy prime minister, is accused by Ukrainian authorities of receiving $1.3 million in kickbacks.

    “They do have a massive corruption situation going on there,” Trump told reporters this week, noting that the scandal was generating calls for elections in Ukraine. “People are asking this question: When do they have an election?”

    Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 prompted Kyiv to enact martial law, including the postponement of presidential and parliamentary elections.

    There is speculation inside and outside Kyiv over whether Umerov, who also serves as Ukraine’s national security adviser, may be implicated in the expanding embezzlement investigation, particularly as the country’s anti-corruption officials expand their probe into the defense sector. Umerov previously served as Ukraine’s defense minister.

    “I was surprised they sent him to negotiate given what’s being said about his potential involvement in the scandal,” said Angela Stent, a former intelligence officer in the George W. Bush administration and scholar at Georgetown University.

    Ukrainian opposition lawmaker Volodymyr Ariev told the Post that it was irresponsible to keep Umerov on as top negotiator while he’s under a cloud of suspicion. “A person who has grown a tail with corruption allegations shouldn’t chair fateful negotiations until they cut the tail,” Ariev said.

    Umerov’s defenders say he is an asset to Kyiv: His easygoing demeanor and proficient English have created a better rapport with U.S. officials than they had with Yermak, whom Zelensky relied on heavily before he resigned.

    But his FBI meetings have raised suspicion among Ukraine’s Western backers given the presence of Patel, who became a focal point of Trump’s first impeachment, which centered on the president’s threat to revoke U.S. aid to Ukraine to extract information on Hunter Biden’s activities in the country. Trump was acquitted by the Senate.

    Fiona Hill, a former Trump administration official, testified before Congress that Patel had involved himself in Ukraine issues in a manner that went beyond the scope of his job as a White House adviser, according to what she was told by colleagues. The impeachment report released by House Democrats also highlighted Patel’s discussions with Rudy Giuliani before the Trump administration’s suspension of $400 million in military aid to Ukraine.

    Hill told the Post for this report that Patel’s reemergence is “likely to be viewed with even more concern and consternation in Europe.”

    Patel has always denied he had a back channel with Trump on Ukraine during his first term and said his discussions with Giuliani were unrelated to Ukraine.

    FBI officials have worked for years with Ukraine’s National Anti-Corruption Bureau, or NABU, to help the government in Kyiv overcome endemic corruption stemming from its Soviet past. But high-level meetings between a top Ukrainian negotiator and the director of the FBI are not common.

    “It is unusual for someone in that job to have a meeting with the leadership of the FBI,” said Sam Charap, a former State Department official and scholar at the Rand Corporation.

    A common theme of Trump’s Ukraine diplomacy, particularly as he has expressed frustration about delays in getting to a deal, is expanding the number of aides assigned to work on the issue. Besides Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Witkoff, a real estate magnate and longtime friend, Trump has also enlisted his son-in-law Jared Kushner and Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll, an ally of Vice President JD Vance.

    The growing number officials involved in the talks has caused miscommunication and confusion surrounding the deal’s terms and what the United States supports.

    Several U.S. officials support a proposal in which Ukraine withdraws from Donetsk in eastern Ukraine in exchange for other areas under Russian control, such as the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant.

    Earlier this week, Zelensky pushed back against the idea of Ukraine relinquishing any territory. “Under our laws, under international law — and under moral law — we have no right to give anything away,” Zelensky said after meeting with top European leaders. “That is what we are fighting for.”

    But as negotiations have stalled, Russian forces have made advances in the East, exploiting Ukraine’s shortages in ammunition and fighters. It also continues to bomb Ukraine’s electrical infrastructure, triggering rolling blackouts and raising fears of widespread outages this winter.

    Trump has made clear his patience is wearing thin, and that if Ukraine doesn’t negotiate for land it could end up losing even more on the battlefield.

    “You’re losing thousands of people a week,” Trump said. “It’s time to get that war settled.”

  • National Trust sues to stop Trump’s ballroom construction

    National Trust sues to stop Trump’s ballroom construction

    Historic preservationists begged President Donald Trump in October not to rapidly demolish the White House’s East Wing annex for his ballroom project, urging him to wait for federal review panels and allow the public to weigh in. Now a group charged by Congress with helping to preserve historic buildings is asking a judge to block construction until those reviews occur, arguing that the ongoing project is illegal and unconstitutional.

    The lawsuit from the nonprofit National Trust for Historic Preservation, which was filed Friday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, represents the first major legal challenge to Trump’s planned 90,000-square-foot addition and is poised to test the limits of his power. The organization argues that the administration failed to undergo legally required reviews or receive congressional authorization for the project, which Trump has rushed to launch in hopes of completing it before his term ends in 2029.

    “No president is legally allowed to tear down portions of the White House without any review whatsoever — not President Trump, not President Joe Biden, and not anyone else,” the complaint says.

    The administration in October rapidly demolished the East Wing to make way for the ballroom over the objections of the National Trust and other historic preservationists who urged the White House to pause its demolition, submit its plans to the National Capital Planning Commission, and seek public comment.

    Officials responded by saying they would work with the commission, a board that oversees federal building projects and is now led by Trump allies, “at the appropriate time.” It has yet to do so, even as regular work continues on the former East Wing site.

    The White House did not immediately respond Friday morning to questions about the lawsuit. The administration has maintained that Trump has authority over White House grounds and is working to improve them at no cost to taxpayers, dismissing critics as “unhinged leftists” who seized on the imagery of bulldozers tearing down what has been called “the People’s House” as a metaphor for the opening year of his term.

    “The lawsuit is our last resort,” Carol Quillen, National Trust’s CEO, said in an interview. “We serve the people, and the people are not being served in this process.”

    The National Trust is seeking a temporary restraining order on construction as the court reviews its claims, its lawyers said. One of those lawyers is Greg Craig, a Foley Hoag lawyer who previously served as White House counsel to President Barack Obama, and who is working pro bono on the case. Craig also served as President Bill Clinton’s lawyer during Republicans’ efforts to impeach Clinton in the late 1990s.

    Trump has made the ballroom a focus and frequent talking point in the opening year of his second term, and administration officials have acknowledged that he is involved to the point of micromanagement.

    “In a very short period of time — like about a year and a half — you’re going to have the best ballroom anywhere in the country,” Trump told lawmakers at the White House on Thursday night.

    The president has also maintained that he is not bound by typical building restrictions or the need to seek construction approvals, citing conversations with advisers and experts.

    “They said, ‘Sir, this is the White House. You’re the president of the United States, you can do anything you want,’” Trump said at an October dinner to celebrate the ballroom’s donors.

    Several polls have shown that the ballroom project is broadly unpopular, and Democrats have consistently attacked it, eager to contrast the president’s focus on a luxurious ballroom against many Americans’ concerns about affordability. Some conservatives have also questioned Trump’s plans and pace, asking why the administration did not undergo a formal review process before tearing down part of the symbolic seat of government. The president and his original handpicked architect battled over Trump’s desire to expand the ballroom’s size before Trump replaced him, the Washington Post previously reported.

    The $300 million project is being funded by wealthy individuals and large companies that have contracts with the federal government, including Amazon, Lockheed Martin, and Palantir Technologies. (Amazon founder Jeff Bezos owns the Post.) The administration has released a partial list of contributors but granted some anonymity — eliciting concerns from Democratic lawmakers and others, some of which are reflected in the complaint.

    The National Trust, for example, alleges that the Trump administration violated the Constitution’s property clause, which authorizes Congress to oversee property on federal land.

    The National Trust’s lawsuit names Trump and other administration officials, including at the National Park Service and the General Services Administration, as defendants. The National Trust argues that the ballroom plans are legally required to be reviewed by the NCPC and the Commission on Fine Arts, another federal panel, which is without members after Trump fired them in October. The organization also contends that the White House has failed to fulfill its obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act to conduct and publish an assessment of the environmental impact of tearing down the East Wing and disposing of the debris, particularly given concerns about environmental contamination.

    White House officials have previously dismissed criticism from the National Trust, arguing that its leaders are “loser Democrats and liberal donors” who oppose Trump on political grounds. The National Trust has a decades-long association with Trump: In 1995, he donated easements to the organization that made his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida a historic property in exchange for tax breaks. National Trust officials have said they subsequently worked with the Trump organization on “collaborative” construction projects at the resort, including its ballroom.

    The White House also has defended the project by drawing a distinction between construction on the White House grounds, which administration officials say is covered by federal review panels, and demolition and site prep, which they maintain is not.

    However, the National Trust says that this is a distinction without a difference. Recent photos have shown that heavy construction machinery and teams of people are working regularly on the site, and Trump has said that pile drivers are operating “all day, all night.”

    The group’s lawsuit also cites the White House’s own public timeline for the project, which includes a section that says “construction commences” and that it “kicked off in September 2025.”

    Quillen said she did not have a “hard objection” to a White House ballroom — so long as its size, materials and design were consistent with the White House and did not overshadow the main building. It is the National Trust’s job, she said, to preserve American history, particularly at the White House, given the building’s iconic status and central role. She noted that the organization has also brought legal challenges to past administrations’ construction projects.

    “Following the process and enabling public input often results in a better project outcome,” Quillen said.